ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 April 2014, 08:06 AM | #31 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
No prob! In the end it is just a $300 insert so in the grand scheme of things... And I always have heart palpitations before doing something stupid and sometimes regrets after "Look Ma, No Hands"
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
|
3 April 2014, 08:11 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
|
3 April 2014, 10:30 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Rich
Location: NC
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 2,359
|
Here is mine. Was jet black. Bleach and a few dunks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97 |
3 April 2014, 10:49 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
|
That is one beautiful 16750
|
3 April 2014, 10:52 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 862
|
I'll be the detractor.....Looks nice but to me you just ruined an insert. Why not source another and keep the original safe?
__________________
Formerly John in SC and John in TN How To: Remove a Tudor Pelagos Endlink in 60 Seconds or Less |
3 April 2014, 11:08 AM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
One reason why I bought this insert with a graduated fade circumferentially. This can't be faked. I don't mind altered inserts as long as they are not sold as genuine.
|
3 April 2014, 11:14 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
|
3 April 2014, 04:15 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Michael
Location: Brussels
Watch: aholic
Posts: 1,108
|
|
3 April 2014, 05:14 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
The problem with bleaching inserts is that you uniformly strip off the satin varnish first, before any pigment gets taken back a few tones. For me, that's the quickest and easiest tell. A good example is the black one, above. Looks nice enough, but a genuine fade is a million times better, IMO.
|
3 April 2014, 05:46 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
Off course genuine fade is better but after my little experiment I feel very satisfied with the results as I managed to get the EXACT look I wanted.
If I didnt say anything and put pics of my watch saying this is my new 37 yr old inset I wonder how many of you would know its been bleached???? I dont think many would know.. Here is more pics I just took.. |
3 April 2014, 05:53 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
What is frightening is if I can have results like that as a NON expert how many people out there are buying insets for $$$$$ thinking they are genuine faded insets??? Food for thought.
|
3 April 2014, 06:48 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
did you also bleach the back of it, or mask that off?
|
3 April 2014, 06:54 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
Vincent I only bleached the Blue half of the inset dipping it(Blue half) in bleach for a few seconds and out straight under running water. Did that a few times until I got colour I wanted... Very surprised at the results, I love that retro old vintage look.
By the way the back of the inset still looks the same colour nothing has faded at the back. |
3 April 2014, 07:03 PM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Quote:
Hi - yes, I already saw you just did the blue bit, so it matches the fade of the red. I think you did a good colour-match job - glad you're happy with the result. Personally, I loved it before, in the first pictures, but that's just my taste. Strange that the back didn't fade too. Anyway, enjoy it! Lovely GMT |
|
3 April 2014, 08:35 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
Accelerated inset fade on my GMT Master 16750..
Hey guys I thought I would share my experience with bleaching my inset on my GMT master 16750 (1980).
I started a thread over on the vintage forum asking what I could do to get a quick accelerated faded look on my inset on my vintage 16750... I have been looking around for weeks trying to get an inset with a nice light blue/red even fade but only saw ones which were either too dark blue with light red or vice versa.. After doing some research and experiments on other metal painted objects I decided to gamble and risk bleaching my inset to try and get that lovely light baby blue fade to match my pink/red on my inset... To say I am ecstatic with the results is an understatement, I manged to get the exact fade I wanted and one that I would have paid $$$$$$ if I happen to see one for sale in that colour.. Here are some pics of my inset before and after my bleaching... Now I know some will be very against such measures or would think I am crazy but I am a very happy guy with the look.. Look fwd to hearing your thoughts. |
3 April 2014, 08:39 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
Have to say that the pics dont do it any justice and looks much nicer in person...
|
3 April 2014, 08:54 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
|
nice...so what's the formula?
|
3 April 2014, 08:59 PM | #48 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,585
|
Looks good. Not sure how I feel about the artificial fade, but it looks nice.
|
3 April 2014, 09:38 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
I'll be honest and say that I'm really on the fence on artificial fading mate. While I see no problem from an enjoyment issue for you, I wonder what the circumstance will be when it is passed on. Disclosure is an issue for all future owners/buyers. I am not saying you personally would pass it off as genuine fading, but perhaps the next owner would...
__________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc |
3 April 2014, 09:42 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
[QUOTE=Cc1966;4854632]I'll be honest and say that I'm really on the fence on artificial fading mate. While I see no problem from an enjoyment issue for you, I wonder what the circumstance will be when it is passed on. Disclosure is an issue for all future owners/buyers. I am not saying you personally would pass it off as genuine fading, but perhaps the next owner would...[/QUOTE
Christopher this watch will stay with me for ever and have no intention on selling it or pretend its natural fade, its for my personal enjoyment and over time it will fade even more naturally and look even better... If I had a choice of 2 gorgeous identical looking women one had droopy natural boobs over time and one had FAKE perky gorgeous looking boobs I know which one I would rather have.. ;-) Goes to show though that people spend hundreds of $ on the perfect faded insets but sometimes its hard to tell whats real and what isnt... |
3 April 2014, 09:43 PM | #51 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
|
Interested to know what you used and how you achieve the level of fade you want without overdoing it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
3 April 2014, 10:00 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
dont tease ,,,, how was it done ,,, if you dont want to share the details ,, just a rough idea , like the end result though
|
3 April 2014, 10:12 PM | #53 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
Quote:
Andy |
|
3 April 2014, 10:41 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
|
3 April 2014, 10:50 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
|
3 April 2014, 10:53 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
A mod will have to do that… dude!
|
3 April 2014, 11:28 PM | #57 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
[QUOTE=Jetkopite;4854640]
Quote:
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
4 April 2014, 12:10 AM | #58 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
|
4 April 2014, 12:15 AM | #59 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,764
|
[QUOTE=springer;4854823]
Haha my thoughts exactly! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me. Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex |
4 April 2014, 12:23 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.