ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 May 2008, 08:10 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
Quote:
I wanted your opinion and thanks. Today when I went to Publix to buy tonights dinner I got the senior citizens discount. Maybe the DD will take a decade or two off my looks. |
|
8 May 2008, 08:12 AM | #32 | ||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,939
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
||
8 May 2008, 08:14 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Blunt you say, OK. IMO that example of DD is hideous (tell your wife she's got a great eye) and that PP is also ugly mainly due to the case (I'll never think that flower edge is good looking).
Now BigHat has the right idea w/ his examples of the Lange & VC...both of those watches are to die for IMO!!! If you're going to go w/ PP, I think there a ton of better examples to chose from...but that's just me. Sorry if our tastes are way off...I just would never dish out that kind of $ for the PP you posted. Good luck w/ your decision either way. |
8 May 2008, 08:15 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fort William
Posts: 38
|
I'm not saying they're not fine watches, obviously they're probably the best watches in the world... I just wish they would make some models that at least look like they're from the 20th centuary, let alone the 21st !!!! I'd still think they looked crap even if they cost peanuts, I just don't get why people rave on about them maybe it's the fact they cost so much makes people think they're really good looking watches, bit like the emperors new clothes |
8 May 2008, 08:16 AM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Quote:
|
|
8 May 2008, 08:24 AM | #36 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,939
|
Quote:
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
|
8 May 2008, 08:27 AM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fort William
Posts: 38
|
|
8 May 2008, 08:31 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
Personally, I don't like that particular PP. Get what you want, not what your wife wants for you.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
8 May 2008, 09:54 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
|
This decision depends a lot on what you plan on wearing the watch for. If you have a casual, office job, then then the PP is a great choice. However, if you're more active and plan on wearing the watch for golfing, then the Rolex is a wiser choice.
__________________
|
8 May 2008, 10:23 AM | #40 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: New Hampshire
Watch: 18K DD 118238
Posts: 196
|
Redshirt,
thank you for the compliment on my DD,Otto's, like all of his collection,which is outstanding, is very nice as well (I really like his white dial and Steves diamond dial DD-would be crazyy to own three) I hope thr expamples,along with maybe some others,are able to put the DD 118238's back in the front row .You really have to go try one on before you pull the trigger on anything. You asked for opinions with no holding back and responded to the opinions like a champ Whatever you chose, emphasis on "you chose",you will wear it well and be happy.Great thread and looking forward to seeing your new watch whatever it turns out to be Best, Dave |
8 May 2008, 10:40 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
Thanks for your personal opinions. That is exactly what I wanted. Many times I have given the advice "just buy what you like" to others. Sound advice. In this case I am not sure just what I like and I do not want to make an expensive mistake. One could ask why would I even give a rats turd what others think; he just need to make up his own mind. Well, in this case I am using sage advice that is; when in doubt ask and listen. I have heard and I know my decision. You guys pointed out specifics of each watch that I just have not noticed. Thanks. Off to make a purchase tomorrow.
|
8 May 2008, 11:21 AM | #42 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
|
You know this is a Rolex forum so my advice is going to have that kind of slant.
The Bark DD with timber dial is not to my personal tastes at all, and so I think that was a very poor example of the DD to show your wife in seeking her advice. There are some versions of the DD that look spectacular. A DD isn't just a dress watch either, it has a utilitarian flare to be worn on any occasion and it has the oyster case to give you a level of water resistance comfort. The Patek is a great watch, the leather straps are different than the Rolex metal bracelets. Up to you which you prefer, but the Rolex metal bracelet looks great and wears really well. Go to the shop with the Patek in one hand and the DD in the other and ask yourself which one feels more worthy, I bet you will pick the DD.
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
8 May 2008, 11:24 AM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
Quote:
Perfect response. Thanks to all. |
|
8 May 2008, 11:31 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
That particular Patek looks a little feminine to me.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
8 May 2008, 11:43 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
|
8 May 2008, 11:47 AM | #46 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
|
|
8 May 2008, 11:48 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Real Name: Teton
Location: California
Watch: SS DJ Oyster band
Posts: 67
|
fragility is a problem with all complications. Try changing the time of your Rolex near midnight a few times. How about rapidly starting and stop the chronograph on your Daytona and see what happens? Will the chronograph hands line up anymore? Even the rotating bezels on the subs. If you rotate them one too many times the rachet will no longer click.
The most reliable watch would be somethiing that has just 3 hands, and no moving bezels. -Teton |
8 May 2008, 11:58 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Collegeville PA
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 752
|
Redshirt, the Patek looks a little frail and I've never been fond of the leather strap. I'm suprised you are comparing these 2 watches because they wear totally different. The Patek is very thin and more subtle. The DD is much more hefty so it depends on your style. The DD comes in many different styles...WG/YG/Plat and tons of different dials, bezels, etc...
It sounds like you've made a decision...can't wait to see the pics. Here is mine. YG w/Light Champaign Diamond Dial. |
8 May 2008, 01:35 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
|
I want this one... maybe after the GV and the DSSD
I know it's plain, but I really like this one, in Rose, it's a 5196R.
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment |
8 May 2008, 01:59 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: LONG ISLAND, NY
Watch: 2007 DAY DATE 18KT
Posts: 1,378
|
I have the DD YG 18238 and it is a my Grail watch for sure. I am in the market for the PP 5127R since that does look elegant and certainly worthy of passing down.
But the SIZE of the Rolex makes me want to hold it in my hand and use it as a "tool" to smash the out of the pathetic petite Patek! I just need something SOLID on my wrist!
__________________
ROLEX DAY DATE 118238 (2007) ROLEX DAY DATE 18238 (1997) ROLEX GMT 16750 PEPSI (1987) ROLEX AIR KING 14000 (1991) ROLEX GMTIIC TT 116713LN (2008) |
8 May 2008, 02:52 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,950
|
Tough choice.
Both are outstanding time-pieces, stylish, accurate and meticulously manufactured. Go and try them both, and your question WILL be answered. John. |
8 May 2008, 06:44 PM | #52 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 17
|
Best of luck, Bubba. I was recently in a similar situation with my wife. We went into the AD with an expectation (at least on my part) of picking out a DD, when the next thing I know I'm being dragged by my wife and the salesman to the Patek display. While I didn't like all of their watches, some were certainly tempting. Unfortunately (for my wife, that is), the only one I would have considered seriously (i.e., had the remotest chance of being able to afford) was a manual wind--and I greatly prefer the automatics. So a DD it will be, finances permitting. Ultimately, as others have said, it's to be your watch, but you can't completely ignore the WF (wife factor). Can't wait to see what you end up with. Mike
|
8 May 2008, 07:46 PM | #53 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
I'm a FANATIC kinda Guy. Just interesting with Rolex and no other brand.
But this time, to be honest I must netral to decide between 'em...Well...still DD the WINNAH. lol!!! CHOOSE DD!!! |
9 May 2008, 03:26 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
Bubba, the PP model you show in your original post has a knurled bezel. I think that reference is discontinued. The current reference with a similar function can be found at this link. It's known as a 5134.
It won't fall apart when you clap your hands like some like to say, but it certainly isn't as tough as a Rolex, but then again, it wasn't built to be. The 5134 is indeed a dual timezone watch, but it's a manual wind. No biggie to me, as it just gives one an excuse to interact with the timepiece more often. It will keep excellent time. About +/-2 a day, without a COSC certificate. It's not a DD, but it will keep it's value better. |
9 May 2008, 03:32 AM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
Actually I will be selling mine, A super collectible 3588 automatic Calatrava for about 9k
Retail 38k |
9 May 2008, 09:07 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
Everybody, very honest and to the point comments. Just what I needed. Went to Capetown today and tried both on and ended up buying two. Neither one was a DD or PP. Will post pictures soon. One was a S model (1994 without a date) and the other was a Z and has deen discontinued. Without the sound advice I would have made a mistake and....THANKS TRF! This shall teach the wife to go out of town and leave me with three kids.
|
9 May 2008, 09:26 AM | #57 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: New Hampshire
Watch: 18K DD 118238
Posts: 196
|
Your wifes out of town and you went and bought two Rolex's?
Man I hoped you used her credit card if so your my new hero ! |
9 May 2008, 10:41 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
|
9 May 2008, 11:49 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: California
Watch: R
Posts: 913
|
|
9 May 2008, 11:53 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,073
|
Looking forward to learning the rest of this story.
Pics please.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.