ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rcd213 · 14 August 2016, 02:05 AM

Hi everyone, just recently acquired this explorer II. I was hoping I could get some opinions on the size, specifically casually as shown in the pic. My wife commented it looks a bit small, and I'm thinking that maybe I should've gone with the 42 mm version, even though I like the dial of the 16570 a bit more, at least from photos. My wrist is around 7 inches, but fairly flat.

Thanks in advance for your opinions.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

14 August 2016, 02:05 AM	#1
Rcd213 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: NYC Posts: 20	16570 looks small? Hi everyone, just recently acquired this explorer II. I was hoping I could get some opinions on the size, specifically casually as shown in the pic. My wife commented it looks a bit small, and I'm thinking that maybe I should've gone with the 42 mm version, even though I like the dial of the 16570 a bit more, at least from photos. My wrist is around 7 inches, but fairly flat. Thanks in advance for your opinions. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)