ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 May 2014, 02:14 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Honestly you could easily pull off a 44mm with that wrist.
Does it look too small, only YOU can answer that question. |
2 May 2014, 02:31 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: DD 118206
Posts: 1,858
|
|
2 May 2014, 02:33 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: London - UK
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,249
|
Think it looks fine to me.
|
2 May 2014, 02:47 AM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 6,023
|
|
2 May 2014, 02:49 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 6,023
|
Did you have to add additional links other than what the watch was supplied with?
If you need to order more links to fit, then the watch is too small. This is right on the border. Absolutely no smaller than this. You could easily wear a 48mm or so.... |
2 May 2014, 02:56 AM | #36 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
|
I think it looks perfect. Sure, you could get away with wearing a bigger watch, but what's the need?
|
2 May 2014, 03:03 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mr. Daytona
Location: On the water
Watch: Panerai
Posts: 974
|
You guys with the whole "its too small" thing crack me up.
|
2 May 2014, 04:34 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: Texas
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
Sent from my LG-D801 using Tapatalk
__________________
On IG: robertrussell |
|
2 May 2014, 04:35 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: Texas
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 364
|
I did not*
Sent from my LG-D801 using Tapatalk
__________________
On IG: robertrussell |
2 May 2014, 06:24 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
|
Super!
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
2 May 2014, 06:44 AM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: England
Posts: 514
|
Personally think it looks quite a bit too small, the DSSD will look much better.
|
2 May 2014, 06:46 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
|
2 May 2014, 06:50 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: All over
Posts: 633
|
Looks great on you.
__________________
They don't make people like they used to... |
2 May 2014, 11:19 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Florida, US
Watch: du jour
Posts: 1,815
|
On the smaller side for your wrist, but looks fine. Definitely wouldn't go smaller, as 42-44 mm is probably perfect for you.
|
2 May 2014, 11:22 AM | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Florida
Watch: Hulk, DJ, Bluesy
Posts: 1,890
|
I am clearly missing something.
Has the human wrist become substanially larger in the last couple decades? I have a Sub C and a Tudor, both around 40MM. BUT, I still love me classic 36mm. Datejust. |
2 May 2014, 01:04 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
I don't know how anyone could suggest you wear a larger watch. At 40mm, that looks perfect. Anything larger would seem clumsy, affected. And, a nice DJ with a fluted bezel would look just as good. Smaller, yes, but it would still look fantastic.
Why does everyone think they need a big, chunky watch to make an impression?
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.