|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
26 July 2013, 02:16 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
nope
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
 |
|
|
|
26 July 2013, 02:23 AM
|
#2 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,091
|
If it had a matte dial and domed crystal absolutely.
|
|
|
|
|
26 July 2013, 07:10 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: England
Posts: 40
|
My first reaction on seeing the subject was "Sea Dweller with new lume, ceramic bezel and glide lock? Hell yes!" but on reflection I think I feel the same as others - the 16600 is damned near perfect as it is, so no.
__________________
The Swiss: Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600, Breitling Navitimer 01, Tudor Heritage Ranger The Russians: Strela 42mm 3133, Sekonda Strela 3017, Vostok Amphibia 100657 The Others: Nomos Tangente 38 Datum, Bulova Accutron Spaceview, Ancient Pulsar Quartz |
|
|
|
|
26 July 2013, 07:13 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
No way. I like it the way it is/was.
|
|
|
|
|
28 July 2013, 11:15 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: USA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 1,928
|
I would take a good look at it. probably say no way.
You can't beat a classic - LOVE the SD as it is - Perfection!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
28 July 2013, 11:26 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2,008
|
I would not purchase one.
|
|
|
|
|
28 July 2013, 01:22 PM
|
#7 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,785
|
No, I like my original SD.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
