The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 June 2008, 03:53 AM   #31
Hamilton Carvalho
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,225
JP, the manager of the RSC in New York once told me that a watch needs at least 3 months to settle in. He told me that because I was not happy that my watch was loosing 3 to 4 seconds a day. Anyway, he just repeated what I've heard before, but, I just wanted my watch to be perfect. Like Bo once told me "nothing is perfect in this world but, Rolex is pretty close to that".

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPP View Post
An eight month "wear in" period...?

Come on guys - doesn't matter how experienced some members are here or not. Every watchmaker I have ever met in person or read on the net says the same thing: "the so called 'settle in' period is a fallacy".

That's not to say that the watch will not be affected by other factors however.

Why do people so want there to be a settle in period? I don't understand.

If someone can point me in the direction of a watchmaker who says that in his or her experience there is indeed a settle or wear in period then do send me a link or telephone number or post them here as would be intrigued to hear...
Hamilton Carvalho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2008, 05:49 AM   #32
JPP
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamilton Carvalho View Post
JP, the manager of the RSC in New York once told me that a watch needs at least 3 months to settle in. He told me that because I was not happy that my watch was loosing 3 to 4 seconds a day. Anyway, he just repeated what I've heard before, but, I just wanted my watch to be perfect. Like Bo once told me "nothing is perfect in this world but, Rolex is pretty close to that".
Hey Hamilton

Of course Rolex say that - some Rolex service centre guy told me that it would take 2 years to settle in. It is in Rolex interest not to be regulating every watch they sell for obvious reasons - hence the fact that they will tell you various times. And the Rolex service man who told me 2 years is extremely bad as at 2 years that's when the warranty ends and you have to pay to have your watch regulated...

JP
JPP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2008, 11:48 PM   #33
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamilton Carvalho View Post
It is loosing about 4.3 seconds per day, so, it is within the COSC specifications. (...)
Well, strictly taken, it is indeed NOT within COSC specs. It is .3 secs. off specs since COSC specs are minus 4 to plus 6 secs./day.

About the "settling in" period: It's a matter of the watch adjusted to your personal wearing habits and not a question of the "oils being spread well" or "parts having to be broken in first" (and other myths like that).

Wear the watch for a month's time and see how the accuracy is after that. If the watch is consistantly losing or gaining too much (i.e.: beyond COSC specs), have it regulated to fit your wearing habits.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2008, 12:36 AM   #34
dkpw
"TRF" Member
 
dkpw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: Scotland
Watch: 16610 & 214270
Posts: 1,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
About the "settling in" period: It's a matter of the watch adjusted to your personal wearing habits and not a question of the "oils being spread well" or "parts having to be broken in first" (and other myths like that).

Wear the watch for a month's time and see how the accuracy is after that. If the watch is consistently losing or gaining too much (i.e.: beyond COSC specs), have it regulated to fit your wearing habits.
Thank you Bo for your confirmation and definition of the settling in period.

From this thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
And don't forget that raw machined pivot points and jewel bearings, pinions and gears need to 'wear-in' as they are mated surfaces..
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
I agree 100 % with every of your points! Those points are the exact reason as to there is indeed a settling in period. The most important point is "wearing habits", though, imho.
EDIT: Please note that the second quote from Bo is in relation to the OP in the above thread and not as a direct response to Tool's quote. I was merely attempting to show that two of the most respected members on the forum are in agreement.
__________________
Sub 16610, Explorer 214270, Ω Speedy Pro & many others.

David
dkpw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2008, 12:59 AM   #35
Hamilton Carvalho
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,225
Ok Bo, if that's important I should've been more specific with my comments on my reply to his post. I just felt it was unnecessary to panic him over - .3 seconds. Frankly, I believe - .3 is too little to worry about. My SD is currently 7 seconds ahead of time and the manager at the RSC in New York adviced me NOT to service the watch at this time. I think he should give sometime and give his watch a chance to work better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
Well, strictly taken, it is indeed NOT within COSC specs. It is .3 secs. off specs since COSC specs are minus 4 to plus 6 secs./day.

About the "settling in" period: It's a matter of the watch adjusted to your personal wearing habits and not a question of the "oils being spread well" or "parts having to be broken in first" (and other myths like that).

Wear the watch for a month's time and see how the accuracy is after that. If the watch is consistantly losing or gaining too much (i.e.: beyond COSC specs), have it regulated to fit your wearing habits.
Hamilton Carvalho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2008, 01:20 AM   #36
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Agreed, Hamilton!

.3 secs. aren't really much. I cannot even see how much figures out that a watch is precisely "x.3" secs. slow or fast a day.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2008, 04:47 AM   #37
JPP
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkpw View Post
Thank you Bo for your confirmation and definition of the settling in period.

From this thread.





EDIT: Please note that the second quote from Bo is in relation to the OP in the above thread and not as a direct response to Tool's quote. I was merely attempting to show that two of the most respected members on the forum are in agreement.
???

Don't both these posts you've quoted say that there IS a settling in period - one because of the gears etc and one with the proviso that wearing habits are a key factor...

And then the settling in period is denied in this thread...

No wonder there's so much confusion on the net! Even I'm confused.

Best piece of advice is - if the watch isn't telling the time to your satisfaction whether it's within COSC's specs or not then have it regulated. The only specs that matter are the ones you yourself set - you paid the moolah after all and it's your watch - you're the one who has to tell the time off of it. One man's specs is another man's missed train...hehehe
JPP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2008, 06:22 AM   #38
Hamilton Carvalho
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,225
Like religion and politics, we all have different opinion and interpretation and confusion attracts our curiosity. To know the truth is to know everything.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPP View Post
???

Don't both these posts you've quoted say that there IS a settling in period - one because of the gears etc and one with the proviso that wearing habits are a key factor...

And then the settling in period is denied in this thread...

No wonder there's so much confusion on the net! Even I'm confused.

Best piece of advice is - if the watch isn't telling the time to your satisfaction whether it's within COSC's specs or not then have it regulated. The only specs that matter are the ones you yourself set - you paid the moolah after all and it's your watch - you're the one who has to tell the time off of it. One man's specs is another man's missed train...hehehe
Hamilton Carvalho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2008, 06:26 AM   #39
unclesallie
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
unclesallie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
Get It Regulated For Free Over Lunch

Hamilton: it's under warranty; take it over to the NY RSC and get it regulated...have lunch, come back and your watch will run 'spot on' thereafter. If not, ask them to re-regulate it, until they get it right. No reason to be unhappy with your rolex...
best,
dan
unclesallie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.