ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

KeithP · 26 July 2016, 12:22 PM

216570 black dial. Killer, understated looks, all the functionality most would ever need. The perfect sport watch IMO.

The BLNR is certainly awesome too. I think you gotta just try them both on, and see which sings the loudest. Then walk away and sleep on it. Then see which one haunts your dreams. That's the one.

Can't go wrong with either.

Berserker74 · 26 July 2016, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bucknuts12

Have both, exp2 is a better casual watch and under the radar. Blnr is the best dress up watch ever, love both!

Best dress up watch ever? Bold call my friend, but what the heck live dangerously :D

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

DCheeta · 26 July 2016, 01:30 PM

Two totally different watches. The only thing they have in common is the GMT function. I've had them both, love them both...but ultimately the BLNR won out because the ExpII was just too big for my wrist.

anothernewphone · 26 July 2016, 01:35 PM

The Explorer II hasn't been "cool" since the 1655. It's just never been a big seller, and people around these parts definitely love the BLNR. The GMT (any color) is my vote.

DCheeta · 26 July 2016, 01:38 PM

Also want to add, to reinforce what Clive said, don't rule out the GMT LN version. That would also be a perfect only Rolex.

myc ritz · 26 July 2016, 01:43 PM

I wish the current Exp II was 40mm. The current black dial version is absolutely beautiful and stealthy, but just too big IMO. So...I vote BLNR, or consider a SD4K which I feel is the best modern Rolex.

gummy · 26 July 2016, 01:47 PM

Love both...

Comes down to if you like PCL or not...

AF_Rob · 26 July 2016, 02:21 PM

I'm in the Explorer II lot... The BLNR, along with the other similar models are chunky IMO... Though the ExII is 2mm larger, it is also flatter and sits better on my wrist. Plus the ExII is definitely it's own watch. The BLNR looks similar to other references.

Secretariat · 26 July 2016, 02:27 PM

I'd choose the BLNR over any SS Rolex watch.

brmeyers · 26 July 2016, 02:36 PM

I really like the BLNR between these two.
More modern, dressier yet sportier and the ceramic bezel is both more durable and beautiful IMO.
I owned a white EXP II and liked it, just didn't love it enough. It got flipped for a Black SubC which stuck a lot longer.
Have not owned a BLRN yet, but its been in my considerations the past year.

luvsub · 26 July 2016, 02:49 PM

Blnr

Berserker74 · 26 July 2016, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secretariat

I'd choose the BLNR over any SS Rolex watch.

Whaaaaaaat？Even the new Daytona C??? No no no no no :D

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Berserker74 · 26 July 2016, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gummy

Love both...

Comes down to if you like PCL or not...

I wouldn't say they were so similar that this world be true... JMO :D

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jrs146 · 26 July 2016, 09:09 PM

I'd suggest only using the opinions on here as a guide to pick up some tips, not as a recommendation for which to get. Choosing a watch is too personal of a choice - especially for your first.

I'd suggest going to your AD and trying both on. They wear quite different on the wrist. One will feel like the "right" one and tj you will have your choice!

Berserker74 · 26 July 2016, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCheeta

Also want to add, to reinforce what Clive said, don't rule out the GMT LN version. That would also be a perfect only Rolex.

Ooooooooooh "Perfect" really?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JRT · 26 July 2016, 09:26 PM

BLNR no brainer.

thefatboy · 26 July 2016, 09:43 PM

I had a very similar dilemma at the beginning of the year, but with the Polar Exp II. In the end I went for the BLNR as I'd coveted it for a long time and I unexpectedly came across one in an AD's window, they were slightly harder to find then in the UK.

One other factor to consider though is price, when I was looking the Exp II could be had on the Grey Market for almost half of what the BLNR was going for retail. That being the case, you could start a collection with an Exp II and perhaps an ETA Black Bay or something? If you're a one watch man though, I'd go for the BLNR, it's a great all-rounder.

You can't lose either way, they're both special pieces.

Good luck with your decision!

Ruud Van Driver · 26 July 2016, 09:54 PM

My immediate response was BLNR. However, without knowing about your lifestyle and dress style, it's a difficult call.

If the watch is going to be a one and only, then it needs a bit more consideration. If you're in a collar and tie for work, then BLNR. If you're in more casual wear, then the EXP II will work for you. The EXP won't dress up as well as the BLNR, but then if you're the sort of guy that dresses up once in blue moon then you could go EXP II and leave the watch home when the blue moon rises.

One thing I find annoying with the BLNR (and my Daytona) is how easily the PCLs scratch. A lot of members couldn't care less but it bugs me.

Good luck

ernie2 · 26 July 2016, 10:05 PM

I had a polar 42mm for a few years and flipped for a BLNR recently. Couldn't be more happier. The explorer was just a little too big for my 6.75" wrist. And during the flip, I came to realize the explorer did not retain value very well.

My explorer went with me to many places in the world and was at my wedding. It can be dress up and down. The white dial goes very well with black suits.

I would recommend BLNR if your wrists are not big.

Flywheel · 26 July 2016, 10:23 PM

I think many here prefer the Gmt because it represents the quintessential Rolex look, but in a vacuum the Exp II is a cleaner, purer design. The new Gmt is too boxy and the new bezel is too prominent. My only other concern would be 40 vs 42.

Castor · 26 July 2016, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dchen

I was in the same position as you on February!

I spent 6 months thinking about it and finally I July I went for the BLNR!

The explorer II is an interesting watch, but ultimately it lacks a certain lust factor that the BLNR seems to capture perfectly!

Put it this way, if you got the explorer II you'd always be thinking 'what if I got the BLNR'...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Never thought that... ever.

BBQ BOY · 27 July 2016, 12:26 AM

I own the polar Exp2(42mm) for the second time and I would choose the BLNR. I love my Exp2 and it is within a collection of Subs. I love the watch, but i find it slightly too large at times and I find that thee BLNR is the perfect all around watch.

Danny83 · 27 July 2016, 12:29 AM

Blnr

superstarmar · 27 July 2016, 02:02 AM

Wow , are you overwhelmed by now... Lol
I also vote BLNR as I have it and love it !!!
I looked at the Sub C Date LN, Sub C ND, GMT LN
GMT BLNR and YM Blue dial .... The one I picked ?
Obviously BLNR as I mentioned I own it !!!
Clearly the reasons why it won and best out the others .
Look , style , functionality , intrigue and timeless design...

Justice12 · 27 July 2016, 02:06 AM

I have a new SubC date and love it, but my next peice will be the polar EXP. 2, ultimate tool watch.

AlphaOmega4 · 27 July 2016, 03:35 AM

WOW!!

Thanks for all the amazing input and replies!

BLNR def gets the forum favor I see

I would quote you guys to answer but I feel like I'd have to hit everyone for all the helpful insight they have provided.

1. This will be my only watch for quite some time and first Rolex at that.

2. I usually dress up for work ( No Suit ) but Button down , creased slacks and dress shoes.. time to time I wear a tie .

Live at the beach so plenty of beach casual wear for the weekends but nighttime dinners and such I still dress nicer than beach casual.

I do have smaller wrist so that may play a hand and leaning towards the BLNR that and one of my closest buddies has a Explorer 2 and a Daytona.

Would be nice to wear something different also may come off pretty cheesy for two guys to be wearing the same watch.

I do personally love the look of the Explorer 2 but I must say I am being swayed towards the Batman.

Not to throw any curve balls as its mostly between the 2.. but I do love the Milgauss as well, however if I am only able to purchase one It would not be a top contender. The Daytona is my favorite especially love the new C.. but my wife and I have a formula that we stick to and that is to only purchase what we can pay for in full with the exception of a home.

Thanks again for all of your help..

I plan to stop by my local AD this weekend try both on and go from there.

I will probably be looking at the trusted sellers on this site as well who have a BLNR in excellent condition for sale.

Best,

John

masyv6 · 27 July 2016, 05:08 AM

Between those 2? BLNR.

amh · 27 July 2016, 05:47 AM

Rather different watches. I would have expected the choices would be like this:

- GMT BLNR vs LN
or
- GMT LN vs Exp II

The LN occupies a region between your original selections, it is not as eye catching as the BLNR nor is it as understated as the Exp II. The Exp II is one of the last remaining "tool watches" in the modern lineup.

In your case I would vote BLNR. You can always change your mind and unload it here with ease, then pick up the Exp II later. (I think LN is a better choice than either of those two for your first...)

Etschell · 27 July 2016, 05:49 AM

i dont think that is a fair fight. ask yourself this one BLNR or daytona or 116610lv. that's more on par.

fabio1965 · 27 July 2016, 05:58 AM

BLNR for me!

26 July 2016, 09:09 PM	#44
jrs146 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Josh Location: Lost in time Watch: Me Nae Nae Posts: 9,823	I'd suggest only using the opinions on here as a guide to pick up some tips, not as a recommendation for which to get. Choosing a watch is too personal of a choice - especially for your first. I'd suggest going to your AD and trying both on. They wear quite different on the wrist. One will feel like the "right" one and tj you will have your choice! __________________ "Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter

26 July 2016, 09:54 PM	#48
Ruud Van Driver "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chopped Liver Location: S. Wales Valleys Watch: Mickey Mouse Posts: 9,926	My immediate response was BLNR. However, without knowing about your lifestyle and dress style, it's a difficult call. If the watch is going to be a one and only, then it needs a bit more consideration. If you're in a collar and tie for work, then BLNR. If you're in more casual wear, then the EXP II will work for you. The EXP won't dress up as well as the BLNR, but then if you're the sort of guy that dresses up once in blue moon then you could go EXP II and leave the watch home when the blue moon rises. One thing I find annoying with the BLNR (and my Daytona) is how easily the PCLs scratch. A lot of members couldn't care less but it bugs me. Good luck __________________ 116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 *"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

27 July 2016, 05:49 AM	#59
Etschell "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: FL Watch: platinum sub Posts: 15,884	i dont think that is a fair fight. ask yourself this one BLNR or daytona or 116610lv. that's more on par. __________________ If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4.

26 July 2016, 12:22 PM	#31
KeithP "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Real Name: Keith Location: NYC Watch: AK 126900/SM 300M Posts: 1,664	216570 black dial. Killer, understated looks, all the functionality most would ever need. The perfect sport watch IMO. The BLNR is certainly awesome too. I think you gotta just try them both on, and see which sings the loudest. Then walk away and sleep on it. Then see which one haunts your dreams. That's the one. Can't go wrong with either.

26 July 2016, 01:30 PM	#33
DCheeta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Dave Location: NYC Posts: 7,181	Two totally different watches. The only thing they have in common is the GMT function. I've had them both, love them both...but ultimately the BLNR won out because the ExpII was just too big for my wrist.

26 July 2016, 01:35 PM	#34
anothernewphone Banned Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Bill Location: Plymouth Meeting Watch: 116520 Posts: 3,209	The Explorer II hasn't been "cool" since the 1655. It's just never been a big seller, and people around these parts definitely love the BLNR. The GMT (any color) is my vote.

26 July 2016, 01:38 PM	#35
DCheeta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Dave Location: NYC Posts: 7,181	Also want to add, to reinforce what Clive said, don't rule out the GMT LN version. That would also be a perfect only Rolex.

26 July 2016, 01:43 PM	#36
myc ritz 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: USA Watch: AP, Speedy, Rolex Posts: 976	I wish the current Exp II was 40mm. The current black dial version is absolutely beautiful and stealthy, but just too big IMO. So...I vote BLNR, or consider a SD4K which I feel is the best modern Rolex.

26 July 2016, 01:47 PM	#37
gummy 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Thomas Location: Midwest USA Watch: AP PP Rolex Posts: 3,348	Love both... Comes down to if you like PCL or not...

26 July 2016, 02:21 PM	#38
AF_Rob "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Rob Location: Virginia Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB Posts: 4,673	I'm in the Explorer II lot... The BLNR, along with the other similar models are chunky IMO... Though the ExII is 2mm larger, it is also flatter and sits better on my wrist. Plus the ExII is definitely it's own watch. The BLNR looks similar to other references.

26 July 2016, 02:27 PM	#39
Secretariat "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Michael Location: Philippines Posts: 1,730	I'd choose the BLNR over any SS Rolex watch.

26 July 2016, 02:36 PM	#40
brmeyers "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Bryant Location: Florida Watch: ...Your Thoughts Posts: 2,171	I really like the BLNR between these two. More modern, dressier yet sportier and the ceramic bezel is both more durable and beautiful IMO. I owned a white EXP II and liked it, just didn't love it enough. It got flipped for a Black SubC which stuck a lot longer. Have not owned a BLRN yet, but its been in my considerations the past year.

26 July 2016, 02:49 PM	#41
luvsub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SF, south bay Posts: 5,222	Blnr

26 July 2016, 09:26 PM	#46
JRT "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Taiwan Watch: Rolex BLNR Posts: 2,308	BLNR no brainer.

26 July 2016, 09:43 PM	#47
thefatboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: UK Watch: BLNR Posts: 101	I had a very similar dilemma at the beginning of the year, but with the Polar Exp II. In the end I went for the BLNR as I'd coveted it for a long time and I unexpectedly came across one in an AD's window, they were slightly harder to find then in the UK. One other factor to consider though is price, when I was looking the Exp II could be had on the Grey Market for almost half of what the BLNR was going for retail. That being the case, you could start a collection with an Exp II and perhaps an ETA Black Bay or something? If you're a one watch man though, I'd go for the BLNR, it's a great all-rounder. You can't lose either way, they're both special pieces. Good luck with your decision!

26 July 2016, 10:05 PM	#49
ernie2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Arnold Location: New York Watch: SD4K+BLNR Posts: 849	I had a polar 42mm for a few years and flipped for a BLNR recently. Couldn't be more happier. The explorer was just a little too big for my 6.75" wrist. And during the flip, I came to realize the explorer did not retain value very well. My explorer went with me to many places in the world and was at my wedding. It can be dress up and down. The white dial goes very well with black suits. I would recommend BLNR if your wrists are not big.

26 July 2016, 10:23 PM	#50
Flywheel "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Cleveland Posts: 628	I think many here prefer the Gmt because it represents the quintessential Rolex look, but in a vacuum the Exp II is a cleaner, purer design. The new Gmt is too boxy and the new bezel is too prominent. My only other concern would be 40 vs 42.

27 July 2016, 12:26 AM	#52
BBQ BOY "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: South Carolina Posts: 513	I own the polar Exp2(42mm) for the second time and I would choose the BLNR. I love my Exp2 and it is within a collection of Subs. I love the watch, but i find it slightly too large at times and I find that thee BLNR is the perfect all around watch.

27 July 2016, 12:29 AM	#53
Danny83 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Real Name: Danny Location: Bay Area CA Watch: Yellow Gold Posts: 20,312	Blnr

27 July 2016, 02:02 AM	#54
superstarmar Banned Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: In Motion Watch: my wrist presence Posts: 7,436	Wow , are you overwhelmed by now... Lol I also vote BLNR as I have it and love it !!! I looked at the Sub C Date LN, Sub C ND, GMT LN GMT BLNR and YM Blue dial .... The one I picked ? Obviously BLNR as I mentioned I own it !!! Clearly the reasons why it won and best out the others . Look , style , functionality , intrigue and timeless design...

27 July 2016, 02:06 AM	#55
Justice12 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Delaware Posts: 96	I have a new SubC date and love it, but my next peice will be the polar EXP. 2, ultimate tool watch.

27 July 2016, 03:35 AM	#56
AlphaOmega4 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Real Name: J Location: @ the Beach Watch: AK 116900 Posts: 170	WOW!! Thanks for all the amazing input and replies! BLNR def gets the forum favor I see I would quote you guys to answer but I feel like I'd have to hit everyone for all the helpful insight they have provided. 1. This will be my only watch for quite some time and first Rolex at that. 2. I usually dress up for work ( No Suit ) but Button down , creased slacks and dress shoes.. time to time I wear a tie . Live at the beach so plenty of beach casual wear for the weekends but nighttime dinners and such I still dress nicer than beach casual. I do have smaller wrist so that may play a hand and leaning towards the BLNR that and one of my closest buddies has a Explorer 2 and a Daytona. Would be nice to wear something different also may come off pretty cheesy for two guys to be wearing the same watch. I do personally love the look of the Explorer 2 but I must say I am being swayed towards the Batman. Not to throw any curve balls as its mostly between the 2.. but I do love the Milgauss as well, however if I am only able to purchase one It would not be a top contender. The Daytona is my favorite especially love the new C.. but my wife and I have a formula that we stick to and that is to only purchase what we can pay for in full with the exception of a home. Thanks again for all of your help.. I plan to stop by my local AD this weekend try both on and go from there. I will probably be looking at the trusted sellers on this site as well who have a BLNR in excellent condition for sale. Best, John

27 July 2016, 05:08 AM	#57
masyv6 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: 35000ft Posts: 3,771	Between those 2? BLNR.

27 July 2016, 05:47 AM	#58
amh "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Tejas Watch: Various Posts: 5,082	Rather different watches. I would have expected the choices would be like this: - GMT BLNR vs LN or - GMT LN vs Exp II The LN occupies a region between your original selections, it is not as eye catching as the BLNR nor is it as understated as the Exp II. The Exp II is one of the last remaining "tool watches" in the modern lineup. In your case I would vote BLNR. You can always change your mind and unload it here with ease, then pick up the Exp II later. (I think LN is a better choice than either of those two for your first...)

27 July 2016, 05:58 AM	#60
fabio1965 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Milano Posts: 120	BLNR for me!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)