The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 December 2007, 12:27 AM   #31
kingblackbolt
"TRF" Member
 
kingblackbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Ren
Location: Toronto On Canada
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by stewie View Post
the patek's dont looks as "attractive" as rolex's.....
Stewie I suggest you try asking some bona fide "Patek-aholics" on Timezones Patek forum I would be very interested in their replies...



http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...eadt&frm_id=26
__________________

“Hail to the king, baby" Ash (Army of Darkness 1992)
kingblackbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2007, 04:08 AM   #32
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by stewie View Post
the patek's dont looks as "attractive" as rolex's.....
I think it's safe to say that, much like with automobiles, the looks of a watch are purely subjective to the individual. For some, the PP's are spectacular, for others, not so much so. I happen to think many Patek's are amazing looking and beautiful examples of watchmaking, but do not begrudge those who think otherwise. It's good to have so many choices.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2007, 04:10 AM   #33
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by TARDIS View Post
I like this one:

Case in point! That is amazing!
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2007, 04:17 AM   #34
Rackness
"TRF" Member
 
Rackness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harford County MD
Posts: 393
different strokes for different folks they say. Patek may not be your cup of tea but you cannot discount their technical prowess, or exceptional quality. My SD is my favorite watch but I can appreciate a Patek or AP or L.U.C. It does not mean i like my SD any less they are different animals entirely.
Rackness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2007, 04:30 AM   #35
digdug
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fargo
Watch: 16610
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spark View Post
Your a lucky man I am saving for a Nautilus myself
I stumbled on the stupid thing... I stopped at the local jewelry store that happens to sell Patek and mentioned to my normal salesperson that I would buy a Nautilus in aheart beat if they ever got one in. She went and pulled the 5711 out of the vault, as they had gotten it in THAT morning (Saturday). Since I had purchased my Sub Date from her, she said I could have first shot at it. Otherwise on monday morning they were going to start calling the 9 people they had on their list for the 5711. It would have been gone in minutes. I had a hell of a decision to make in an hour. That's a LOT of dough.

In the end, I HAD to buy it. It's too rare and the stars aligned for me to not get it. The cool thing is, they are going for $3,000 more now than I paid for it, so if I ever want to get rid of it, it should not be a problem. But I will never give it up. I love it.

Now I want an LV Sub. And a stainless DateJust. And a Panerai. And another Patek. (this one is platinum and happens to only cost $45,000 )

I could spend ALL my money on watches...
digdug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2007, 10:40 AM   #36
Spencer
"TRF" Member
 
Spencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHat View Post
We all come to this hobby from different directions.

Some start out loving Rolex and evolve to appreciate the offerings of other makers. Some start out with other watches and grow to appreciate Rolex.

In any event, it's silly to say Rolex is better, more attractive etc. OR VICE VERSA. As you grow in experience, you'll learn to appreciate the merits (and maybe downside) of all the top watch makers. As a avid collector or watch lover, one should also diversify at least a bit.
110% agree
__________________
I'm a perpetual kind of guy


Resident Audemars Piguet Fanatic
Spencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2007, 10:52 AM   #37
stewie
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingblackbolt View Post
Stewie I suggest you try asking some bona fide "Patek-aholics" on Timezones Patek forum I would be very interested in their replies...



http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...eadt&frm_id=26
didnt mean any disrespect at all.... really i didnt
stewie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2007, 11:15 AM   #38
watchlady
"TRF" Member
 
watchlady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: the other Lisa
Location: Metro New York
Watch: SS/RG Datejust
Posts: 1,014
What's would be considered an entry level Patek?
watchlady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2007, 11:22 AM   #39
Launch Mini
"TRF" Member
 
Launch Mini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Canada, eh
Watch: can I?
Posts: 6,240
IMO Patek & Vacheron C are probably the top two watch makers in the world.
Some of their complication watches are simply amazing.
Rolex does make fine watches, but as far as complications go, no comparison.
If you ever get a chance, take a look at some of the Pateks out there. The movements are pure works of art.
I fell in love with one, had day, date, year AND it tracked all the month's dates properly, including leap years. The 60k price tag kept it out of my line up.
Too cool, considering I have to adjust my date watches when there are NOT 31 days in a month.
__________________
Something witty to go here.

Member # 293
Launch Mini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2007, 06:13 PM   #40
boa2
2024 Pledge Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchlady View Post
What's would be considered an entry level Patek?
Either an Aquanaut (sport) or Calatrava (dress), though to enter Patek at even this level is a step up from most.
boa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2007, 10:33 AM   #41
kingblackbolt
"TRF" Member
 
kingblackbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Ren
Location: Toronto On Canada
Posts: 1,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by stewie View Post
didnt mean any disrespect at all.... really i didnt
No problem my friend you are just as entitled to your opinion as anyone else... i can think of a few people on here who would agree nothing compares to the Rolex... the people on the Patek forum are just very knowledgeable on the brand and could give you tons of info!

__________________

“Hail to the king, baby" Ash (Army of Darkness 1992)
kingblackbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.