ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

fabio1965 · 15 June 2014, 07:32 PM

Go for Daytona.

ahafs1 · 15 June 2014, 07:38 PM

Definitely depends on your budget however I would say a Sub or Daytona

Jack T · 15 June 2014, 09:00 PM

The Sub is most people's default choice for a first Rolex, and that's not bad, but for me, I'd go with the Explorer. It is the most versatile of the three you're considering, it is discreet, durable and simple. This Explorer covers more range on the Sport to Casual to Dress watch continuum than any model in the line. A new 39mm comes with an improved movement and that new bracelet and clasp. None of the others would be a bad choice, this would be a great choice.

rg9390 · 16 June 2014, 01:13 AM

For me, the Daytona, then the sub (date), then explorer 1.

But you really need to go to an AD to try it on! Its impossible to tell just looking at pictures or comments.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mschafer · 16 June 2014, 02:34 AM

For simple usability, readability , stealth and style I would go with an Exp 1, I personally prefer the 36mm, but appreciate the technology of the current generation 39mm. The Daytona is to busy for me and I don't need the chrono function. I could see a Sub date or ND for a more substantial look and poss. Additional usability with a date.

15 June 2014, 09:00 PM	#33
Jack T "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Jack Location: The Triangle Watch: Several Posts: 6,719	The Sub is most people's default choice for a first Rolex, and that's not bad, but for me, I'd go with the Explorer. It is the most versatile of the three you're considering, it is discreet, durable and simple. This Explorer covers more range on the Sport to Casual to Dress watch continuum than any model in the line. A new 39mm comes with an improved movement and that new bracelet and clasp. None of the others would be a bad choice, this would be a great choice. Attached Images __________________ Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT

16 June 2014, 01:13 AM	#34
rg9390 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Sydney, HK Watch: BB58 Blue Posts: 471	For me, the Daytona, then the sub (date), then explorer 1. But you really need to go to an AD to try it on! Its impossible to tell just looking at pictures or comments. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Patek Philippe \| Audemars Piguet \| Vacheron Constantin \| Rolex \| Tudor \| Grand Seiko \| Baume & Mercier \| Bamford London \| Studio Underd0g \| Swatch x Omega \| Swatch x Blancpain \| Casio

15 June 2014, 07:32 PM	#31
fabio1965 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Milano Posts: 120	Go for Daytona.

15 June 2014, 07:38 PM	#32
ahafs1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Dubai, UAE Watch: Patek Aquanaut Posts: 236	Definitely depends on your budget however I would say a Sub or Daytona

16 June 2014, 02:34 AM	#35
mschafer "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: New York Posts: 976	For simple usability, readability , stealth and style I would go with an Exp 1, I personally prefer the 36mm, but appreciate the technology of the current generation 39mm. The Daytona is to busy for me and I don't need the chrono function. I could see a Sub date or ND for a more substantial look and poss. Additional usability with a date.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)