ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 December 2015, 11:42 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
|
For the age, the watch case looks pretty good.
|
1 December 2015, 11:58 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
You got me to looking at mine. My 16710 Z serial lugs (Polished previously by RCS) barely perceptible difference from crown vs non crown side. Slightly narrower on crown side, but difficult to see the very slight difference. Seems that's normal from pics of unpolished cases of later Z and M 16710's I've seen. Yours looks same. My Daytona and Explorer both unpolished, noticeable wider on non crown side. My Tudor 79090- uses a Rolex 1680 case - just the opposite, very noticeably wider on Crown side than non crown side. Again lots of pics and anecdotal talk indicating that to be correct. Maybe an over 50 year designed case, as its been suggested here all Rolex sports slightly narrower on crown side past 50 years. That seems not be the case with the 1680 case.
The anti polishing types, I refer to them a lugites , have taken this polishing vs, non polishing issue to extremes. It started gaining momentum on another forum and recently spilled over here. I've seen cases sanded by hand with 800 grit and machine polished with no discernable case or lug issues, other than deep scratches removed. Here is a balanced view point on the subject. Enjoy your watch it looks great! http://www.bernardwatch.com/blog/to-...sh-your-watch/ |
1 December 2015, 12:10 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
Here is a great example of how to refinish a case, just stay away from machines, other than for applying polishing compounds. You can avoid any machines by using lapping paper and compounds. http://www.clockmaker.com.au/rolex/r...polishing.html
|
1 December 2015, 12:13 PM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jason
Location: FL390
Posts: 2,376
|
Quote:
I think I actualy fall somewhere in between the two sides of this argument.
__________________
It's not about the watch a man wears, it's about what a man does while he's wearing the watch....Toomuchtalk |
|
1 December 2015, 01:05 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
|
|
1 December 2015, 09:30 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Daz
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 214
|
Brother looks fine, just wear in good health .......
__________________
Rolex / 116610, 116710, 116713, 116613 x 2 / AP ROO Panda 44 / AP LBJ / Panerai Pam 321 Pam 312 " If your Important People will wait " |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.