ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RussW · 26 March 2014, 07:00 PM

Some more photos on watch insider. The bezel no longer attaches to the ears. Can we still call it a nautilus? I actually like how they've done the left buttons, I just wish they'd got a better arrangement for the sub dials.

Photo credit: watch-insider.com

cozy2009 · 26 March 2014, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by conkers

A windowed date might have cleaned up the dial a little, but then maybe 3 windows is too much. Not sure yet, but I actually think I may like this, and this from someone who is not a Nautilus fan at all!

I agree if they had a windowed date below and the PP name up top this would be very nice. I guess technically it might not have been possible.

AK797 · 26 March 2014, 10:46 PM

Home and Local are too large, too inelegant. And I dislike dials which have the brand logo at the bottom of the dial.

Le Chef · 26 March 2014, 10:50 PM

The 5990 looks like it was designed by someone with serious OCD. You can imagine them obsessively trying to cram more details onto the dial and then spending every waking minute rearranging them so it might look neat and tidy.

I'm sticking with a simpler approach and keeping my Chrono and GMT functions separate in different watches.

Le Chef · 26 March 2014, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Argh! 5164 vs 5990...

Go for the 5164. On the 5990 the event would be over before you'd figured out which thing to press to make it happen. It's a Walter Mitty watch.

Puffy · 26 March 2014, 11:09 PM

100% yum

raclaims · 27 March 2014, 12:55 AM

I love it!! Remember that the GMT had disappears behind the hour hand if you aren't using it. I wish they had this when i bought my 5164

Cru Jones · 27 March 2014, 01:50 AM

i need time, but, my initial feeling is "yes please!!"

FremStar · 27 March 2014, 02:11 AM

Simple response... FUVK YES!!!!

26 March 2014, 10:50 PM	#34
Le Chef "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Chicago Posts: 2,005	Oh dear! The 5990 looks like it was designed by someone with serious OCD. You can imagine them obsessively trying to cram more details onto the dial and then spending every waking minute rearranging them so it might look neat and tidy. I'm sticking with a simpler approach and keeping my Chrono and GMT functions separate in different watches.

26 March 2014, 11:09 PM	#36
Puffy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 12,485	100% yum __________________ Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten

27 March 2014, 02:11 AM	#39
FremStar "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Sam Location: Gotham City Watch: Wall Street Posts: 9,954	Simple response... FUVK YES!!!! __________________ "Wealth is of the heart and mind, not of the pocket!" "A Watch Is An Emotional Object, And So, It Is The Responsibility Of The Brand To Create Emotion Through It's Products" - Georges Kern "In the 1950s and 60s, they made the Ref 8171, which is a cult collectible—now that’s the ultimate Rolex you could own with a calendar and a moon phase.” - John Reardon "Heh, heh, heh..." - Michael Kilyung

26 March 2014, 10:46 PM	#33
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,368	Home and Local are too large, too inelegant. And I dislike dials which have the brand logo at the bottom of the dial.

27 March 2014, 12:55 AM	#37
raclaims "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: NJ Posts: 2,624	I love it!! Remember that the GMT had disappears behind the hour hand if you aren't using it. I wish they had this when i bought my 5164

27 March 2014, 01:50 AM	#38
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,273	i need time, but, my initial feeling is "yes please!!"

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)