ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Andad · 15 February 2008, 01:28 PM

I vote for owning both.

robbyrolex · 15 February 2008, 01:40 PM

The sub date

mdx77 · 15 February 2008, 01:46 PM

Sub date........

seantk · 16 February 2008, 02:35 AM

I voted for the Dweller however, this is a tough decision for me as I am actually contemplating as Sea Dweller or a Sub Date. I might get the Sea Dweller now and then wait for this

JJ Irani · 16 February 2008, 02:48 AM

The ultimate, quintessential and easily the most recognised sports watch in the world. This one!!

Gurmot · 16 February 2008, 02:51 AM

SD. Simply the best IMHO.

kcmo · 16 February 2008, 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

The ultimate, quintessential and easily the most recognised sports watch in the world. This one!!

What a gorgeous photo JJ!

JJ Irani · 16 February 2008, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcmo

What a gorgeous photo JJ!

Thanks, Karis. I really miss that baby.

Sold it to a nice guy in Australia. It was a D-series and that chap's real happy with it!!

kcmo · 16 February 2008, 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Thanks, Karis. I really miss that baby.

Sold it to a nice guy in Australia. It was a D-series and that chap's real happy with it!!

Looks just like my D-series! Perhaps another will fall into your hands in the future

PhilM · 16 February 2008, 05:15 AM

SD for me

MAC4130 · 16 February 2008, 05:19 AM

Sub Date for me please, to go!... everywhere and anywhere!!!!!.

MAC4130 · 16 February 2008, 05:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seantk

I voted for the Dweller however, this is a tough decision for me as I am actually contemplating as Sea Dweller or a Sub Date. I might get the Sea Dweller now and then wait for this

Sean, I am with you all the way!!!! Did you photoshoped this one?

I would like to see a Ceramic Sub but without the brushed center links!!!!

watchboy · 16 February 2008, 05:33 AM

I always believe the better features is a better watch. So the SD wins my vote, hands down. Not even the DRSD or COMEX wins my vote over the late SD, cos the late SD is simply better than those too. JMO.

Don't be deceived by the SD's look, right under that dial packs with a PUNCH!!!

ROGERB · 16 February 2008, 05:40 AM

TO EACH HIS OWN.....SS Sub date!
R

watchboy · 16 February 2008, 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROGERB

TO EACH HIS OWN.....SS Sub date!
R

Very True! And I agree.

But what if the SD has a cyclop, I wonder those who voted for Sub will go for the SD?

However, for me, if even the Sub has no cyclop, I would not go for it as it still lacks of a helium release and not rated 4000ft.

JMO.

Bobareno · 16 February 2008, 05:49 AM

Sea Dweller all the way.

watchboy · 16 February 2008, 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobareno

Sea Dweller all the way.

Bottoms up!!!

Thomas · 16 February 2008, 05:57 AM

In a 'round about way if you have one you have the other, only a couple of subtle differences between the two, and most people will NEVER take either one to the max limit underwater anyway. The price difference between the two is not that great so if someone wants the SD, go for it. Don't forget you can always remove the cyclops from the Sub if it's something you don't care for.

JBat · 16 February 2008, 06:17 AM

Voted Sub.

mattyo · 16 February 2008, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

Sub, hands down..

There wouldn't even be a Sea Dweller if the Sub hadn't started it all..

And the cyclops...everybody looks at your wrist for that tell-tale bubble...

Oh yeah........that's the one..

x2

stalenhag · 16 February 2008, 08:08 AM

My vote is the SD since I have a all-black GMT already, the Sub and GMT is more alike. The SD is a mean diving machine in my opinion...

DavidHasselhoff · 16 February 2008, 08:15 AM

Sub Date! I wouldn't mind owning a SD as well. But it won't be my next...Fourth maybe...

Baptistman · 16 February 2008, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steel4me

Baptistman,

Are you regretting trading in your SD for the SUB?

steelman

Watch this pace

zeppe19avr · 16 February 2008, 09:19 AM

SD for me ! I prefer the heavyweight versus the lightweight. Also prefer the cleaner looking no cyclops crystal.

LuvMyRolex · 16 February 2008, 09:22 AM

Sea Dweller all the way. I was initially drawn to the Sub but on reflection preferred not to have the cyclops. For me it ruined the lines of the watch. For me, the SD is perfection.

Egelber · 16 February 2008, 12:31 PM

I have a SD. One watch one man. thats all she wrote. I think the SD is more popular here on TRF, but it is said the sub date is more pop. Forget what we think, and get what makes you smile. I am a big guy so the SD makes me smile.

Tombstone · 16 February 2008, 12:33 PM

SD is there any other choice????

If it were not for the model T there would not be a Shelby Cobra. Which would you own??????

frostie · 16 February 2008, 12:33 PM

Sub date still has the lead

fear · 16 February 2008, 12:43 PM

"Don't be deceived by the SD's look, right under that dial packs with a PUNCH!!!"

Nice photo watchboy!

mdtddd2007 · 16 February 2008, 02:49 PM

SD all the the way. Nice and clean. And feel more sportier and heavy. I love the thickness of the crystal. Just got mine just recently. Can't take my eyes of it.

View Poll Results: Submariner Date S/S or Sea-Dweller
Sub Date S/S	83	52.20%
Sea-Dweller	77	48.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll

15 February 2008, 01:28 PM	#31
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,533	I vote for owning both. __________________ E

15 February 2008, 01:40 PM	#32
robbyrolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Phoenix Posts: 203	16610 The sub date

15 February 2008, 01:46 PM	#33
mdx77 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Kurt Location: Philly Burbs!! Posts: 3,296	Sub date........ __________________ “This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the BLUE pill - the story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the RED pill - you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.” Rolex Submariner 116610LV Hulk \| Rolex GMT 16710 Pepsi \| Omega Speedmaster “Speedy Tuesday” \| Tudor Black Bay 79220R “ETA Rose” \| Tudor Pelagos Blue Dial \| Rolex Submariner Yellow Gold 116618LB \| Rolex Milgauss “Z-Blue” 116400GV

16 February 2008, 02:35 AM	#34
seantk "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Sean Location: West Florida Posts: 2,671	I voted for the Dweller however, this is a tough decision for me as I am actually contemplating as Sea Dweller or a Sub Date. I might get the Sea Dweller now and then wait for this Attached Images __________________ "Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau

16 February 2008, 02:48 AM	#35
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	The ultimate, quintessential and easily the most recognised sports watch in the world. This one!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

16 February 2008, 02:51 AM	#36
Gurmot Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Simon Location: UK Posts: 568	SD. Simply the best IMHO.

16 February 2008, 05:15 AM	#40
PhilM "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Phil Location: London Watch: Sea-Dweller Posts: 1,765	SD for me

16 February 2008, 05:19 AM	#41
MAC4130 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Miguel Cornejo Location: El Paso Tx Watch: 116500LN Posts: 488	Sub Date for me please, to go!... everywhere and anywhere!!!!!.

16 February 2008, 05:33 AM	#43
watchboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Jacky Location: Watch World Posts: 244	I always believe the better features is a better watch. So the SD wins my vote, hands down. Not even the DRSD or COMEX wins my vote over the late SD, cos the late SD is simply better than those too. JMO. Don't be deceived by the SD's look, right under that dial packs with a PUNCH!!!

16 February 2008, 05:40 AM	#44
ROGERB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: WHITE ROCK BC Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914, Posts: 897	TO EACH HIS OWN.....SS Sub date! R

16 February 2008, 05:49 AM	#46
Bobareno Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Phoenix Posts: 739	Sea Dweller all the way.

16 February 2008, 05:57 AM	#48
Thomas Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: USA Posts: 625	In a 'round about way if you have one you have the other, only a couple of subtle differences between the two, and most people will NEVER take either one to the max limit underwater anyway. The price difference between the two is not that great so if someone wants the SD, go for it. Don't forget you can always remove the cyclops from the Sub if it's something you don't care for.

16 February 2008, 06:17 AM	#49
JBat "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: John Location: Washington Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ Posts: 7,329	Voted Sub.

16 February 2008, 08:08 AM	#51
stalenhag "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: planet earth Posts: 243	My vote is the SD since I have a all-black GMT already, the Sub and GMT is more alike. The SD is a mean diving machine in my opinion...

16 February 2008, 08:15 AM	#52
DavidHasselhoff Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Sweden Watch: SS Submariner Posts: 312	Sub Date! I wouldn't mind owning a SD as well. But it won't be my next...Fourth maybe...

16 February 2008, 09:19 AM	#54
zeppe19avr Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Robert Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: Sea-dweller Z ser. Posts: 67	SD for me ! I prefer the heavyweight versus the lightweight. Also prefer the cleaner looking no cyclops crystal.

16 February 2008, 09:22 AM	#55
LuvMyRolex Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Andrew Location: Japan Watch: Sea-Dweller Posts: 93	Sea Dweller all the way. I was initially drawn to the Sub but on reflection preferred not to have the cyclops. For me it ruined the lines of the watch. For me, the SD is perfection.

16 February 2008, 12:31 PM	#56
Egelber "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Elliott Location: Prosper, Texas Watch: Sub 114060 2019 Posts: 410	I have a SD. One watch one man. thats all she wrote. I think the SD is more popular here on TRF, but it is said the sub date is more pop. Forget what we think, and get what makes you smile. I am a big guy so the SD makes me smile.

16 February 2008, 12:33 PM	#57
Tombstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Richard Location: LV, NV Watch: LV Sub and others Posts: 2,689	SD is there any other choice???? If it were not for the model T there would not be a Shelby Cobra. Which would you own?????? __________________ Always working...by choice

16 February 2008, 12:33 PM	#58
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	Sub date still has the lead __________________ GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN

16 February 2008, 12:43 PM	#59
fear "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Mililani, Oahu Posts: 1,307	"Don't be deceived by the SD's look, right under that dial packs with a PUNCH!!!" Nice photo watchboy!

16 February 2008, 02:49 PM	#60
mdtddd2007 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: U.S Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS Posts: 5,785	SD all the the way. Nice and clean. And feel more sportier and heavy. I love the thickness of the crystal. Just got mine just recently. Can't take my eyes of it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)