The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 March 2016, 11:22 PM   #31
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
That's because it looks like a sub
Bingo!
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2016, 11:23 PM   #32
lhanddds
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
I wish it had solid black subdials and I wish the bezel was thinner mimicking bakelite. We waited for a long time and all we got was a ceramic bezel. That's not very creative. I'm happy we have a nice option in SS and maybe it will grow on me. I think it's the best looking Daytona in the lineup.
lhanddds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2016, 11:33 PM   #33
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
I too wish Rolex had come out with a true Panda and a PN dial.
I know most would not approve, but it I were to go SS Daytona.
I would go aftermarket dial and bezel.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2016, 11:51 PM   #34
RedCarrot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Ben
Location: Boston
Watch: YM 116622
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by goog53 View Post
The ceramic bezel is a no brainer for this piece and something all of us have been wanting for years. I liked the fact that Rolex kept the dimensions at 40mm and decided not to add a date wheel no matter how many people asked for it BUT I wish they would've made the subdials a solid color and ditched the rings. It really makes the watch pop! Not much has been changed to the dial which is disappointing to me. I used to own a 6263 and if they copied that dial design IMO the piece would've been PERFECT. Maybe I am just too picky. I'll keep dreaming that they release a later version some day with a tribute to the Paul Newman dial. That would be the ultimate modern day Daytona (Pic is of my old 6263)
I am absolutely certain you are not the only one that doesn't love it. Some might in fact think it's total poo poo. It is an absolute that not one design could please everyone, or else we wouldn't be individuals.

I personally LOVE it and am on a wait list. Yet even then there's one design element that slightly nags me but many or most find endearing. I give it a three run homer, not a grand slam.
RedCarrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 12:48 AM   #35
JD521
"TRF" Member
 
JD521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
It is indeed a great new Daytona, one that many of us (including myself) have been speculating about and waiting for. And honestly, some didn't think would come. A panda dial would have been spectacular and would have sealed the deal for me. Don't get me wrong, I still think it's a nice looking watch...I'm on a list at my AD for the white one! But I would need to see these in the flesh before making the purchase.
JD521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 01:02 AM   #36
anothernewphone
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
I have always admired the ceramic bezels on the PM Daytonas, so I'm not sure why this one feels so different on the white-dialed SS Daytona. It feels overpowering, sort of a clash of styles. The black one looks fantastic, though, I and I could see myself getting one in about 20 years.
anothernewphone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 01:07 AM   #37
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by anothernewphone View Post
I have always admired the ceramic bezels on the PM Daytonas, so I'm not sure why this one feels so different on the white-dialed SS Daytona. It feels overpowering, sort of a clash of styles. The black one looks fantastic, though, I and I could see myself getting one in about 20 years.
There are no Paul Newman dials on modern Daytonas from Rolex
There are some aftermarket PM dials from various dealers and on eBay.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 01:11 AM   #38
jmpille
"TRF" Member
 
jmpille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Connecticut, USA
Watch: 116520
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by landroverking View Post
There are no Paul Newman dials on modern Daytonas from Rolex
There are some aftermarket PM dials from various dealers and on eBay.
PM=Precious Metal
jmpille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 01:17 AM   #39
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by goog53 View Post
The ceramic bezel is a no brainer for this piece and something all of us have been wanting for years. I liked the fact that Rolex kept the dimensions at 40mm and decided not to add a date wheel no matter how many people asked for it BUT I wish they would've made the subdials a solid color and ditched the rings. It really makes the watch pop! Not much has been changed to the dial which is disappointing to me. I used to own a 6263 and if they copied that dial design IMO the piece would've been PERFECT. Maybe I am just too picky. I'll keep dreaming that they release a later version some day with a tribute to the Paul Newman dial. That would be the ultimate modern day Daytona (Pic is of my old 6263)
That is a great looking vintage Daytona. But I'm grateful Rolex doesn't do tribute pieces. The past is past.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 02:10 AM   #40
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmpille View Post
PM=Precious Metal
Sorry brain dead this morning. Sick all night.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 02:49 AM   #41
mps354
2024 Pledge Member
 
mps354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,099
I would have loved to have seen the black version get full white sub dials, or at least white rings. But, all in all, I think it was a solid release
mps354 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 03:01 AM   #42
dabbotjordan
"TRF" Member
 
dabbotjordan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: Nice
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 752
It is a beautiful watch,no denying that! The old Daytona wasn't for me,afraid the new version isn't either!
dabbotjordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 03:02 AM   #43
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
I realized what I don't love about the new version. The SS bezel model was all bling - pcls, polished case, light register surrounds, and shiny bezel. It made for a really dressy sport watch. The new model is much more sporty with the black bezel and surrounds, but it still has the vestigial bling of the case and pcls. It makes for a somewhat incongruent design imo. Had they gone back to a brushed case, the redesign would have ended up fully sporty - just like the zenith models that everyone loves.

The new model would make a great daily wearer, but I think I might like the current less versital model better.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 03:02 AM   #44
997.2
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Chaz
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 2,721
Sorry you feel this way. :'(
Hope you can get over it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
997.2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 05:18 AM   #45
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Am I the only one who doesn't LOVE the new ceramic Daytona? (Not Trolling)

I m sorry but it reminds me for a low end Seiko chrono ,ceramic works perfectly with the Platona but on these SS versions the contrast is just too strong for me.
At least one person shorter waiting list
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 05:38 AM   #46
sunspot2013
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: NOVA
Watch: Sub/Daytona/GMTII
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
I realized what I don't love about the new version. The SS bezel model was all bling - pcls, polished case, light register surrounds, and shiny bezel. It made for a really dressy sport watch. The new model is much more sporty with the black bezel and surrounds, but it still has the vestigial bling of the case and pcls. It makes for a somewhat incongruent design imo. Had they gone back to a brushed case, the redesign would have ended up fully sporty - just like the zenith models that everyone loves.

The new model would make a great daily wearer, but I think I might like the current less versital model better.
I get what you are saying and agree it is much more sporty imo. But to me the black ceramic bezels have sort of a "bling" factor too in that they tend to reflect sunlight to the point it is hard to even read them (much like a fully polished bezel). I do like how they made the subdials easier to read but to me the new version is at least as much bling as the old one because the white/black contrast of the bezel and dial stands out more than the SS models.
sunspot2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 05:44 AM   #47
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by salvadorsantana View Post
I don't love ANY Daytona, they are pretty, but useless...
I disagree with useless.....


tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 05:59 AM   #48
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunspot2013 View Post
I get what you are saying and agree it is much more sporty imo. But to me the black ceramic bezels have sort of a "bling" factor too in that they tend to reflect sunlight to the point it is hard to even read them (much like a fully polished bezel). I do like how they made the subdials easier to read but to me the new version is at least as much bling as the old one because the white/black contrast of the bezel and dial stands out more than the SS models.
I'd have to see it in person, but I see your point. Ceramic does tend to be shiny.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 06:12 AM   #49
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Panda would have been special.

I like the new style as well and look forward to an opportunity to try it on.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 06:16 AM   #50
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by salvadorsantana View Post
I don't love ANY Daytona, they are pretty, but useless...
That is just silly


Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
I disagree with useless.....


X2.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 06:16 AM   #51
Roll the Lex
"TRF" Member
 
Roll the Lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
I typically prefer something with color- i.e. the RG daytona with the ceramic bezel. BUT... I'm going to have to reserve judgement until I see one in person. I'm going to have to go against the grain here and and say I prefer the black dial better though.
Roll the Lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 06:19 AM   #52
henry333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Hendricks
Location: USA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 826
Agree not much of NEW ...in the new SS ceramic Daytona. They just added a bezel then it's all"new" ....
henry333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 06:23 AM   #53
timtom33
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: The Office
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passionata View Post
I m sorry but it reminds me for a low end Seiko chrono ,ceramic works perfectly with the Platona but on these SS versions the contrast is just too strong for me.
At least one person shorter waiting list
This is a good point. It also looks very much like a Tag Chrono... I liked the non ceramic SS Daytona because it was the best looking "sporty dress watch" Rolex made IMO... Perfect if you didn't want to go the full sports/tool look of a sub or GMT etc.
timtom33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2016, 06:28 AM   #54
Bruin Watch
"TRF" Member
 
Bruin Watch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: LAX DFW
Watch: RolexOmegaCartier
Posts: 812
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
That is just silly

X2.

x3
Bruin Watch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.