ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Is the 216570 too big for my 6.75" wrist? | |||
Too Big - Buy Something Else | 54 | 24.66% | |
Go For It - Buy the 216570 | 165 | 75.34% | |
Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
24 November 2016, 12:19 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Jason
Location: MS
Watch: Rolex, Tudor
Posts: 1,315
|
Looks good to me
|
24 November 2016, 12:25 PM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,509
|
Looks fine
|
24 November 2016, 12:28 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Charlotte/London
Watch: Multiple
Posts: 889
|
Too big playboi
__________________
♕ Daytona - 116506 ♕ GMT-Master II - 116710BLNR ♕ Yacht-Master II - 116680 ♕ Daytona - 116520 ♕ Explorer II - 16570 |
24 November 2016, 02:41 PM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: 1665,1675,1680,SD4
Posts: 1,837
|
The dial looks big in relation to your wrist, especially in the second picture.
Sent from my Galaxy S6 using Tapatalk |
24 November 2016, 02:48 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Seattle
Watch: Red Sub 1680
Posts: 345
|
Totally fine! Not even close to being too big. Go for it.
|
24 November 2016, 03:22 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 46
|
|
24 November 2016, 03:38 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 116400G,216570,
Posts: 192
|
I looks good.
Go with your instinct, you already know the answer. Don't fight it. |
24 November 2016, 03:43 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: KY
Watch: A few.....
Posts: 3,796
|
Looks fine but I say the same thing and my wrist is an inch or more larger.....
|
24 November 2016, 05:19 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,483
|
Looks absolutely fine to me. I have the same watch and similar sized wrists. Lovely watch. Wear it and be happy.
|
24 November 2016, 05:47 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: South Africa
Posts: 873
|
The torso shot is the telling one. My first post on the RF is to tell you it looks great
|
24 November 2016, 07:04 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Auckland
Watch: BLNR, Exp II, SubC
Posts: 155
|
I've got smaller wrist and exp 2 fits fine. The key thing is if you wear this with formal wear like shirt / tie it will appear too big and get in the way of your sleeve...etc
Absolutely no problem if you dress casually ! |
24 November 2016, 09:33 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Looks great
__________________
|
24 November 2016, 10:01 PM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
|
I think it fits. Ask the AD to size the watch for you as you would wear it. Then you will see. On the DSSD and the Explorer II and any of the larger mm watches you can not get a true feel for the size if the watch is not properly adjusted. Once sized you will see that it works. I own the Polar Explorer II and think that it is a great watch. I will say that the Sub, Daytona and many more of the watches could use the 42 mm platform and be very successful. Short of all of the complaining on TRF. Go for it.
|
24 November 2016, 10:07 PM | #44 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,106
|
We men are always obsessed with size
Looks great IMO. Rolex wears smaller than most other brands. |
24 November 2016, 10:38 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Noah
Location: Ulster
Posts: 391
|
As has been stated, its ok if the watch covers most of your wrist as long as the lugs don't overhang.
|
24 November 2016, 11:02 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
Looks great actually!!
|
26 November 2016, 03:06 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,673
|
I think it looks fine, especially in the black. To me it wears smaller than the Sub and GMT with the better lug taper to the bracelet. Also, it is proportioned very well.
|
26 November 2016, 03:09 AM | #48 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,694
|
Looks perfect imho.
|
26 November 2016, 04:00 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, NY
Posts: 1,089
|
When in doubt, use the mirror test. Photos tend to make the watch appear bigger and holding it near your face dies the same thing. Stand a few feet from a mirror and see how the watch appears to others. I think you'll find it looks just fine!
|
26 November 2016, 04:11 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,575
|
EXP II 42mm - Too Big On My Wrist?
I had same dilemma. I have 6.75 wrist too. The size gave me pause. I think it fits but then.....not sure
However looking at the picture below it seems perfect!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 November 2016, 04:16 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: 114060
Posts: 425
|
Does it look good, yes. Although a slightly smaller watch would look even better. So I say yes the watch is a little too big. As you are aware cause you are asking.
|
26 November 2016, 04:44 AM | #52 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
|
I typically think yes. Too big. If someone is askin, usually there is a reason.
In this case, nope. I think it looks great.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
26 November 2016, 07:12 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
|
I've got a similar sized wrist. Tried the 42 mm exp 2 and it was totally fine. To the point that it's on my list.
Looks great on you. But it's what you feel that matters
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
26 November 2016, 07:15 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
Looks great on you. Go for it.
|
26 November 2016, 07:39 AM | #55 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,542
|
Haha..... "almost always right", according to who?
|
26 November 2016, 07:42 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
|
26 November 2016, 07:44 AM | #57 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,542
|
|
26 November 2016, 07:45 AM | #58 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Utopia
Posts: 2,101
|
Quote:
|
|
26 November 2016, 08:18 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Mt. Vernon, KY
Posts: 61
|
I purchased mine about a month ago. My wrist is a 7".
|
26 November 2016, 08:20 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHILA
Posts: 1,726
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.