ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Cru Jones · 29 July 2014, 03:59 PM

Best thing about this reference is the reactions to it on this thread.

SamGMT · 29 July 2014, 07:23 PM

They are uglier then my "Beauty Queen"! The Rose Gold really cannot make it!

AK797 · 29 July 2014, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by conkers

As to whether it is nice or not, that's another question! Yes the nickname is Goliath although I have no idea where that came from.

After seeing this watch most people were told to - go-lieth down.

orangedial · 29 July 2014, 10:07 PM

Wonder why this design was approved...
But again, the real watch might be better looking than the press photos (was there even a press announcement?)

steveclocks · 29 July 2014, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

After seeing this watch most people were told to - go-lieth down.

If my name was David I would wear one. Now I luckely don't have to

conkers · 29 July 2014, 10:34 PM

Ok so some strong views, worse or better than the LBJ?

diver2012 · 29 July 2014, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by conkers

Ok so some strong views, worse or better than the LBJ?

I think it's worse.

masterserg · 29 July 2014, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by conkers

Ok so some strong views, worse or better than the LBJ?

I tried the LBJ at the boutique when it was just released and it was actually pretty nice!

These on the other hand ...

conkers · 29 July 2014, 10:59 PM

Ouch, a damning indictment!!!

waspy1 · 29 July 2014, 11:14 PM

Not my cup of tea but can't understand the hate here when so many like the 'volcano'

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Suicide King · 29 July 2014, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orangedial

Wonder why this design was approved...
But again, the real watch might be better looking than the press photos (was there even a press announcement?)

It may be even worse in real life

diver2012 · 29 July 2014, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by waspy1

Not my cup of tea but can't understand the hate here when so many like the 'volcano'

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Really?

Passionata · 29 July 2014, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diver2012

I think it will be a pass for anyone with functioning eyes!

lol

ocwatching · 30 July 2014, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2muchtimeonmyhands

Perhaps if you are a die hard Broncos fan, otherwise I'd pass

LOL...I was just surprised at the color combos..then I read this..now I can't get Broncos out of the watch...

Steel28 · 30 July 2014, 04:01 AM

speechless. Absolutely not. Makes it look very cheap.

sebastien1975 · 30 July 2014, 04:23 AM

Thank God this is a LE

Watchurself · 30 July 2014, 05:45 AM

These. Look. Horrible.

conkers · 30 July 2014, 09:05 AM

Just as well I didn't post my incoming thread.........

texex91 · 30 July 2014, 12:05 PM

I'm glad it's VERY limited. Not for me.

bmpwatch · 30 July 2014, 02:13 PM

ouch....pass!

Hamish · 30 July 2014, 11:03 PM

Not forme

masterserg · 30 July 2014, 11:34 PM

Man, I know this has been discussed ad-nauseam, but I wish they stopped with this LE crap ...

nick c · 31 July 2014, 01:03 AM

There are nice with sunglasses on

yachty 1 · 31 July 2014, 01:08 AM

Love AP, my favorite brand but seriously?

scrappy · 31 July 2014, 02:42 AM

I question whether the incremental profits from this range outweigh the damage that'll be done to AP's credibility.

chas13 · 31 July 2014, 02:52 AM

Whats been seen cannot be unseen

AK797 · 31 July 2014, 05:27 AM

Its probably not that bad in real life, no AP is.

oldbronco · 31 July 2014, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diver2012

i think it will be a pass for anyone with functioning eyes!

+1

bzabodyn · 31 July 2014, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scrappy

I question whether the incremental profits from this range outweigh the damage that'll be done to AP's credibility.

There's been at least a dozen LEs I can think of that I would say the same about but it hasn't seemed to hurt them yet.

BZ

watchdog507 · 31 July 2014, 12:16 PM

The number of watches in the "Goliath" LTD Edition are so few that all of these will find homes with collectors. Attractive or not, there is a lot of money out there and being wealthy has little to do with good taste. I see these as more curiosities than desirables.

30 July 2014, 11:34 PM	#52
masterserg "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Serg Location: US of A Watch: AP Posts: 7,437	Man, I know this has been discussed ad-nauseam, but I wish they stopped with this LE crap ... __________________ How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????

29 July 2014, 03:59 PM	#31
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,300	Best thing about this reference is the reactions to it on this thread.

29 July 2014, 07:23 PM	#32
SamGMT "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Sam Location: Singapore Watch: Audemars Piguet Posts: 1,689	They are uglier then my "Beauty Queen"! The Rose Gold really cannot make it!

29 July 2014, 10:07 PM	#34
orangedial "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Wayne Location: Singapore Watch: AP, PP, Rolex Posts: 1,791	Wonder why this design was approved... But again, the real watch might be better looking than the press photos (was there even a press announcement?)

29 July 2014, 10:34 PM	#36
conkers "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Roger Location: Hong Kong Watch: Too many! Posts: 6,116	Ok so some strong views, worse or better than the LBJ?

29 July 2014, 10:59 PM	#39
conkers "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Roger Location: Hong Kong Watch: Too many! Posts: 6,116	Ouch, a damning indictment!!!

29 July 2014, 11:14 PM	#40
waspy1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Jeff Location: Home! Posts: 1,259	Not my cup of tea but can't understand the hate here when so many like the 'volcano' Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

30 July 2014, 04:01 AM	#45
Steel28 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Canada Watch: BLNR Posts: 1,019	speechless. Absolutely not. Makes it look very cheap.

30 July 2014, 04:23 AM	#46
sebastien1975 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Sebastien Location: South East Asia Posts: 788	Thank God this is a LE

30 July 2014, 05:45 AM	#47
Watchurself "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Virginia Posts: 340	These. Look. Horrible.

30 July 2014, 09:05 AM	#48
conkers "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Roger Location: Hong Kong Watch: Too many! Posts: 6,116	Just as well I didn't post my incoming thread.........

30 July 2014, 12:05 PM	#49
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	I'm glad it's VERY limited. Not for me.

30 July 2014, 02:13 PM	#50
bmpwatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Brad Location: Boston / FL Posts: 679	ouch....pass!

30 July 2014, 11:03 PM	#51
Hamish "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Earth Watch: 5575 Posts: 1,674	Not forme

31 July 2014, 01:03 AM	#53
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	There are nice with sunglasses on

31 July 2014, 01:08 AM	#54
yachty 1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: ny Watch: yacht master Posts: 948	Love AP, my favorite brand but seriously?

31 July 2014, 02:42 AM	#55
scrappy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 623	I question whether the incremental profits from this range outweigh the damage that'll be done to AP's credibility.

31 July 2014, 02:52 AM	#56
chas13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Mark Location: uk Watch: 116500 bk Posts: 94	Whats been seen cannot be unseen

31 July 2014, 05:27 AM	#57
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	Its probably not that bad in real life, no AP is.

31 July 2014, 12:16 PM	#60
watchdog507 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: YYZ, RSW Watch: Rose Gold Posts: 1,675	The number of watches in the "Goliath" LTD Edition are so few that all of these will find homes with collectors. Attractive or not, there is a lot of money out there and being wealthy has little to do with good taste. I see these as more curiosities than desirables.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)