ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Baptistman · 16 January 2008, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robb

If you already have the SD then I would stick with it!!

I do own the SD right now, purchased BNIB from my AD, in Nov 2007 Z serial.

kcmo · 16 January 2008, 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baptistman

I do own the SD right now, purchased BNIB from my AD, in Nov 2007 Z serial.

Ahhh, I didn't realize you already HAVE the SD....

daveathall · 16 January 2008, 05:11 AM

No contest! Sea Dweller.

Ricardo · 16 January 2008, 05:42 AM

SEA DWELLER

anything else is less

DC watchman · 16 January 2008, 08:54 AM

SD. I need to look at the date, although the 14060M is a beautiful watch.

Are you sure it is bulk or boredom that is pushing this decision???

Texsubmariner · 16 January 2008, 10:55 AM

Both are fine watches. I vote for the SD. But if you like the slimmer profile, go for the Sub Date. The date function is important to me. But pick what smiles at you. Life is short, so don't feel too bad when you flip.

Tombstone · 16 January 2008, 01:29 PM

SD for my vote.

CPCC · 16 January 2008, 01:33 PM

Can never go wrong with a rolex but SD is more practicle.

joieboie · 16 January 2008, 01:58 PM

I'll go with 14060M, coz' that's what I got last christmas from my wife....LOVE U HONEY..

DSJ · 16 January 2008, 02:51 PM

Also, IMO, it's the nicest looking Rolex sport for putting on a strap!

666 Bandit · 16 January 2008, 03:10 PM

14060m & I like better w/o cosc

Lubrifar · 16 January 2008, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 666 Bandit

14060m & I like better w/o cosc

Same here.

TARDIS · 16 January 2008, 03:29 PM

I have owned the 14060M and I must say it was a beaut watch to look at and kept fantastic time:

My Sea-Dweller is a little more bulkier, but it is not uncomfortable and it too is deadly accurate:

I do not regret getting the SD. The 14060M has now been modified by Rolex with the COSC and CRB, but we are yet to see at Basel 2008 what changes there will be to the 16600.....if any.

Maybe they will discontinue it in which case I will have a collectors model $$$$$$!

Cheers
Steve

joieboie · 16 January 2008, 04:48 PM

Steve, those are nice pics

TARDIS · 16 January 2008, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joieboie

Steve, those are nice pics

View Poll Results: Sd or new 14060M
SD	44	54.32%
14060M COSC	37	45.68%
Voters: 81. You may not vote on this poll

16 January 2008, 01:33 PM	#8
CPCC "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Bill Location: USA Posts: 1,857	Can never go wrong with a rolex but SD is more practicle. __________________

16 January 2008, 02:51 PM	#10
DSJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: David Location: USA Watch: your step! Posts: 7,882	Also, IMO, it's the nicest looking Rolex sport for putting on a strap! __________________ Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP

16 January 2008, 05:11 AM	#3
daveathall "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Dave Location: England. Watch: Various Posts: 7,305	No contest! Sea Dweller.

16 January 2008, 05:42 AM	#4
Ricardo Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Ricky Location: England Posts: 33	SEA DWELLER anything else is less

16 January 2008, 08:54 AM	#5
DC watchman Banned Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: VA Posts: 305	SD. I need to look at the date, although the 14060M is a beautiful watch. Are you sure it is bulk or boredom that is pushing this decision???

16 January 2008, 10:55 AM	#6
Texsubmariner "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Khanh Location: Texas Watch: SSGMTc Posts: 1,227	Both are fine watches. I vote for the SD. But if you like the slimmer profile, go for the Sub Date. The date function is important to me. But pick what smiles at you. Life is short, so don't feel too bad when you flip.

16 January 2008, 01:29 PM	#7
Tombstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Richard Location: LV, NV Watch: LV Sub and others Posts: 2,689	SD for my vote.

16 January 2008, 01:58 PM	#9
joieboie Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Joseph Location: NORCAL Watch: Submariner Posts: 166	I'll go with 14060M, coz' that's what I got last christmas from my wife....LOVE U HONEY..

16 January 2008, 03:10 PM	#11
666 Bandit Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Florida Posts: 49	14060m & I like better w/o cosc

16 January 2008, 03:29 PM	#13
TARDIS "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Queensland, AUST Posts: 2,003	I have owned the 14060M and I must say it was a beaut watch to look at and kept fantastic time: My Sea-Dweller is a little more bulkier, but it is not uncomfortable and it too is deadly accurate: I do not regret getting the SD. The 14060M has now been modified by Rolex with the COSC and CRB, but we are yet to see at Basel 2008 what changes there will be to the 16600.....if any. Maybe they will discontinue it in which case I will have a collectors model $$$$$$! Cheers Steve

16 January 2008, 04:48 PM	#14
joieboie Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Joseph Location: NORCAL Watch: Submariner Posts: 166	Steve, those are nice pics

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)