ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

BiG JeEzY · 19 June 2008, 11:13 AM

I vote for the GMT II-C and Sub LV over the Daytona as well.

sea-dweller · 19 June 2008, 11:39 AM

LV and GMT II C

rescue7 · 19 June 2008, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by taylor

Would you rather get a new SS daytona that you could not flip (don't ask why)

or

both a new LV and a new GMT-IIC

How bout this, I'll take all 3 and call it a day,

and the GMT IIc is a TT.

sounds like a great collection.

oneillba · 19 June 2008, 03:34 PM

Two pair -- wins!

jasonbellevue · 19 June 2008, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BiG JeEzY

I vote for the GMT II-C and Sub LV over the Daytona as well.

Me too!

badsmac · 19 June 2008, 03:48 PM

Well, I'm going to have to go with the flow. I agree. Two are better than one!

Timber Loftis · 19 June 2008, 03:51 PM

I note that you can only wear one at a time.

boa2 · 19 June 2008, 03:51 PM

Tough call. Probably the Daytona for me. I don't know how any watch can be considered overrated if you love it.

The Kermit & GMTIIc are both supreme watches as well. It's just that after a week of wearing the Daytona, I was absolutely smitten. Either way, I'd rather have fewer of what I love than more of what I like.

Felly Jr. · 19 June 2008, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boa2

Tough call. Probably the Daytona for me. I don't know how any watch can be considered overrated if you love it.

The Kermit & GMTIIc are both supreme watches as well. It's just that after a week of wearing the Daytona, I was absolutely smitten. Either way, I'd rather have fewer of what I love than more of what I like.

Ditto, same here.

wrxsti · 19 June 2008, 04:44 PM

not to bash daytona owners but as said before it is overated. The only daytona I would wear would be the paul newman vintage. The gmt and sub is the way to go!

BigHat · 19 June 2008, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolexSoFla

Let us know when you get one, put it on and wear it for a while. I think you'll change your mind.

Too late. Wore one for six months and it bored me to death. That is NOT to say I didn't admire the movement (mine was a great time keeper) and heritage, it was just "blah" to me. When I need or want a chrono I grab a VC OS, Concord (El Primero), or my Oakley.

I am much happier to have a YG Bluesy I flipped the Daytona for about a month ago.

SPACE-DWELLER · 19 June 2008, 11:55 PM

My vote goes to the LV and GMT IIc, as well!

19 June 2008, 11:13 AM	#31
BiG JeEzY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jerome Location: N. California Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ Posts: 3,351	I vote for the GMT II-C and Sub LV over the Daytona as well. __________________ -Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial

19 June 2008, 03:34 PM	#34
oneillba "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Brian Location: Hamilton, MI USA Watch: My beloved TT DJ Posts: 3,831	Two pair -- wins! __________________ My Trusty TT DJ

19 June 2008, 03:51 PM	#38
boa2 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Howard Location: Utah Watch: Lover Posts: 3,939	Tough call. Probably the Daytona for me. I don't know how any watch can be considered overrated if you love it. The Kermit & GMTIIc are both supreme watches as well. It's just that after a week of wearing the Daytona, I was absolutely smitten. Either way, I'd rather have fewer of what I love than more of what I like. __________________ "Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."

19 June 2008, 11:55 PM	#42
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	My vote goes to the LV and GMT IIc, as well! __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

19 June 2008, 11:39 AM	#32
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	LV and GMT II C

19 June 2008, 03:48 PM	#36
badsmac Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Brian Location: Mansfield,TX Watch: Rolex SS Sub Posts: 480	Well, I'm going to have to go with the flow. I agree. Two are better than one!

19 June 2008, 03:51 PM	#37
Timber Loftis "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Jon Location: Chicago Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z Posts: 2,857	I note that you can only wear one at a time.

19 June 2008, 04:44 PM	#40
wrxsti "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Earth Posts: 1,695	not to bash daytona owners but as said before it is overated. The only daytona I would wear would be the paul newman vintage. The gmt and sub is the way to go!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)