ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 February 2014, 04:24 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Quote:
I can admit I purchased my SubC with every intention of wearing it for a little while, then either flipping it or putting it away for my oldest son as a college graduation present someday (said son was born when the SubC was introduced at Basel...so I thought the connection would be cool). But as I said...within short order I absolutely fell in love w/ the SubC and stopped wearing the DSSD. Is yours a Sub or SubC? As a previous owner of 2 Subs, I too can relate that compared to those watches, I would lust for the DSSD. But if you don't have the SubC, you might be surprised at how much you like it if you're such a fan of the DSSD. IMO, the SubC is unique in that it takes all the positive attributes of the previous Sub, yet incorporates many of the improvements found in the DSSD (maxi-dial, Glidelock, fatter hands, amazing spring loaded ball-bearing ratchet system for the bezel, etc)...yet all in a case/size that is more universal for both sport & formal settings. I always felt my DSSD was a little too "in your face" when I wore it with business attire in the workplace...something I don't feel when I wear my SubC in the same setting. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.