ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RICHARD_LEWIS · 7 January 2016, 10:02 PM

I think that watch should be called the Floyd Skyweather!

Rolex addict · 7 January 2016, 10:04 PM

Some Hollywood or music star would love it.

kilyung · 7 January 2016, 10:12 PM

Well you don't have to worry about scratches.

Mick P · 7 January 2016, 10:20 PM

Chaps

The appearance of a Rolex is very subjective and made a lot worse by the fact that it has a large chunky bracelet.

In my opinion (please not I said in my opinion) Rolex SS models look good. Form follows function, it looks cool and is relatively under the radar. It is what Rolex is all about.

Then there is yellow gold which in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks vulgar because it screams Rolex. (Please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.)

TT in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks like it was designed to be worn by a pimp. Sorry but it is neither fish nor fowl and looks unbalanced. (please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.)

Diamonds on a mans watch are beyond comment.

This is my very very very humble and worthless opinion and I mean to offend no person be they a Rolex wearer or a Forum Moderator. I am but a humble man who thinks that a SS Rolex watch is total perfection and is how it was meant to be.

I suspect, however, I am not alone in my opinions.

Regards

Mick

travisb · 7 January 2016, 10:27 PM

Yuk. I could picture it on Floyd Mayweather though.

AK797 · 7 January 2016, 10:33 PM

Nothing's gonna hurt me with my eyes shut...

cdmorenot · 7 January 2016, 10:36 PM

To each their own.

beshannon · 7 January 2016, 10:36 PM

I did not like it before it was ruined

brandrea · 7 January 2016, 10:38 PM

Not my cup of tea.

kilyung · 7 January 2016, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick P

Chaps

The appearance of a Rolex is very subjective and made a lot worse by the fact that it has a large chunky bracelet.

In my opinion (please not I said in my opinion) Rolex SS models look good. Form follows function, it looks cool and is relatively under the radar. It is what Rolex is all about.

Then there is yellow gold which in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks vulgar because it screams Rolex. (Please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.)

TT in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks like it was designed to be worn by a pimp. Sorry but it is neither fish nor fowl and looks unbalanced. (please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.)

Diamonds on a mans watch are beyond comment.

This is my very very very humble and worthless opinion and I mean to offend no person be they a Rolex wearer or a Forum Moderator. I am but a humble man who thinks that a SS Rolex watch is total perfection and is how it was meant to be.

I suspect, however, I am not alone in my opinions.

Regards

Mick

The greatest selling model Rolex has ever sold (supposedly) is the TT DJ. Furthermore in this day and age, gold toned watches abound from Diesel to Michael Kors... many of which are similar in styling to Rolex. So you may not be alone in your opinion (especially here on TRF where the SS sports crowd dominate) but probably in the minority in the real world.

subtona · 7 January 2016, 11:03 PM

Mayweather is that you?

beer · 7 January 2016, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick P

Chaps

The appearance of a Rolex is very subjective and made a lot worse by the fact that it has a large chunky bracelet.

In my opinion (please not I said in my opinion) Rolex SS models look good. Form follows function, it looks cool and is relatively under the radar. It is what Rolex is all about.

Then there is yellow gold which in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks vulgar because it screams Rolex. (Please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.)

TT in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks like it was designed to be worn by a pimp. Sorry but it is neither fish nor fowl and looks unbalanced. (please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.)

Diamonds on a mans watch are beyond comment.

This is my very very very humble and worthless opinion and I mean to offend no person be they a Rolex wearer or a Forum Moderator. I am but a humble man who thinks that a SS Rolex watch is total perfection and is how it was meant to be.

I suspect, however, I am not alone in my opinions.

Regards

Mick

agree with you when it comes to sport watches - gold contradicts the idea of a tool watch; but imo the DD has a place and the DateJust belongs in two tone

as for the sky dweller not really sure what to make of it..what is it?

it is a sport watch? it doesn't look like a dress watch

it would look good in steel in my opinion

J!m · 8 January 2016, 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Well you don't have to worry about scratches.

That's what I was going to say- very practcal to protect the soft gold from scratches.

Colina19 · 8 January 2016, 12:21 AM

Its not a Rolex unless it looks like that.

J/K

jwill051 · 8 January 2016, 12:29 AM

That is just plain awful!!

TripleB Boston · 8 January 2016, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wcdhtwn

Tool watch becomes a tools watch.

Ha!

At least there are no mods to the dial.

shortstop · 8 January 2016, 12:37 AM

Meth kingpin's bling.

How else can you spend the money? You can't put that much cash in the bank. It will eventually be seized and auctioned off. Everybody can have their chance on it then.

HiloBeMagical · 8 January 2016, 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malbolge

But lets make this topic interesting fellas. How could you salvage this?

...

silverbullet818 · 8 January 2016, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick P

Chaps

The appearance of a Rolex is very subjective and made a lot worse by the fact that it has a large chunky bracelet.

In my opinion (please not I said in my opinion) Rolex SS models look good. Form follows function, it looks cool and is relatively under the radar. It is what Rolex is all about.

Then there is yellow gold which in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks vulgar because it screams Rolex. (Please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.)

TT in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks like it was designed to be worn by a pimp. Sorry but it is neither fish nor fowl and looks unbalanced. (please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.)

Diamonds on a mans watch are beyond comment.

This is my very very very humble and worthless opinion and I mean to offend no person be they a Rolex wearer or a Forum Moderator. I am but a humble man who thinks that a SS Rolex watch is total perfection and is how it was meant to be.

I suspect, however, I am not alone in my opinions.

Regards

Mick

What about WG and Plat? These IMO are 'upgrades' to SS!!

jrs146 · 8 January 2016, 01:52 AM

There is something for everyone - but this is not for me

SWISSAHOLICS · 8 January 2016, 01:54 AM

Pass

Loevhagen · 8 January 2016, 02:18 AM

Flying under the radar.

cruise_bone · 8 January 2016, 02:21 AM

As I've said on other similar watches here, That is a lot of Tacky and Trashy.

kmac71 · 8 January 2016, 02:21 AM

def a little too much for me for sure........too much bling bling.

The Joker · 8 January 2016, 02:31 AM

Does the bezel still turn, doesn't it do this to set the calendar.

kirksingleton · 8 January 2016, 02:48 AM

i wouldn't wear it

crippy1082 · 8 January 2016, 02:59 AM

Totally ruined...should have had more diamonds!

T. Ferguson · 8 January 2016, 03:01 AM

It's a little over the top for me to pull off. Now perhaps in rose gold...

Jim Smyth · 8 January 2016, 03:28 AM

Snoop Dog Say's.........

123Blueface · 8 January 2016, 03:36 AM

Not for me but I do crack up at all the folks that go out of their way on threads like this to post bashing it and probably before anything, first and foremost, even before you can consider for one second actually purchasing it, you can't afford it!!!

7 January 2016, 10:36 PM	#38
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	I did not like it before it was ruined __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

7 January 2016, 11:03 PM	#41
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,599	Mayweather is that you? __________________

8 January 2016, 01:52 AM	#50
jrs146 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Josh Location: Lost in time Watch: Me Nae Nae Posts: 9,823	There is something for everyone - but this is not for me __________________ "Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter

8 January 2016, 01:54 AM	#51
SWISSAHOLICS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Here! Watch: Rolex Posts: 4,366	Pass __________________ 16610LN \| 16613LB \| 16710 Pepsi \| 118238 \| 116500 (White) \| 116500 (Black) \| 116710BLNR \| 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."

8 January 2016, 03:01 AM	#58
T. Ferguson "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Left Coast Posts: 7,025	It's a little over the top for me to pull off. Now perhaps in rose gold... __________________ *Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.*

7 January 2016, 10:02 PM	#31
RICHARD_LEWIS "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: London Watch: 116610LV Posts: 482	I think that watch should be called the Floyd Skyweather!

7 January 2016, 10:04 PM	#32
Rolex addict Banned Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: The Enabler Location: South Cackalacky Watch: me crash my bike Posts: 5,564	Some Hollywood or music star would love it.

7 January 2016, 10:12 PM	#33
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	Well you don't have to worry about scratches.

7 January 2016, 10:20 PM	#34
Mick P Banned Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: UK / Spain Watch: 39mm Explorer Posts: 1,990	Chaps The appearance of a Rolex is very subjective and made a lot worse by the fact that it has a large chunky bracelet. In my opinion (please not I said in my opinion) Rolex SS models look good. Form follows function, it looks cool and is relatively under the radar. It is what Rolex is all about. Then there is yellow gold which in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks vulgar because it screams Rolex. (Please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.) TT in my very very very humble and worthless opinion looks like it was designed to be worn by a pimp. Sorry but it is neither fish nor fowl and looks unbalanced. (please note I did say in my very very very humble and worthless opinion.) Diamonds on a mans watch are beyond comment. This is my very very very humble and worthless opinion and I mean to offend no person be they a Rolex wearer or a Forum Moderator. I am but a humble man who thinks that a SS Rolex watch is total perfection and is how it was meant to be. I suspect, however, I am not alone in my opinions. Regards Mick

7 January 2016, 10:27 PM	#35
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,493	Yuk. I could picture it on Floyd Mayweather though.

7 January 2016, 10:33 PM	#36
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	Nothing's gonna hurt me with my eyes shut...

7 January 2016, 10:36 PM	#37
cdmorenot 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Real Name: Carlos. Location: NNJ - MDE Watch: = Want them all. Posts: 3,697	To each their own.

7 January 2016, 10:38 PM	#39
brandrea 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 78,113	Not my cup of tea.

8 January 2016, 12:21 AM	#44
Colina19 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Cooper City, FL Posts: 158	Its not a Rolex unless it looks like that. J/K

8 January 2016, 12:29 AM	#45
jwill051 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Jim Location: Maine & Florida Watch: 16710,116619 Posts: 540	That is just plain awful!!

8 January 2016, 12:37 AM	#47
shortstop "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: East of Eden Posts: 11	Meth kingpin's bling. How else can you spend the money? You can't put that much cash in the bank. It will eventually be seized and auctioned off. Everybody can have their chance on it then.

8 January 2016, 02:18 AM	#52
Loevhagen "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: The aperture Posts: 4,941	Flying under the radar.

8 January 2016, 02:21 AM	#53
cruise_bone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: John Location: Atlanta Posts: 982	As I've said on other similar watches here, That is a lot of Tacky and Trashy.

8 January 2016, 02:21 AM	#54
kmac71 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Real Name: Kevin Location: Glastonbury, CT Watch: DSSD Cameron Posts: 10	def a little too much for me for sure........too much bling bling.

8 January 2016, 02:31 AM	#55
The Joker "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Gotham Posts: 9,641	Does the bezel still turn, doesn't it do this to set the calendar.

8 January 2016, 02:48 AM	#56
kirksingleton "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,759	i wouldn't wear it

8 January 2016, 02:59 AM	#57
crippy1082 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Chip Location: SoFlo Watch: 116520, BLNR Posts: 37	Totally ruined...should have had more diamonds!

8 January 2016, 03:28 AM	#59
Jim Smyth Banned Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: Jim Smyth Location: Florida Watch: DD Posts: 1,842	Snoop Dog Say's......... Attached Images

8 January 2016, 03:36 AM	#60
123Blueface "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: USA Watch: All Posts: 5,316	Not for me but I do crack up at all the folks that go out of their way on threads like this to post bashing it and probably before anything, first and foremost, even before you can consider for one second actually purchasing it, you can't afford it!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)