ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

CPTL · 30 April 2015, 09:42 AM

One of the reasons I flipped my sub for the GMT-II was I preferred the lighter weight and thinner case. I use my watch for everything, to include open-ocean swims, but would never dive below maybe 25 feet (so the WR wasn't a consideration).

Of course, Rolex builds watches that go to 4k because they can. It's no more "necessary" than it is for you to have a $8k watch to tell the time and date.

30 April 2015, 09:42 AM	#1
CPTL "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Kevin Location: Texas on my mind Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ Posts: 2,445	One of the reasons I flipped my sub for the GMT-II was I preferred the lighter weight and thinner case. I use my watch for everything, to include open-ocean swims, but would never dive below maybe 25 feet (so the WR wasn't a consideration). Of course, Rolex builds watches that go to 4k because they can. It's no more "necessary" than it is for you to have a $8k watch to tell the time and date.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)