To flip or keep the only modern Rolex in a collection?

[Charlie3755]

Originally Posted by lhanddds

I think this is the normal maturation process. Some folks never mature (he he). Seriously as people go from watch wearers to watch collectors, you come to appreciate the subtle nuances of vintage watches. Also, the search is so much more rewarding than walking into an AD and plunking down some cash. I currently have a polar Exp 2 42 which gets the least amount of wrist time. As nice as it is, I find it kinda boring. Welcome to enlightenment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

X 2

Following your steady aquisition of vintage watches (on IG), I did start to wonder when you might find yourself asking this question. Perhaps that BLNR will turn itself into a 5513?

[traf]

Maybe I'm the odd one out here, but I still have appreciation for the modern stuff independently of the vintage. I like each for different reasons, but I see room for both in a well rounded collection...

In your case, I'd say sell off the BLNR if you are disenchanted by it. You can readily buy another at any given time in the foreseeable future 👍


Sent from my  iPhone 6 using Tapatalk

[sishac]

From a Rolex standpoint, I have a 5512, 1680 and a 1675....I also own an Omega Speedmaster Professional and a vintage Seamaster 300.....when I wanted a watch that I could wear and really not be concerned about it, I bought a used Omega Seamaster Professional (blue Bond watch)...it is tough, it is low profile and I have zero issues wearing it in the water and "roughhousing" with it. I know that my other watches are all pretty tough watches, but I'd rather not "roughhouse" with them....but they are all daily drivers, so to speak...everyone goes in the rotation, and all but the 1675 live equal lives on a nato as well as their proper bracelets.

[traf]

Update on this?? 😇


Sent from my  iPhone 6 using Tapatalk

[Tom1675]

Originally Posted by eton97

I'm having exactly the same problem
I've got a Patek blue 5711 and a mk4 1665 DRSD.
Ever since buying the Drsd, the 5711 has been sat twirling around on the watch winder. I put it on last week to remind myself of why I own it and adore it......couldn't wait to get home from work and put on the red

Bought the 5711 as my 'forever' watch....not so sure anymore. Thinking of swapping it out for another vintage...although will that even get airtime over the double red?

Yeah the Patek 5711 is a specific look...

I think, and I don't know the 5711 very well but generally speaking, you could get a really nice example 6239 for that Patek or even a 6542 Bakelite (not an everyday wearer) or a perfect Blueberry GMT with some leftover... these could be a good replacement and have a different look than the double red...

Personally I am all in on Rolex so very biased advice to dump the Patek...

[JohnnyNoDate]

I went through the same cycle with a GMTc which I considered my "lifetime" watch at the time. I even bought from an AD...

I ended up selling it to cover costs for some vintage pieces. But at the end of the day, I came back to purchasing a SubC. I really needed a daily watch that was waterproof and could take a beating.

My idea is to keep a minimum modern collection (i.e.: 3 pieces) and grow the vintage collection over time.

[Netminder1]

I'm a 33/33/34 guy. My collection is a nice mix of vintage/neo-vintage/modern. Besides Rolex, I also collect IWCs. I love their tool watches including the nicest dress watch of all time the Jubilee Portuguese (IMHO). I will admit when I started collecting watches, I did miss the boat on Rolex. But I've been making up for it.

So all I can add to this discussion is: Think twice and then think again. While BNLRs are finding a market bottom, it is only a matter of time before they start to go up again. You can probably graph the cycle - introduction-->flippers-->collectors accumulate-->collectors/wearers get bored-->market bottoms--MSRP goes up-->secondary market goes up.

And of course, don't look back. You'll beat yourself up with regrets every time someone posts a beautiful pic of a watch you let go.

[speedolex]

Originally Posted by DCgator

Tomorrow is not guaranteed to be here.

Good point. We should all have at least one Rolex with good lume so that when the astroid hits and darkness falls upon the Earth we can at least still know what time it is.

[omitohud]

I collect vintage but keep a few semi modern for travel, so when the chance come for me to say save someone drowning, I don't have to take off my thin case mark III drsd first.


I blame it on the autoconnect.

[superstarmar]

Sorry you feel that way!
Love my BLNR !!! It's my daily and probably will be
for a long time... Had previous sub 16613 and liked the
original size . I wasn't sure if I'd like the larger new version case.
But now that I have it , I don't think I can go back !!! The vintage
and previous models wear kinda small .. It's a toss up ...

[Frogman4me]

I had this dilemma many many years ago. Let just say I don't own a modern Rolex and I have no regrets. Vintage watches all the way ;)

[mattedialdoc]

I just let my last modern go. My tastes changed as I learned more about the Rolex history, and the Vintage bug bit hard. I no longer find anything *special* in the 6 digit references. I think some of the 5 digit are OK.....but then why not go true vintage with matte and plexi! I purchase watches to wear....as watches...not as museum pieces. I find it interesting when folks show concern about hurting a tool watch. Wear and enjoy.
(....yeah, I need to change my screen name....again! 😬)

[dpa94114]

as I've bought more watches, my everlasting affection for 1802/3/7 has slipped a little to the ease that comes with 18038.

Getting the Day + Date right on the old DayDates can drive u crazy. especially February.

[Lordofrolex]

Personally i like to diversify my collection so a good mix is nice.

[cascarilla]

Thanks guys, I'm not crazy, I was beginning to think it was a rare animal

[L55HEM]

Definitely sounds like you are a vintage guy, I had a couple of vintage watches and some modern. Decided I preferred modern and then worried about selling the vintage ones, but ended up selling and personally didn't have any regrets, all down to personal taste. I would do what a couple of others have and trade it in and get another vintage for your collection.

[Boaters]

I love the vintage side of Rolex it is getting harder to get in with the prices rising as they are but they are beauties go with your heart and that sounds vintage to me.

[datejust24]

After owning all modern Rolex with the exception of a late '70's DJ I have sold all the modern for my one and only which is my 5512...it's hands down the most comfortable Rolex I've yet to own and don't plan on EVER letting it go ...get rid of the BLNR you won't regret it I promise

[bluemartinifan]

After years of flipping many vintage and modern watches of many brands, I am all vintage now for reasons already shared earlier in the thread. I don't need/want an $8,000 "beater" so my workout and swim watches are 70s and 80s Seiko divers.

[strafer_kid]

Been along this route myself. Have tried most of the modern Sport Rolex but have ended up moving them on because they just did not 'do it' for me - maybe they have moved too far in some aspects of their design from the earlier versions? Currently just have Sub 114060 and SD16600 that I would use as 'beaters' or in water, though I still rotate my vintage fairly regularly. No doubt there are pros and cons for both current and vintage - maybe the trick is to just mix both to the level makes you happy?

[trackpad]

Originally Posted by Tom1675

I was given a watch by my boss, he gave me a budget and took me to the rolex store and wanted me to find something.

I think everyone just wants to know more about your boss...or what it is you do. This is...not normal boss behaviour. Unless he is a mafia boss and then, well, could be fairly normal.

[Charlie3755]

Originally Posted by Frogman4me

I had this dilemma many many years ago. Let just say I don't own a modern Rolex and I have no regrets. Vintage watches all the way ;)

X 2


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[lhanddds]

Originally Posted by lhanddds

I think this is the normal maturation process. Some folks never mature (he he). Seriously as people go from watch wearers to watch collectors, you come to appreciate the subtle nuances of vintage watches. Also, the search is so much more rewarding than walking into an AD and plunking down some cash. I currently have a polar Exp 2 42 which gets the least amount of wrist time. As nice as it is, I find it kinda boring. Welcome to enlightenment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Update: ExpII Polar 42 gone. I haven't even bought anything to replace it. I'm in the minority but I was disappointed with the new ceramic/SS Daytona. It looks like Rolex just slapped a ceramic bezel on the old SS Daytona. We've been waiting a long time for this watch and it has no hint of vintage flavor. JMHO

[simongpaez]

If you are not feeling it anymore it might be time to let it go