ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 April 2013, 12:37 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: Explorer I 214270
Posts: 310
|
Having been recently in the market for an engagement ring - that two month figure has turned into three months salary. Wonder how that happened...
|
17 April 2013, 12:37 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
|
When my savings account first hit 1 million I bought my first datejust.
At 10 million in the account I sprung for a new Sub. Now that I'm about to reach the 50 million mark I'm thinking a platinum Day Date is deserved. Is this the kind of answer you're looking for? I started flipping omega seamasters with a 500 investment until my profits got me my first rolex and so on. I've never used my income to support my watch habit since the initial 500. It's purely hobby money. BTW, I was kidding about anything that ends in Million |
17 April 2013, 12:42 PM | #33 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,866
|
Need has nothing to do with it. You're asking the wrong group. You should be asking your "better half".
|
17 April 2013, 01:22 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
|
buy now worry later
|
17 April 2013, 01:45 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 572
|
|
17 April 2013, 02:27 PM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: TB
Location: West Coast
Posts: 339
|
I'm one of the....
....sicko's you referenced so I won't even comment
Todd B. in the OC |
17 April 2013, 02:33 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NoVA
Watch: 116710
Posts: 218
|
you can't take any of this stuff with you... so buy what you're comfortable with. Suze Orman would probably be against me buying a Porsche Carrera 4S, but @%#$ her.
|
17 April 2013, 02:39 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 289
|
I'd say you should spend 10% of your after-tax annual income on watches.. If anything you can always sell your Rolex.
|
17 April 2013, 02:43 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NoVA
Watch: 116710
Posts: 218
|
on a side note ... i blew a bonus check on my Rolex. not sure what advice, if any, you could gather from that.
|
17 April 2013, 02:45 PM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lakeville, MN
Watch: 126610LN Finally!
Posts: 415
|
Quote:
here is my logic.. When I finally get my grail it will mark a life milstone Also, how many of your buddies bought a Boat, Snowmobile,Jet Ski, ATV, Hobby car etc and rarely use it? The watch is probally cheaper and you get to wear it every day of you like! Way better than those other toys |
|
17 April 2013, 04:19 PM | #41 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
If your wife is concerned with how much you are going to spend on a watch, will she have the same concern if you were buying her a diamond tennis bracelet..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
17 April 2013, 08:02 PM | #42 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
For me, as long as my wife, kids, living expenses, vacation money and family savings are already taken care of, then all systems are a go.
|
17 April 2013, 08:33 PM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
If you have to justify ANY purchase then the bus has already left.
__________________
E |
17 April 2013, 08:44 PM | #44 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
Nobody needs a $25,000 watch and the purchase of one cannot by any means be justified, so in that regard you've already lost the battle.
The better argument in my judgement would be that you deserve to spend your discretionary income or your savings in whatever manner you so desire. Good luck.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
17 April 2013, 08:50 PM | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
Good question but no right answer. Income is just one part of it. Are you married? Kids? Expenses drive the answer. Mortgage? Private school tuition? But I think you know all this op. you are trying to justify the purchase to your better half. Good luck!
|
17 April 2013, 08:54 PM | #46 | ||
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,249
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
||
18 April 2013, 10:28 AM | #47 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Watch: Submariner LV
Posts: 580
|
wants and needs as I tell my children you want that toy you don’t need that toy.
|
18 April 2013, 10:47 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Doug
Location: Detroit Area
Watch: out for yelow snow
Posts: 1,067
|
Yoo need to hurry up and get a nickel allergy!
Maybe help it out, scratch your wrist raw! Then, this would justify a "need" for gold!
__________________
So it's not the steam that causes the failure, but it's water that you notice in the watch after a shower that could lead you to believe the steam damaged the seal, but it's just the unfortunate result of an unserviced mechanical beast. |
18 April 2013, 10:52 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
explaining to the wife......lol
|
18 April 2013, 10:57 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Nick
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 759
|
Net worth and family money/means are more important in determining the value or how much one "should" spend per year on their watch collection. I'm sure I'm not the only one here who spends more per annum on horology than I pull in from my 9-5.
|
18 April 2013, 11:01 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
Agree on a monthly amount you can save towards the watch. When you have saved enough, there is no justification needed.
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
18 April 2013, 11:03 AM | #52 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,259
|
I was going to type this in response, so x2. Income has nothing to with it in my view, and in my experience.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N |
18 April 2013, 11:07 AM | #53 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,969
|
Larry has a good point. Will your wife have trouble with your spending money on diamonds for her?
But seriously, as almost everyone here has said, only you can determine whether to get a $25K watch. And if you are asking us whether you should get it, you probably don't really want it.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
18 April 2013, 11:50 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,116
|
The true cost of the watch is its depreciation. So, in a sense, a very high end watch bought "right" (e.g. pre-owned with box, papers/extract) is more affordable than the general (uninformed) public might think.
|
18 April 2013, 01:42 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Ken
Location: Illinois
Watch: Too many
Posts: 2,870
|
And a better "investment" than a lot of the other toys we indulge ourselves in, especially cars, IMO.
|
18 April 2013, 04:15 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: johannesburg
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 4,407
|
I think all the sound guidance has been given already ......I just want to see the pics
|
18 April 2013, 04:34 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: US, Latin America
Watch: GMT IIc 18K/SS
Posts: 3,349
|
Exactly the same concept here, Jeff....I bought and sold watches and used some of that profit to acquire my own personal watches, as well as other stuff. I started out spending $1,000.00 and have never used any "income" funds from that moment on, and in fact, deal with all my "collectibles" and toys the same way. Nice to see that someone else has gone down the same road. I started buying and selling when still in high school......was, and still is, fun, this way!
__________________
(Member NAWCC since 1976) 116713LN GMT-IIc 18k/SS (Z) + 116520 SS Daytona (M) + 16700 GMT Master (A) + 16610LV Submariner (V) + 16600 Sea Dweller (Z) + 116400 Milgauss White Dial (V) + 70330N Tudor Heritage Chronograph Grey w/Black Sub Dials (J) + 5513 Submariner Serif Dial (5.2 Mil) Who else needs an Intervention? (109 297) (137 237) (73 115) (221) (23) (56) (229) P-Club Member #5 RIP JJ Irani - TRF Legend |
18 April 2013, 09:05 PM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Watch: Quite a few
Posts: 4,315
|
Financial advisers will recommend you should have at least 3-6 months net income requirements (as a minimum) retained in a liquid form to cover unexpected eventualities such as losing your job etc.
I personally would keep at least a year's worth to be safe ...... After that, it's your choice what you spend your savings on and some would argue a watch (particularly if you can source a good pre-owned with the initial depreciation taken out of the equation) is more justifiable than many other things you could spend your money on........ Therefore, irrespective of your income, if you don't have sufficient savings in place to meet that emergency fund, you probably shouldn't be thinking about a watch (or anything else) until you have. But my advice would most definitely be to keep the Mrs on board if you want to enjoy it later..... |
18 April 2013, 09:16 PM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
Quote:
Anyone can afford a $25k watch on any amount of income, you just need a savings plan. Whether it be $50 a week, or $500 a week you are able to save into you 'watch' fund, eventually you will get there. It might be 10 years on $50 a week savings, or 1 year if you're able to save $500 a week into the fund. Just make sure it's you discretionary funds you are spending from. Some save for a fancy car, or an overseas trip. If your goal is for a gold Rolex, then go for it, it can be done on any budget, eventually you will get there. |
|
18 April 2013, 09:22 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
most of us 'sickos' usually buy what we can afford - maybe you can figure it out with your wife...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.