ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Piloto · 13 May 2013, 05:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaching

Explorer II 42mm Black Dial....any questions?

Attachment 386988

My Answer.

For comparison. Once I nix the PCLs, this is a no brainer for me now.

Image courtesy of keepthetime.com

AF_Rob · 12 May 2013, 02:32 PM

out of the current models I would go GMT. If it was classic models, I would go polar explorer II...unless it was a Pepsi..but now, I'm just getting off point ;)

cop414 · 13 May 2013, 10:41 AM

If new I'd go with the Explorer II, if going old model I'd go with the GMT. Just my .02

nick c · 13 May 2013, 11:33 AM

Gmt ii

Moraguy · 13 May 2013, 12:13 PM

Decisions decisions.

Moraguy · 13 May 2013, 12:19 PM

Decisions Decisions

petenyc · 14 May 2013, 12:05 AM

explorer II

gmtm2 · 14 May 2013, 01:49 AM

no doubt....

Ravager135 · 12 May 2013, 04:08 PM

The GMTIIC is more of a classic per se. The rotating bezel really is unnecessary (are you really tracking 3 time zones), both give relatively the same functionality. The GMTIIC is a little dressier, a little more white collar. PCLs are a minus for some. More subtle. Easier to dress up or down.

The Explorer II is more rugged, designed for easy legibility, has both a white and black dial option. More of an outdoorsy, blue collar feel. More casual. More unusual. Some people rave about the larger size, I don't think it should really play a factor. 39-42mm is the sweet spot for me. Slightly louder.

If none of those points regarding heritage really speak to you, just pick the one you like better.

ctomsee · 12 May 2013, 11:54 PM

There are some very nice older series pre-loved GMT Masters to be had on the forums. That would be my first target. If none sing to you, then the current ceramic-dial GMT. Sorry, just not a fan of the Explorer IIs.

submariner123 · 13 May 2013, 12:03 AM

I would love the new Explorer II if it wasn't for the orange on it. I like the 16570.

slim4511 · 13 May 2013, 01:54 AM

I say both. My solution to the same question was the older style Exp II Polar (16570) paired with the new GMT IIc. Absolutely love both. My polar Exp II gets more wrist time though.

superbry · 13 May 2013, 04:56 AM

gmt2c. Just saw the exp2 polar white, IMO case is too big, there seems to be too much space available inside

GsurgBM · 13 May 2013, 05:09 AM

this

capote · 13 May 2013, 05:07 AM

I don't care for any of the new models. Between a 16710 and a 16570 it is a tie IMO. GMT for its iconic look, Exp2 for it being more unusual and lowkey (just today I saw a pepsi and a YG GMT in the street). When I was choosing I went with an Exp2.

AALANMan · 13 May 2013, 06:14 AM

Love the GMTII rotating bezel. I don't track 3 time zones, but I do use it to time steaks on the grill! :D

theken · 13 May 2013, 10:51 AM

I think it depends upon the other Rolexes you own.
If you have a Sub/Seadweller, I would go for the EXP II.
The 42mm EXPII is one of my favorites of the current Rolex models.

cedargrove · 13 May 2013, 01:24 PM

I have the GMTc, but if the Exp42 existed at the time it would have been a tough choice. Two of my favourite watches.

How do you intend to use it? I think the GMT can be dressed up a little more, and the Exp42 can take a little more abuse.

Z-Sub · 13 May 2013, 01:56 PM

GMT

hknslmz · 13 May 2013, 11:58 PM

Exp II pre-owned for its better size and super comfort..Black and white are both great choices.

sea-dweller · 14 May 2013, 01:42 AM

They are both awesome!

SRQ · 14 May 2013, 02:17 AM

Wait 6 months, save up some more money, and get the new black and blue GMT.

13 May 2013, 10:41 AM	#3
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 72,234	If new I'd go with the Explorer II, if going old model I'd go with the GMT. Just my .02 __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

13 May 2013, 12:13 PM	#5
Moraguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Willis, TX Posts: 48	Decisions decisions. Attached Images

13 May 2013, 12:19 PM	#6
Moraguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Willis, TX Posts: 48	Explorer vs GMT Decisions Decisions Attached Images

14 May 2013, 01:49 AM	#8
gmtm2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Italy Posts: 1,419	no doubt.... Attached Images __________________ forever rolex

13 May 2013, 01:54 AM	#12
slim4511 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Detroit Posts: 484	I say both. My solution to the same question was the older style Exp II Polar (16570) paired with the new GMT IIc. Absolutely love both. My polar Exp II gets more wrist time though. __________________ GMT IIc, Exp II, Speedy Pro If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.

12 May 2013, 02:32 PM	#2
AF_Rob "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Rob Location: Virginia Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB Posts: 4,671	out of the current models I would go GMT. If it was classic models, I would go polar explorer II...unless it was a Pepsi..but now, I'm just getting off point ;)

13 May 2013, 11:33 AM	#4
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	Gmt ii

14 May 2013, 12:05 AM	#7
petenyc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: pete Location: NYC Watch: 116610LN Posts: 1,011	explorer II

12 May 2013, 04:08 PM	#9
Ravager135 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: New Jersey Posts: 4,224	The GMTIIC is more of a classic per se. The rotating bezel really is unnecessary (are you really tracking 3 time zones), both give relatively the same functionality. The GMTIIC is a little dressier, a little more white collar. PCLs are a minus for some. More subtle. Easier to dress up or down. The Explorer II is more rugged, designed for easy legibility, has both a white and black dial option. More of an outdoorsy, blue collar feel. More casual. More unusual. Some people rave about the larger size, I don't think it should really play a factor. 39-42mm is the sweet spot for me. Slightly louder. If none of those points regarding heritage really speak to you, just pick the one you like better.

12 May 2013, 11:54 PM	#10
ctomsee 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Tom Location: Chicago Watch: '71 Explorer 1016 Posts: 350	There are some very nice older series pre-loved GMT Masters to be had on the forums. That would be my first target. If none sing to you, then the current ceramic-dial GMT. Sorry, just not a fan of the Explorer IIs.

13 May 2013, 12:03 AM	#11
submariner123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Real Name: Thomas Location: England Watch: 116610LN Posts: 643	I would love the new Explorer II if it wasn't for the orange on it. I like the 16570.

13 May 2013, 04:56 AM	#13
superbry Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: HKG Watch: Rolex, Panerai Posts: 223	gmt2c. Just saw the exp2 polar white, IMO case is too big, there seems to be too much space available inside

13 May 2013, 05:09 AM	#14
GsurgBM "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: USA Watch: Not enough Posts: 3,759	this Attached Images

13 May 2013, 05:07 AM	#15
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	I don't care for any of the new models. Between a 16710 and a 16570 it is a tie IMO. GMT for its iconic look, Exp2 for it being more unusual and lowkey (just today I saw a pepsi and a YG GMT in the street). When I was choosing I went with an Exp2.

13 May 2013, 06:14 AM	#16
AALANMan "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Real Name: Carl Location: Texas Watch: 16710 "Coke" Posts: 47	Love the GMTII rotating bezel. I don't track 3 time zones, but I do use it to time steaks on the grill! :D

13 May 2013, 10:51 AM	#17
theken "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Watch: GMT-Master II Posts: 3,417	I think it depends upon the other Rolexes you own. If you have a Sub/Seadweller, I would go for the EXP II. The 42mm EXPII is one of my favorites of the current Rolex models.

13 May 2013, 01:24 PM	#18
cedargrove "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Rich Location: Canada Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc Posts: 3,013	I have the GMTc, but if the Exp42 existed at the time it would have been a tough choice. Two of my favourite watches. How do you intend to use it? I think the GMT can be dressed up a little more, and the Exp42 can take a little more abuse.

13 May 2013, 01:56 PM	#19
Z-Sub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: So Cal, USA Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man Posts: 7,383	GMT __________________ SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297

13 May 2013, 11:58 PM	#20
hknslmz "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Turkey Watch: Explorer II 16570 Posts: 209	Exp II pre-owned for its better size and super comfort..Black and white are both great choices.

14 May 2013, 01:42 AM	#21
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	They are both awesome!

14 May 2013, 02:17 AM	#22
SRQ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Robert Location: Florida Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 76	Wait 6 months, save up some more money, and get the new black and blue GMT.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)