The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 March 2015, 01:30 AM   #31
rollee1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
I would give it a full manual wind first 40 full crown turns clockwise only and test over 5 -10 days setting first with a reliable time source, like say a quartz watch.Then wear as normal say for 8 hours plus a day,check time once daily with same setting source write down loss or gain.Do this for 5-10 days then average out loss or gain.If then still way out of COSC spec take it back for regulation.Even now if watch is a consistent 12 seconds fast its a very accurate watch,and all is needed is simple regulation, consistency is the main factor with any mechanical watch but remember there are 86400 seconds in a day..
That is a great plan, thanks.


My other SD16600 nails time +1s/day right out of the box, and in 3 weeks of wearing gained 8s in total, this sets up the standard for me.

I am surprised that this modern day 'improved' 3186 movement needs a settling down period, I expect it to nail consistency right out of the box.

I agree with everyone's idea, I shall give it a good 3 weeks of daily wear and monitor from there. Since my post 10 hours ago, the watch was sitting in my bench and it slowed 1s during this time.
It looks like it going through its 'break in' period.

To open the case back of a brand new watch for regulation will be my last resort.
After all, my BLNR only started its journey with me less than 36 hours ago.
Perhaps I am too eager?
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted
rollee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 01:41 AM   #32
rolepam312
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: arizona
Posts: 415
All my rolexes run fast ...it's the least accurate of all my watches.....nothing I didn't know before ...I don't understand why a mass produced watches should be that accurate? Surely you didn't get a Rolex for it's time capability ??
rolepam312 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 02:40 AM   #33
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by rollee1 View Post
That is a great plan, thanks.


My other SD16600 nails time +1s/day right out of the box, and in 3 weeks of wearing gained 8s in total, this sets up the standard for me.

I am surprised that this modern day 'improved' 3186 movement needs a settling down period, I expect it to nail consistency right out of the box.

I agree with everyone's idea, I shall give it a good 3 weeks of daily wear and monitor from there. Since my post 10 hours ago, the watch was sitting in my bench and it slowed 1s during this time.
It looks like it going through its 'break in' period.

To open the case back of a brand new watch for regulation will be my last resort.
After all, my BLNR only started its journey with me less than 36 hours ago.
Perhaps I am too eager?
In the real world the cal 3186 is just a modded 3185 and if regulated correctly would give the same accuracy as any of the 3 series movements.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 03:39 AM   #34
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
agreed re: 40 full turns of the crown.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 04:26 AM   #35
Mfrankel2
"TRF" Member
 
Mfrankel2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Marc
Location: New york
Watch: SD43,d-Blue, 16710
Posts: 1,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBluePrince View Post
Sometimes that's just how they are. I've had watches back from RSC service running out of COSC, sent them back for regulating and they've come back still out of COSC.

Unless it's really out like a minute a day or something I wouldn't worry about it unless you have nothing else in life to worry about and really want something to bother you and fret about.
I disagree. Follow your plan (full wind, wear for a few days & note what's happening). If it's still that far off, you're more than twice what spec is and your watch can certainly be regulated (or repaired and then regulated) to be much more accurate than that. YES it's a mechanical watch and YES sometimes these things happen but they happen due to something being wrong & that thing can be corrected
Mfrankel2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 04:31 AM   #36
Mfrankel2
"TRF" Member
 
Mfrankel2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Marc
Location: New york
Watch: SD43,d-Blue, 16710
Posts: 1,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by rollee1 View Post
That is a great plan, thanks.


My other SD16600 nails time +1s/day right out of the box, and in 3 weeks of wearing gained 8s in total, this sets up the standard for me.

I am surprised that this modern day 'improved' 3186 movement needs a settling down period, I expect it to nail consistency right out of the box.

I agree with everyone's idea, I shall give it a good 3 weeks of daily wear and monitor from there. Since my post 10 hours ago, the watch was sitting in my bench and it slowed 1s during this time.
It looks like it going through its 'break in' period.

To open the case back of a brand new watch for regulation will be my last resort.
After all, my BLNR only started its journey with me less than 36 hours ago.
Perhaps I am too eager?
If it needs to be looked at, "opening the back" if done properly is not an issue. A properly equipped and trained person will do it n a clean environment & replace the seal(s) and pressure test it afterwards. There's no "Magic Swiss Air" in there
Mfrankel2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 05:17 AM   #37
SeaDweller50
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
I had the same problem. I pulled the winder fully out and advanced the time forward by approx one week. Then rewound back again. It ran perfectly after that. Don't know why but it did.
SeaDweller50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 08:12 AM   #38
fdm79
"TRF" Member
 
fdm79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 931
Hummm...

My BLNR runs -1 sec / day
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO - Rolex Submariner 116610 LV - Breitling Navitimer 01 Pan-American Bronze Limited Edition AB0121C4/Q605-447A - Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional 3861 (Sapphire) 310.30.42.50.01.002 - Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 41mm Ceramic (Blue) 212.30.41.20.03.001
fdm79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 09:08 AM   #39
rollee1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexplorerII View Post
I had the same problem. I pulled the winder fully out and advanced the time forward by approx one week. Then rewound back again. It ran perfectly after that. Don't know why but it did.

That's a lot of turning! Do you mean the hour hand passing the date cycle 7 times?

This might make sense by loosening up all the gears in the movement, letting lubricants run loose.
Similar to wearing it for a week, and let the watch run and adjust to settle on its own course.

What ever it might be, I am glad to hear yours run perfectly. This is how they are suppose to be.
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted
rollee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 09:35 AM   #40
RollieVerde
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Very Far Away
Posts: 579
Quote:
Originally Posted by travisb View Post
I'd give it a week or so of normal wear to see if things settle in on their own. If not, it's an easy adjustment.
Exactly. Chill out give it at least a week of continuous wear.
RollieVerde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 09:57 AM   #41
I-luv-Rolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NV
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolffram View Post
How do you over wind a Rolex?
Speaking as a mechanical engineer.

A Rolex like all mechanical watch is calibrated to run most accurate during normal use. I.e. it should be most accurate when it is neither fully winded nor almost unwind. It should be most accurate somewhere in the mid wound range.

Not to say the O.P. does not have a problem, but a full wounded watch all the time will run faster. If you don't believe me fully wind you Rolex every hour and compare it to winding it every 48 hours and see if it run faster. Also keeping a spring full winded all the time will also generally shorten the life of the spring. In addition, a Rolex spring is probably design to have a infinite life, however if there is/are unintended flawed in the spring or spring mechanism fully winding a spring will shorten the life of it.

Last edited by I-luv-Rolex; 13 March 2015 at 09:58 AM.. Reason: typo
I-luv-Rolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 10:08 AM   #42
wolffram
"TRF" Member
 
wolffram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Tony
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Watch: 114060
Posts: 289
Just out of interest can you tell if your watch is over wound? I've not tried this, but if you kept on hand winding would you get to a point of resistance or not? All my 2824 watches do, but is a Rolex movement the same? When I bought my Sub the AD wound the crown somewhere between 20 and 40 turns, and said it was not possible to over wind a Rolex- just wondering if this is true or not?
__________________
Rolex SubC 114060
Tudor BB Red 79230R
Tudor BB 58 79030N
wolffram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 10:27 AM   #43
I-luv-Rolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NV
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolffram View Post
Just out of interest can you tell if your watch is over wound? I've not tried this, but if you kept on hand winding would you get to a point of resistance or not? All my 2824 watches do, but is a Rolex movement the same? When I bought my Sub the AD wound the crown somewhere between 20 and 40 turns, and said it was not possible to over wind a Rolex- just wondering if this is true or not?
I think when Rolex says you can't over wind a rolex. It mean that there is either a clutch or ratchet mechanism in the watch so that you can't keeping turning the crown until the spring breaks. There are lessor watch out there that you can wind the watch until the crown stop and if you force to turn the crown beyond that point you will break the spring.
I-luv-Rolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 11:39 AM   #44
RollieVerde
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Very Far Away
Posts: 579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Movements are tested in bulk. They are not in a watch, they do not have dials or hands or the auto-wind modules, they are bare movements. After passing the test they are simply warehoused. They are never tested again, ever. COSC uses standard ISO 3159; each uncased movement is individually tested for fifteen days, in five positions, at three different temperatures. It is the test that allows for a daily variation of -4/+6 (a 10 second swing) during testing; it is not what you should expect your watch to operate at regardless of how many Forum members seem to think that.

When they come out of warehouse, perhaps months later, they are "serviced" and fitted with the parts needed for the intended use, Sub, DJ, etc.
Not tested again after COSC? What's your source? Ariel Adams wrote this after touring the Rolex facility:

"It would be an understatement to suggest that Rolex is obsessive about quality control. A predominant theme in the manufacture is that things are checked, re-checked, and then checked again. It feels as though their goal is to ensure that if a Rolex watch fails, it does so before it leaves the factory. Large teams of watchmakers and assembly people work on every single movement that Rolex produces. This is before and after their movements are sent to COSC for chronometer certification. And on top of that, Rolex re-tests their movements for accuracy after they are cased for several days while simulating wear before they are sent out to retailers."

I don't think they just warehouse it, shove it in a case, pressure test the case and ship it.
RollieVerde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 11:44 AM   #45
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by RollieVerde View Post
Not tested again after COSC? What's your source? Ariel Adams wrote this after touring the Rolex facility:

"It would be an understatement to suggest that Rolex is obsessive about quality control. A predominant theme in the manufacture is that things are checked, re-checked, and then checked again. It feels as though their goal is to ensure that if a Rolex watch fails, it does so before it leaves the factory. Large teams of watchmakers and assembly people work on every single movement that Rolex produces. This is before and after their movements are sent to COSC for chronometer certification. And on top of that, Rolex re-tests their movements for accuracy after they are cased for several days while simulating wear before they are sent out to retailers."

I don't think they just warehouse it, shove it in a case, pressure test the case and ship it.
Bear in mind that this article was written on the back of a free Rolex media tour, and parts of it read like a press release. Just saying.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 01:54 PM   #46
rokosh
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Watch: TT Daytona
Posts: 253
This DJ2 (gratuitous pic included ) was on a winder for about 3 weeks, just checked the time- it's gained around 4 seconds.
A 4 second deviation in 21 days is just mind-boggling
Attached Images
 
rokosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2015, 04:55 PM   #47
wolffram
"TRF" Member
 
wolffram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Tony
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Watch: 114060
Posts: 289
I love that watch. And I love that accuaracy. My SubC runs 5 seconds a day fast.
__________________
Rolex SubC 114060
Tudor BB Red 79230R
Tudor BB 58 79030N
wolffram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 04:11 PM   #48
rollee1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
I monitored my BLNR non-stop (every few hours) since my post

In the beginning, the watch is very sensitive to wrist movements, fluctuating between +4s to +12s like a yo-yo, yet magically did not change (zero) in the morning (sleeping 9 hours dial up)

Last week its running on average +2.5s during the day, then slowed down at night. I averaged out a week of wear, the watch kept +2s for 9 straight days

In the past 24 hours its +1s
The BLNR seems to be alive

I believe the new movement does need time to settle working itself out, magic!
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted
rollee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2015, 09:25 AM   #49
rollee1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
Testing complete, +1s/ 24hours the past 4 days consistent
A red carpet appearance and off to the safe she goes.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted
rollee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2015, 09:54 AM   #50
stil
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: not stil
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex n Omega
Posts: 1,327
Not to add to the OCDness of some of the folks on here but my 14060 had been running at about +2/ day since last summer. Recently it sped up to +5 or so a day no matter how I set it on my night stand at night.

I took it to my AD on Sat who regulated it for free and since then it's only gained 2 seconds.

We'll see how long it lasts. He said it was slow on the machine but obviously in practice it's not...plus I'd rather a watch be on the fast side than slow.
stil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2015, 09:55 AM   #51
stil
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: not stil
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex n Omega
Posts: 1,327
...and that last post was my 200th post!
stil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2015, 10:53 AM   #52
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by RollieVerde View Post
Not tested again after COSC? What's your source? Ariel Adams wrote this after touring the Rolex facility:

"It would be an understatement to suggest that Rolex is obsessive about quality control. A predominant theme in the manufacture is that things are checked, re-checked, and then checked again. It feels as though their goal is to ensure that if a Rolex watch fails, it does so before it leaves the factory. Large teams of watchmakers and assembly people work on every single movement that Rolex produces. This is before and after their movements are sent to COSC for chronometer certification. And on top of that, Rolex re-tests their movements for accuracy after they are cased for several days while simulating wear before they are sent out to retailers."

I don't think they just warehouse it, shove it in a case, pressure test the case and ship it.
Once COSC tested, they are NOT COSC tested again...

COSC isn't Rolex, it's a completely different, independent organization. Rolex sends their bare movements: no dials, no autowinders, no hands, etc., just to be tested for 15 days under controlled conditions of humidity and temperature so that they can bear the name "chronometer" on the dial per Swiss law.

Re-read what you posted again.. Nowhere does it say that they return the movements to COSC to be re-tested by the independent COSC organization.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 02:12 PM   #53
CT3113
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: WA State
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by rollee1 View Post
Testing complete, +1s/ 24hours the past 4 days consistent
A red carpet appearance and off to the safe she goes.
Did it break in on its own, or did you have to take it back to be regulated?

I just got a brand new BLNR... Overnight it was dead on ...but after wearing it all day long... +15-20 seconds.
CT3113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 02:36 PM   #54
rollee1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT3113 View Post
Did it break in on its own, or did you have to take it back to be regulated?

I just got a brand new BLNR... Overnight it was dead on ...but after wearing it all day long... +15-20 seconds.

My BLNR behaved as yours when I first got it, the first sleepover was quite precise, then it started to yo-yo.
I had it sat on my bench unmoved for 4 days, did a full manual wind once at 36 hours; then I wore it like normal. Constantly monitoring its accuracy.

Magically, like the watch is alive it settles on +1/24 hours; I did not take it in, it just nails time on its own. Took some patience, it was difficult
Best of luck, enjoy your beautiful watch
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted
rollee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 02:47 PM   #55
JRT
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 2,308
My BLNR always runs very accurately within the range between -1 to +1 sec in each single day since last June.
JRT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 02:58 PM   #56
CT3113
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: WA State
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by rollee1 View Post
My BLNR behaved as yours when I first got it, the first sleepover was quite precise, then it started to yo-yo.
I had it sat on my bench unmoved for 4 days, did a full manual wind once at 36 hours; then I wore it like normal. Constantly monitoring its accuracy.

Magically, like the watch is alive it settles on +1/24 hours; I did not take it in, it just nails time on its own. Took some patience, it was difficult
Best of luck, enjoy your beautiful watch
Thanks, good to know! I just reset it tonight to test again tomorrow. Was +15 sec yesterday... +20 sec today. If it's still fast I will try letting it run down over the weekend and try it out with a full manual wind.
CT3113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 03:34 PM   #57
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
I'd give it two weeks and time the offset. Then you can either see if it settles or tell the watchmaker the observed offset on your wrist.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 06:24 PM   #58
GermanyMatt
"TRF" Member
 
GermanyMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Matt
Location: Northern VA
Watch: 126711, 126610
Posts: 1,803
My BLNR is ridiculously accurate. I always read those threads about how some wearers were touting accuracy within 1 or 2 seconds a month, and I always thought "B.S." None of my Rolex watches have ever been that accurate. Most have been around +2 or 3 seconds a day, which is totally within COSC. But NO WAY an automatic movement can be that accurate.
But, I've been proven wrong by my own watch. It's dead-on on my wrist, a couple of seconds fast dial up, and a a couple seconds slow crown down. So between wearing it and storing it either crown down or dial up when I'm sleeping (typically alternating), I have managed to keep my watch nearly spot on with www.time.is for nearly a month.
I just checked, and it's currently running -0.5 seconds. I couldn't tell you when I set this watch last.
GermanyMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 06:33 PM   #59
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-luv-Rolex View Post
Speaking as a mechanical engineer.

A Rolex like all mechanical watch is calibrated to run most accurate during normal use. I.e. it should be most accurate when it is neither fully winded nor almost unwind. It should be most accurate somewhere in the mid wound range.

Not to say the O.P. does not have a problem, but a full wounded watch all the time will run faster. If you don't believe me fully wind you Rolex every hour and compare it to winding it every 48 hours and see if it run faster. Also keeping a spring full winded all the time will also generally shorten the life of the spring. In addition, a Rolex spring is probably design to have a infinite life, however if there is/are unintended flawed in the spring or spring mechanism fully winding a spring will shorten the life of it.
The main spring is just a serviceable item and mostly changed as part of normal routine service.And a watch will always keep more accurate time if mainspring is at its peak over all operating power reserve.And as the mainspring is wound by gravity by the swinging pendulum ,when it reaches maximum tension it just slips in the spring barrel.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 11:31 PM   #60
jthop
"TRF" Member
 
jthop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 224
My brand new BLNR was running 8-10 sec fast a day. I took it to RSC Dallas. They put it on their machines and said it's perfect. I told them no, when I wear it it runs very fast.

They asked my permission to do a wrist test. They take off my bracelet and wear the watch for a week or so while they work and keep checking the time. They confirmed it was fast and regulated it.

Now that I have the watch back it runs perfect! At most it is -1 second/week now. I am very very happy.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LN
Rolex GMT 116710BLNR
Rolex Daytona 116520 (White Dial)
jthop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.