The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 January 2014, 02:11 AM   #31
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
I think it's probably the same percentage of young folks as it was 30 years ago. The watch industry is doing just fine. Hell, they raise prices all the time and we still buy.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 02:36 AM   #32
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
The proof is in the sales....
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 02:43 AM   #33
KMdad44
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: GMT ll c
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVR View Post
So true, I have been a member here from the beginning. And although a great forum everything just keeps coming back over and over again. The same questions, the same concerns, the same joy. It will never stop.

It's a given that many of you who are active today will have left and will not post any more because you have done and seen it all. Look at at the active posters today. 90% are recent members fresh to debate the model, size, material, etc etc of a Rolex.

Some leave because they get bored, others start to get interested in an other brands, usually the high end watches like Patek, Lange, etc.

So the only difference we will see in 5 years time is that most of you will have been replaced by new members starting all over with the topics you are discussing today.
Then I'll still be here
KMdad44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 02:45 AM   #34
KMdad44
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: GMT ll c
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by jctrolex View Post
In that case I will give you $100 for your entire collection before they become worthless in 5 years time.
Thanks for the generous offer, but I'll take my chances.
KMdad44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 02:51 AM   #35
KMdad44
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: GMT ll c
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBversive View Post
X2

And I wouldn't bet against the op article that few young people know how to read a watch.
agree. A lot don't know how. It is like the manual transmission car. Some driving schools are not even teaching it any more because 5% of the new cars on the road is manual shifters.
KMdad44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 03:10 AM   #36
mr.president1
"TRF" Member
 
mr.president1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio,UnitedStates
Watch: ROLEX OMEGA
Posts: 1,458
I don't think we are coming to the end of watches as we know it. In fact I was on the college campus I graduated from during their HC game, and saw many students wearing a watch. So, I highly doubt we're coming to the end.
__________________

ROLEX & OMEGA
mr.president1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 03:18 AM   #37
East Bay Rider
"TRF" Member
 
East Bay Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,073
Of the young people who wear a watch, many wear fashion brands simply as an accessory. When they get older and mature they may upgrade to more 'serious' brands. Of the few that develop an actual interest in watches they will become the future WIS's.
IMO while the total number of watch wearers may be less, there will be more INTERESTED watch wearers.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man
Floating down canal
It doesn't use numbers or moving hands
It always just says "now"
Now you may be thinking that I was had
But this watch is never wrong
And if I have trouble the warranty said
Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On
J. Buffett
Instagram: eastbayrider46
East Bay Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 05:51 AM   #38
shnxx
"TRF" Member
 
shnxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
We are coming to the end of watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7 View Post
Well, the test would be to ask a 16 year-old boy two questions:

"would you like to own/drive a Ferrari?"

"would you like to own/wear a Rolex?"

and compare the answers.

Not sure what birkins are.

Several things.

1) Ferrari markets to children a lot more than Rolex or Patek. They're an advertising machine. Whether it is children or women, Ferrari has more brand awareness.

2) Ferrari costs a lot more than most Rolexes. Rolex is also not positioned near the top of the price range like Ferrari is.

3) You ask the same kid if he wants to have a Rolex watch 7-8 years later and he will likely change his answer, as he should now realize that Rolex is clearly a conspicuous status symbol.

It's also unclear what is meant by "young people" by the TRF members here.
Many forum members are in their 20s or early 30s.
That's about the lowest age group most people can afford nice watches by their own earnings.
Would it be surprising to learn that 16 year olds cannot use their salary to buy rolexes?
Do 16 year olds buy any nice things using their income?
And most likely, many 16 year olds from wealthy families already own rolexes and similar watches.
__________________
newb watch collector
shnxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 05:59 AM   #39
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
I wore one of these all through college in the mid to late Eighties and a somewhat updated model in grad school in the Nineties.

Cutting edge at the time and perfect for a student living on next to nothing.


.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg casio databank.jpg (63.8 KB, 38 views)
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 08:17 AM   #40
shnxx
"TRF" Member
 
shnxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I wore one of these all through college in the mid to late Eighties and a somewhat updated model in grad school in the Nineties.

Cutting edge at the time and perfect for a student living on next to nothing.


.
wow you would have fit right in at my school.
__________________
newb watch collector
shnxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2014, 04:32 AM   #41
Piloto
"TRF" Member
 
Piloto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: My overnight bag
Watch: 16613 & 116710BLNR
Posts: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7 View Post
For sure, none of my nieces and nephews wear a watch. Young people at the office don't either.
Probably cant read an analog watch or clock anyway.

I don't think there is a threat. The people that wear smart watches, will be the same ones lined up to have the computer/gps-tracker chip installed in their head so they can facebook via brainwaves. IMHO, it might be 10-15% of the potential watch market at the most.
Piloto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2014, 04:43 AM   #42
gulfstream69xr7
"TRF" Member
 
gulfstream69xr7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Medford NJ
Watch: TAG Rolex
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMdad44 View Post
I agree young people do not wear them
My 22 and 24 year old "kids" both wear watches. My son owns several. Both of my best friends boys wear them, and collect them. I have had far more compliments/questions on my watches from twenty somethings than I get from any other age group. It is about half and half in my corporate office, but it is also about half and half with 40-50+ age group here as well. I see girls everywhere wearing the gaudy Michael Kors watches.

Is this a regional thing?
gulfstream69xr7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2014, 05:00 AM   #43
Watchflair
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Watchflair's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Jim
Location: Westchester NY
Watch: Love em all
Posts: 5,920
Hmmm. Thinking on it most people I know wear some sort of watch. I'm 30. I think it's even more prevalent that most working professionals wear one as well.
__________________
Remember what matters. Value everyday
Watchflair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2014, 06:30 AM   #44
00pumpkin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dustin
Location: USA
Posts: 1,980
Like many here, I completely disagree. I think wrist-wear will only continue to expand.
00pumpkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.