ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 April 2015, 06:25 PM | #31 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
I would definitely do it myself. Good luck with your decision.
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum |
17 April 2015, 08:08 PM | #32 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
Personally I would not get that one and find a true 03' Mk1 Y series or early F 03' (preferably Y).
Here is a great link on them: http://www.network54.com/Forum/20759...ary+Submariner
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
17 April 2015, 09:43 PM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
|
17 April 2015, 09:44 PM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Spaniard inRussia
Posts: 989
|
Quote:
Only Y series and early F series are the collectible Rolex Lv? Usually I've heard the people to talk about Mark I, not Mark I serial Y or early F. I can understand that the Y series was the first one, but I guess that the important thing is that all the details to be a MarkI are in the dial. Mark 1, Oval 'O', 'R' in 'Oyster' aligned with gap between left and right feet of 'R' in 'Rolex', '5 Ticks', Flat 4 (2003 Issue Models ONLY), From Y966xxx 19 September 2003 To F068XXX November 2003 Mark 1, Oval 'O', 'R' in 'Oyster' aligned with gap between left and right feet of 'R' in 'Rolex', '5 Ticks', Flat 4 (2004 Onwards) From F100000/F110000??? F Serial Late October 2004 To ??????? Regards |
|
17 April 2015, 10:06 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 6,025
|
|
17 April 2015, 10:09 PM | #36 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,303
|
|
17 April 2015, 10:31 PM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
|
17 April 2015, 10:34 PM | #38 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,303
|
|
17 April 2015, 10:37 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
|
I am a huge fan of the LV so I say go for it. It seems others have chimed in about the money and while I think " collectibility" is something to consider I say condition and complete is more important to me. As long as the money is in line with the market.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 April 2015, 11:08 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
Yeah...do it
__________________
too much into watches... |
17 April 2015, 11:55 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Spaniard inRussia
Posts: 989
|
Well, everything is ready for tomorrow. Definitely if I'll buy it I'll share some photos.
I hope looks perfect like in the photos. Thanks! |
17 April 2015, 11:59 PM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
|
18 April 2015, 12:11 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Spaniard inRussia
Posts: 989
|
|
18 April 2015, 12:16 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
__________________
|
18 April 2015, 12:18 AM | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
|
18 April 2015, 12:25 AM | #46 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Michael
Location: Akron, Ohio
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 57
|
I get the nostalgia of the old school watches from Rolex. However, I can't stand the bracelets as I feel they are very cheaply made. I personally wouldn't buy one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 April 2015, 03:46 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
|
I will do it immediately
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.