ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Watch Rob · 3 September 2016, 12:38 AM

go Millie!

sea-dweller · 3 September 2016, 12:40 AM

I'd look at the Explorer.

Techno · 3 September 2016, 12:52 AM

114060 on my tiny wrist

watchwatcher · 3 September 2016, 12:53 AM

Well, if you find the sub too big, then I would go EXP. The milguass is the same 40mm as the sub, and might even be thicker, due to its faraday cage.

The Libertine · 3 September 2016, 01:48 AM

Explorer; just can't get past the second hand on the Milgauss.... not my thing.

Peter99 · 3 September 2016, 02:26 AM

Explorer! A watch for all occasions!
Wear it up the mountains or black tie dinners it just fits in!

jmolsberg · 3 September 2016, 02:29 AM

it's big but it still looks beautiful!
I think the 39mm explorer may also look large because your wrist is small.
Maybe consider a 36mm explorer or DJ

Yousefsl · 3 September 2016, 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Techno

Guys.
I find 114060 too big for a small man like me n exploring smaller Rolex sport watch

A 114060 measure 13mm thick n 47mm lug to lug.

So what are milgauss n explorer 1 dimension ?

I own a Milgauss it has a really lovely unique look with the green glass and orange lighting bolt second hand, the only problem I face with it is that it is heavy and can feel a bit annoying at times.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

Speed · 3 September 2016, 05:17 AM

I love the weight of the Milgauss. I have a 6.5" wrist...and the watch feels great!

hbk25 · 3 September 2016, 05:34 AM

Yeah, a little tall. It catches on shirt cuffs. It's a tad heavier, definitely let's you know it's there.

Yousefsl · 3 September 2016, 05:42 AM

[QUOTE=hbk25;6977017]Yeah, a little tall. It catches on shirt cuffs. It's a tad heavier, definitely let's you know it's there.

Do you have a picture of your Milgauss on that green Nato? I haven't tried mine on a Nato yet.

hbk25 · 3 September 2016, 06:06 AM

[QUOTE=Yousefsl;6977047]

Quote:

Originally Posted by hbk25

Yeah, a little tall. It catches on shirt cuffs. It's a tad heavier, definitely let's you know it's there.

Do you have a picture of your Milgauss on that green Nato? I haven't tried mine on a Nato yet.

It's actually one of those perlon straps.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

alexxelor · 3 September 2016, 06:47 AM

milgauss black dial out production , only 5 years , vintage line like 1019 . what do you think about ?

[IMG]

[/IMG]

Yousefsl · 3 September 2016, 07:15 AM

It's actually one of those perlon straps.

Thank you, that Looks great, I have to try they, does it feel too top heavy with the perlon strap?

hbk25 · 3 September 2016, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yousefsl

It's actually one of those perlon straps.

Thank you, that Looks great, I have to try they, does it feel too top heavy with the perlon strap?

No, but I know what you mean. This one feels heavy / unbalanced on the perlons.

TickTockChuck · 3 September 2016, 10:22 AM

The 2016 Explorer I (39mm) just makes it around my 7.25" wrist (no lugs removed) with the 5mm easylink extension just right for those days when my wrist expands. You will have to try them on to be sure. Good Luck! Cheers!

Techno · 3 September 2016, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmolsberg

it's big but it still looks beautiful!
I think the 39mm explorer may also look large because your wrist is small.
Maybe consider a 36mm explorer or DJ

Wearing a Rolex sport And ought to feel Manly :)

Scapegoat · 3 September 2016, 12:33 PM

Ex39 FTW!

solo-act · 3 September 2016, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ranxoren

I vote Explorer 1. It's a gorgeous piece and has perfect proportions at 36mm.
Even the 39mm looks great if you want slightly larger.

Agreed

Verdi · 3 September 2016, 02:06 PM

I'd go for the Explorer because it is comfier to wear and it is a good all around Rolex.

doramas · 3 September 2016, 03:45 PM

114270 36mm

nachopc · 3 September 2016, 06:33 PM

Get both!

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Anthon · 3 September 2016, 08:13 PM

I own both the SubC and the 39mm Exp.
Explorer is more comfortable, but definitely looks bigger on the wrist! The lack of a bezel masks the fact that it is the smaller watch of the two. The SubC definitely looks and feels thicker though.

It took me a long time to warm up to the SubC. I still hate the cyclops, but I'm now used to ignoring it.

3 September 2016, 12:40 AM	#32
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I'd look at the Explorer. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

3 September 2016, 06:47 AM	#43
alexxelor Banned Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: alessandro Location: ROMA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 675	milgauss black dial out production , only 5 years , vintage line like 1019 . what do you think about ? [IMG][/IMG]

3 September 2016, 02:06 PM	#50
Verdi "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mitch Location: UAE Watch: Big Ben Posts: 2,451	I'd go for the Explorer because it is comfier to wear and it is a good all around Rolex. __________________ IG: @watch_idiot_savant

3 September 2016, 12:38 AM	#31
Watch Rob "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: Chicago Watch: 114200 Posts: 1,265	go Millie!

3 September 2016, 12:52 AM	#33
Techno "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Small city Posts: 181	114060 on my tiny wrist

3 September 2016, 12:53 AM	#34
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,047	Well, if you find the sub too big, then I would go EXP. The milguass is the same 40mm as the sub, and might even be thicker, due to its faraday cage.

3 September 2016, 01:48 AM	#35
The Libertine Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Mike Location: BOS Watch: 16710;14060;214270 Posts: 6,375	Explorer; just can't get past the second hand on the Milgauss.... not my thing.

3 September 2016, 02:26 AM	#36
Peter99 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: London Watch: 116610LN & 214270 Posts: 493	Explorer! A watch for all occasions! Wear it up the mountains or black tie dinners it just fits in!

3 September 2016, 02:29 AM	#37
jmolsberg "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Jan-Michael Location: Fort Worth Watch: ROLEX Posts: 423	it's big but it still looks beautiful! I think the 39mm explorer may also look large because your wrist is small. Maybe consider a 36mm explorer or DJ

3 September 2016, 05:17 AM	#39
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	I love the weight of the Milgauss. I have a 6.5" wrist...and the watch feels great!

3 September 2016, 05:34 AM	#40
hbk25 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Real Name: Eric Location: US Watch: Z Blue Posts: 178	Yeah, a little tall. It catches on shirt cuffs. It's a tad heavier, definitely let's you know it's there.

3 September 2016, 05:42 AM	#41
Yousefsl "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: UK Posts: 300	[QUOTE=hbk25;6977017]Yeah, a little tall. It catches on shirt cuffs. It's a tad heavier, definitely let's you know it's there. Do you have a picture of your Milgauss on that green Nato? I haven't tried mine on a Nato yet.

3 September 2016, 07:15 AM	#44
Yousefsl "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: UK Posts: 300	It's actually one of those perlon straps. Thank you, that Looks great, I have to try they, does it feel too top heavy with the perlon strap?

3 September 2016, 10:22 AM	#46
TickTockChuck "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Real Name: Chuck Location: Canada Watch: Rolex 116610LV Posts: 2,270	The 2016 Explorer I (39mm) just makes it around my 7.25" wrist (no lugs removed) with the 5mm easylink extension just right for those days when my wrist expands. You will have to try them on to be sure. Good Luck! Cheers!

3 September 2016, 12:33 PM	#48
Scapegoat "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Lee Location: South East Asia Watch: Tudor Pro Posts: 1,798	Ex39 FTW!

3 September 2016, 03:45 PM	#51
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	114270 36mm

3 September 2016, 06:33 PM	#52
nachopc 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Real Name: Nash Location: Europe Watch: Rolex Only Posts: 1,579	Get both! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

3 September 2016, 08:13 PM	#53
Anthon "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: The Netherlands Watch: Explorer Posts: 545	I own both the SubC and the 39mm Exp. Explorer is more comfortable, but definitely looks bigger on the wrist! The lack of a bezel masks the fact that it is the smaller watch of the two. The SubC definitely looks and feels thicker though. It took me a long time to warm up to the SubC. I still hate the cyclops, but I'm now used to ignoring it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)