ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Trade LV-C for 116613 LB Smurf | |||
Keep LV-C??? | 53 | 50.00% | |
So long Hulk.... Hello Smurf!!! | 53 | 50.00% | |
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
27 August 2014, 02:35 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
+1.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
27 August 2014, 02:52 PM | #32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
|
Blue
|
27 August 2014, 03:20 PM | #33 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
For me, keep the LVc for sure, as I personally am not a fan of YG on a Sub.
|
27 August 2014, 03:21 PM | #34 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Roll-X-♛
Location: Canada,Mtl
Watch: OUT!!!
Posts: 215
|
Those are the only two watches i have ever bought from Rolex and the first being the TT Bleusy. Love the classic look. However the HULK just felt so nice and was a nice watch to look at. The Ceramic bezel with platinum filler in the number engravings is awesome. GO FOR THE GREEN!!!
|
27 August 2014, 03:37 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
|
If you wanna go blue, go full blue with 116618, or keep the LVc
|
27 August 2014, 07:19 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
If the flat blue on a TT Sub is your thing, then I say go for it. It sounds like a good opportunity to pick one up.
I wouldn't worry that a lot of people prefer the newer sunburst version as you're the one who's going to wear it. Worse case is that you swap it back for the LVc down the track (which I assume will still be able to be bought new quite readily); or Heaven forbid, break your one Sub rule! |
27 August 2014, 07:35 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne
Watch: SEIKO SLA033
Posts: 665
|
I'm not s two tone guy but after seeing both in person, the Smurf is my favourite Sub, by a mile. The LV is nice but not in 'all' lighting. At times the bezel is an off green, whereas the blue is always awesome and goes so well with the yellow gold, so much so I think it's much nicer than the white gold Smurf.
|
27 August 2014, 07:46 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Can you guess?
Location: Texas
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 409
|
Keep the 116610LV unless you are giving it up for the 116619.
__________________
"Comparison is the thief of joy." Theodore Roosevelt 116710LN 116610LV |
27 August 2014, 08:21 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
27 August 2014, 10:20 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
Keep the LVc.
__________________
|
27 August 2014, 10:31 PM | #41 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
Smurf all the way
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
28 August 2014, 12:00 AM | #42 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,787
|
I prefer the LV-C.
|
28 August 2014, 12:19 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Richie
Location: new york
Watch: AP,Rolex
Posts: 114
|
Keep the LVc
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.