The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 April 2013, 12:37 PM   #31
jot_
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: Explorer I 214270
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Ah, greatest ad copy ever. This was something that DeBeers Diamond came up with and pushed all over the world. For some reason, it stuck in the US and have been used as a rule of thumb by American men for some decades.
Having been recently in the market for an engagement ring - that two month figure has turned into three months salary. Wonder how that happened...
jot_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 12:37 PM   #32
versatile1
"TRF" Member
 
versatile1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
When my savings account first hit 1 million I bought my first datejust.
At 10 million in the account I sprung for a new Sub.
Now that I'm about to reach the 50 million mark I'm thinking a platinum Day Date is deserved.

Is this the kind of answer you're looking for?

I started flipping omega seamasters with a 500 investment until my profits got me my first rolex and so on.

I've never used my income to support my watch habit since the initial 500.
It's purely hobby money.


BTW,
I was kidding about anything that ends in Million
versatile1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 12:42 PM   #33
Brenngun
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Brenngun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,866
Need has nothing to do with it. You're asking the wrong group. You should be asking your "better half".
Brenngun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 01:22 PM   #34
jolimont
"TRF" Member
 
jolimont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
buy now worry later
jolimont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 01:45 PM   #35
tedscott3
"TRF" Member
 
tedscott3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
If you have to ask, you cannot afford it...
I agree with this.
tedscott3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 02:27 PM   #36
Duc5150
2024 Pledge Member
 
Duc5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: TB
Location: West Coast
Posts: 339
I'm one of the....

....sicko's you referenced so I won't even comment


Todd B. in the OC
Duc5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 02:33 PM   #37
DC Engineer
"TRF" Member
 
DC Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NoVA
Watch: 116710
Posts: 218
you can't take any of this stuff with you... so buy what you're comfortable with. Suze Orman would probably be against me buying a Porsche Carrera 4S, but @%#$ her.
DC Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 02:39 PM   #38
Alex Ks
"TRF" Member
 
Alex Ks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 289
I'd say you should spend 10% of your after-tax annual income on watches.. If anything you can always sell your Rolex.
Alex Ks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 02:43 PM   #39
DC Engineer
"TRF" Member
 
DC Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NoVA
Watch: 116710
Posts: 218
on a side note ... i blew a bonus check on my Rolex. not sure what advice, if any, you could gather from that.
DC Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 02:45 PM   #40
Apdl
"TRF" Member
 
Apdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lakeville, MN
Watch: 126610LN Finally!
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by WML View Post
You don't need a 25k watch..you want a 25k. However, if you need to justify it to your spouse..you may be explaining for a long time ;>)
Agreed
here is my logic..
When I finally get my grail it will mark a life milstone
Also, how many of your buddies bought a Boat, Snowmobile,Jet Ski, ATV, Hobby car etc and rarely use it? The watch is probally cheaper and you get to wear it every day of you like!
Way better than those other toys
Apdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 04:19 PM   #41
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
If your wife is concerned with how much you are going to spend on a watch, will she have the same concern if you were buying her a diamond tennis bracelet..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 08:02 PM   #42
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
For me, as long as my wife, kids, living expenses, vacation money and family savings are already taken care of, then all systems are a go.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 08:33 PM   #43
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
If you have to justify ANY purchase then the bus has already left.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 08:44 PM   #44
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Nobody needs a $25,000 watch and the purchase of one cannot by any means be justified, so in that regard you've already lost the battle.

The better argument in my judgement would be that you deserve to spend your discretionary income or your savings in whatever manner you so desire.

Good luck.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 08:50 PM   #45
SUBversive
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
Good question but no right answer. Income is just one part of it. Are you married? Kids? Expenses drive the answer. Mortgage? Private school tuition? But I think you know all this op. you are trying to justify the purchase to your better half. Good luck!
SUBversive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2013, 08:54 PM   #46
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by skypilot View Post
The problem is not the amount of your income, the problem is your wife. If I had asked my wife about buying my toys, I wouldn't have gotten any of them. It is an axiom of married life that one seeks forgiveness, not permission.
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
If you have to ask, you cannot afford it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by aeon888 View Post
That's okay. Most people buy cars or trucks at $25k to $60k price even though the value of the vehicle would depreciate so much in 5 or 10 yrs or 15 yrs.

But your 25k watch may have little depreciation or none at all, depends.
And dont forget the thousands of dollars you have to spend on gas, maintenance, repairs, insurance, and accessories or mods to your vehicle. That adds up.

So, go ahead buy that collectible 25k watch.
+1 on all of the above. You are the only one who knows the answer to this question. The fact that you have to ask might be part of your answer, or do you just want the go ahead from the WIS Gods to smooth things over with the wifey? In that case it's very logical, you need to have an income of at least 25K to buy a 25K watch!
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 10:28 AM   #47
ROGERWILCO357
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Watch: Submariner LV
Posts: 580
wants and needs as I tell my children you want that toy you don’t need that toy.
ROGERWILCO357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 10:47 AM   #48
Gagebuilder
"TRF" Member
 
Gagebuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Doug
Location: Detroit Area
Watch: out for yelow snow
Posts: 1,067
Yoo need to hurry up and get a nickel allergy!

Maybe help it out, scratch your wrist raw!

Then, this would justify a "need" for gold!

__________________
So it's not the steam that causes the failure, but it's water that you notice in the watch after a shower that could lead you to believe the steam damaged the seal, but it's just the unfortunate result of an unserviced mechanical beast.
Gagebuilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 10:52 AM   #49
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
explaining to the wife......lol
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 10:57 AM   #50
mvmbles
"TRF" Member
 
mvmbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Nick
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 759
Net worth and family money/means are more important in determining the value or how much one "should" spend per year on their watch collection. I'm sure I'm not the only one here who spends more per annum on horology than I pull in from my 9-5.
mvmbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 11:01 AM   #51
BarkMaster
"TRF" Member
 
BarkMaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
Agree on a monthly amount you can save towards the watch. When you have saved enough, there is no justification needed.
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK
BarkMaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 11:03 AM   #52
Boothroyd
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angrypuppy View Post
I don't think it has anything at all to do with salary.

I think it's more of a net worth issue.
I was going to type this in response, so x2. Income has nothing to with it in my view, and in my experience.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N
Boothroyd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 11:07 AM   #53
Rockrolex
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Rockrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,969
Larry has a good point. Will your wife have trouble with your spending money on diamonds for her?

But seriously, as almost everyone here has said, only you can determine whether to get a $25K watch. And if you are asking us whether you should get it, you probably don't really want it.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular.

Tosser Cabinet Member

Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
Rockrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 11:50 AM   #54
descartes
"TRF" Member
 
descartes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,116
The true cost of the watch is its depreciation. So, in a sense, a very high end watch bought "right" (e.g. pre-owned with box, papers/extract) is more affordable than the general (uninformed) public might think.
descartes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 01:42 PM   #55
paverman
"TRF" Member
 
paverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Ken
Location: Illinois
Watch: Too many
Posts: 2,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by descartes View Post
The true cost of the watch is its depreciation. So, in a sense, a very high end watch bought "right" (e.g. pre-owned with box, papers/extract) is more affordable than the general (uninformed) public might think.
And a better "investment" than a lot of the other toys we indulge ourselves in, especially cars, IMO.
paverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 04:15 PM   #56
HRV
"TRF" Member
 
HRV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: johannesburg
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 4,407
I think all the sound guidance has been given already ......I just want to see the pics
HRV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 04:34 PM   #57
Grissom
"TRF" Member
 
Grissom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: US, Latin America
Watch: GMT IIc 18K/SS
Posts: 3,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by versatile1 View Post
I started flipping omega seamasters with a 500 investment until my profits got me my first rolex and so on.

I've never used my income to support my watch habit since the initial 500.
It's purely hobby money.
Exactly the same concept here, Jeff....I bought and sold watches and used some of that profit to acquire my own personal watches, as well as other stuff. I started out spending $1,000.00 and have never used any "income" funds from that moment on, and in fact, deal with all my "collectibles" and toys the same way. Nice to see that someone else has gone down the same road. I started buying and selling when still in high school......was, and still is, fun, this way!
__________________
(Member NAWCC since 1976)
116713LN GMT-IIc 18k/SS (Z) + 116520 SS Daytona (M) + 16700 GMT Master (A) + 16610LV Submariner (V) + 16600 Sea Dweller (Z) +
116400 Milgauss White Dial (V) + 70330N Tudor Heritage Chronograph Grey w/Black Sub Dials (J) + 5513 Submariner Serif Dial (5.2 Mil)

Who else needs an Intervention?
(109 297) (137 237) (73 115) (221) (23) (56) (229) P-Club Member #5

RIP JJ Irani - TRF Legend
Grissom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 09:05 PM   #58
DiamondJack
"TRF" Member
 
DiamondJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Watch: Quite a few
Posts: 4,315
Financial advisers will recommend you should have at least 3-6 months net income requirements (as a minimum) retained in a liquid form to cover unexpected eventualities such as losing your job etc.

I personally would keep at least a year's worth to be safe ......

After that, it's your choice what you spend your savings on and some would argue a watch (particularly if you can source a good pre-owned with the initial depreciation taken out of the equation) is more justifiable than many other things you could spend your money on........

Therefore, irrespective of your income, if you don't have sufficient savings in place to meet that emergency fund, you probably shouldn't be thinking about a watch (or anything else) until you have.

But my advice would most definitely be to keep the Mrs on board if you want to enjoy it later.....
DiamondJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 09:16 PM   #59
caryyee
"TRF" Member
 
caryyee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarkMaster View Post
Agree on a monthly amount you can save towards the watch. When you have saved enough, there is no justification needed.
This.

Anyone can afford a $25k watch on any amount of income, you just need a savings plan. Whether it be $50 a week, or $500 a week you are able to save into you 'watch' fund, eventually you will get there. It might be 10 years on $50 a week savings, or 1 year if you're able to save $500 a week into the fund.
Just make sure it's you discretionary funds you are spending from. Some save for a fancy car, or an overseas trip. If your goal is for a gold Rolex, then go for it, it can be done on any budget, eventually you will get there.
caryyee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 09:22 PM   #60
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
most of us 'sickos' usually buy what we can afford - maybe you can figure it out with your wife...
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.