ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Waterproofpt · 29 March 2017, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick P

Chaps

I spoke to my local AD this morning and asked the question - is it sticks or batons.

The answer was unequivocal - it is batons.

So please no more use of the term sticks. It is horrible.

Nothing to stop you asking your own AD either.

Regards

Mick

To each his own I guess. Not sure about telling all the people on the forum listing Rolexes with 'stick' dials they're wrong though.

Kinda like deployant and deployment .... but not really.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

AboutTime · 29 March 2017, 04:48 AM

Romans all the way for me!

dr35mm · 29 March 2017, 04:57 AM

Sticks, less is more and IMO Romans belong on DDs.

teb1013 · 29 March 2017, 05:03 AM

Mine is batons/sticks Roman just doesn't do it for me. According to the Rolex site, the DJ 36 with sticks/batons and with Roman list the same amount so I assume that the difference in price has to do with the dealer's having more difficulty in selling the Roman. I assume that you want a new watch, you can probably get an excellent used Datejust for a good deal less in the appearance that you want (I did this, but you may not want to). Good luck, let us know what you choose.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

GMT Aviator · 29 March 2017, 05:05 AM

If it's a DJ2, then batons for sure....

longimanus88 · 29 March 2017, 05:06 AM

I tend to prefer sportier watches, but I'd go with the Romans on this one. Listen to your heart, not to what we advise you! Good luck!

Flywheel · 29 March 2017, 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick P

Chaps

I believe the correct word is batons, not sticks, but without doubt, both Roman and Arabic numerals do look fussy on a watch.

Batons any day.

Regards

Mick

Sticks.

lord91 · 29 March 2017, 05:39 AM

Batons all the way, and still get small, nicer roman numerals. Also neat for going 36 mm.

SemperFi · 29 March 2017, 05:56 AM

Tough choice and really can't go wrong either way. Personally, for me, batons.
Good luck with your decision.

Old Geezer · 29 March 2017, 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jb335

sticks all day.....no doubt. On this watch its just more aesthetically pleasing. Streamlined. Clean.

Sticks.

x2

Maiden · 29 March 2017, 06:03 AM

sticks for me

JR16 · 29 March 2017, 06:04 AM

Batons... you get the romans along the track ... win win

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

AK797 · 29 March 2017, 06:04 AM

Do you mean the price difference is because of a deal you can find or because the fluted bezel is WG and so costs more than the smooth bezel? I would prefer sticks on a blue dial.

jazznpool · 29 March 2017, 06:07 AM

Sticks are more classic and appealing to me. Nothing wrong with the Roman dial though. Good luck with your purchase!

lecorsaire · 29 March 2017, 07:38 AM

Romans and save the 1000 quid for something else. Just my two cents. I think you can't go wrong with either one to be honest.

Benjamin Choi · 29 March 2017, 07:39 AM

Sticks all day

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jb335 · 29 March 2017, 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick P

Chaps

I spoke to my local AD this morning and asked the question - is it sticks or batons.

The answer was unequivocal - it is batons.

So please no more use of the term sticks. It is horrible.

Nothing to stop you asking your own AD either.

Regards

Mick

LOL, as if ADs know anything.

It was just this month a very large AD told me there is no difference between a DJ II and a DJ 41 other than one is only available in TT.

They don't know.

watchwatcher · 29 March 2017, 07:45 AM

Love the stick dial...but convention WIS-dom says Romans look best with fluted/jubilee combo.

lecorsaire · 29 March 2017, 07:48 AM

Batons is technically the correct term. Just like it's dial instead of face and bracelet instead of band. I can't stand when people call it the face or band. Especially band when referring to a metal bracelet.

farscott · 29 March 2017, 08:55 AM

My preference would be for the batons as I find either Roman or Arabic numerals at the indices to be unnecessary clutter.

I really prefer the dials from the 1960s and 1970s with the thinner batons and subdivided minutes.

Iloreyix · 29 March 2017, 08:59 AM

Batons are a touch more timeless. Batons for me for sure.

AJM914 · 29 March 2017, 08:59 AM

Tough choice, i have a 36mm with the romans and it looks very classy......at the same time theres nothing wrong with the batons. Guess you got some thinking to do

Boothroyd · 29 March 2017, 09:34 AM

I favor the batons. Note that on this model, the baton dial also sports romans (although very small). I have always liked that detail.

tomchicago · 29 March 2017, 09:34 AM

Romans!

Nyc27000 · 29 March 2017, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jb335

LOL, as if ADs know anything.

It was just this month a very large AD told me there is no difference between a DJ II and a DJ 41 other than one is only available in TT.

They don't know.

I walked into the 5th Ave Rolex Boutique on the day of the Basel release asking to try on DJ41 PM to see the fit, they kept on saying "you mean the DJ II? Because the DJ41 was just announced today." I finally relented and said yeah, the DJII. Hahaha.

Flywheel · 29 March 2017, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick P

Please no more use of the term sticks.

Really?

Quailhunter · 29 March 2017, 10:28 AM

I have the baton dial and prefer its simple elegance. The price difference is very odd.

ernie2 · 29 March 2017, 12:08 PM

roman

Eric Chan · 29 March 2017, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lewisp123

As per title - datejust 36 blue dial with sticks or Roman numerals?

So essentially, this is my first Rolex and as such this would be a watch that I would hopefully have for the long term! It would be my daily wearer ( I work in a suit everyday) but also would like to wear with jeans and casual clothes too. I'm not too bothered about lume really!

Have attached some pictures and I've been in the shops and tried them both on but I can't decide!

Also if I get the Romans then I can it for £4900, whereas sticks would be for £5900!

Thanks in advance!

Roman dial for me. Datejust with Jubilee bracelet, flutes bezel and a Roman dial is classic iconic Rolex. Love it.

If you are going blue dial, perhaps you should consider a blue Jubilee Roman dial. That is one hell of a combination.

gabrielc · 29 March 2017, 01:54 PM

this more clean

29 March 2017, 04:57 AM	#33
dr35mm "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Real Name: Peter Location: Caribbean Watch: BB58 Posts: 2,398	Sticks, less is more and IMO Romans belong on DDs. __________________ Present: BB58 \| BB36 \| GMW-B5000D-1JF \| 6900-PT80 Past: 16610LN \| 16622 \| 116610LN \| 214270

29 March 2017, 05:05 AM	#35
GMT Aviator 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: London Posts: 3,318	If it's a DJ2, then batons for sure.... Attached Images

29 March 2017, 05:39 AM	#38
lord91 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Bucuresti Watch: a Rolex duo Posts: 1,992	Batons all the way, and still get small, nicer roman numerals. Also neat for going 36 mm. Last edited by lord91; 29 March 2017 at 05:43 AM.. Reason: forgot to mention something

29 March 2017, 05:56 AM	#39
SemperFi "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Real Name: Angelo Location: Brooklyn, NY Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 42,164	Tough choice and really can't go wrong either way. Personally, for me, batons. Good luck with your decision. __________________ Rolex Submariner Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue Tudor Ranger 79910 Nomos Club Datum 733 Nomos Metro 38 Stowa Flieger Classic 40 * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *

29 March 2017, 06:03 AM	#41
Maiden "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 3,652	sticks for me __________________ Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2

29 March 2017, 04:48 AM	#32
AboutTime "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: N California Posts: 909	Romans all the way for me!

29 March 2017, 05:03 AM	#34
teb1013 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: Easton PA Posts: 581	Mine is batons/sticks Roman just doesn't do it for me. According to the Rolex site, the DJ 36 with sticks/batons and with Roman list the same amount so I assume that the difference in price has to do with the dealer's having more difficulty in selling the Roman. I assume that you want a new watch, you can probably get an excellent used Datejust for a good deal less in the appearance that you want (I did this, but you may not want to). Good luck, let us know what you choose. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

29 March 2017, 05:06 AM	#36
longimanus88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: Brussels Posts: 154	I tend to prefer sportier watches, but I'd go with the Romans on this one. Listen to your heart, not to what we advise you! Good luck!

29 March 2017, 06:04 AM	#42
JR16 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: USA Posts: 6,253	Batons... you get the romans along the track ... win win Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

29 March 2017, 06:04 AM	#43
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	Do you mean the price difference is because of a deal you can find or because the fluted bezel is WG and so costs more than the smooth bezel? I would prefer sticks on a blue dial.

29 March 2017, 06:07 AM	#44
jazznpool "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Location: Orange, CA Posts: 240	Sticks are more classic and appealing to me. Nothing wrong with the Roman dial though. Good luck with your purchase!

29 March 2017, 07:38 AM	#45
lecorsaire "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: NYC Watch: 116710BLNR Posts: 1,541	Romans and save the 1000 quid for something else. Just my two cents. I think you can't go wrong with either one to be honest. __________________ Rolex 116710 BLNR Rolex Day Date 118238 Champagne/Batons

29 March 2017, 07:39 AM	#46
Benjamin Choi "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 237	Sticks all day Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

29 March 2017, 07:45 AM	#48
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,047	Love the stick dial...but convention WIS-dom says Romans look best with fluted/jubilee combo.

29 March 2017, 07:48 AM	#49
lecorsaire "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: NYC Watch: 116710BLNR Posts: 1,541	Batons is technically the correct term. Just like it's dial instead of face and bracelet instead of band. I can't stand when people call it the face or band. Especially band when referring to a metal bracelet. __________________ Rolex 116710 BLNR Rolex Day Date 118238 Champagne/Batons

29 March 2017, 08:55 AM	#50
farscott "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Scott Location: Dunedin, FL, USA Posts: 134	My preference would be for the batons as I find either Roman or Arabic numerals at the indices to be unnecessary clutter. I really prefer the dials from the 1960s and 1970s with the thinner batons and subdivided minutes.

29 March 2017, 08:59 AM	#51
Iloreyix "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: 114060 Sub-C Posts: 513	Batons are a touch more timeless. Batons for me for sure.

29 March 2017, 08:59 AM	#52
AJM914 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Real Name: AJ Location: NY Watch: ♕ Posts: 6,761	Tough choice, i have a 36mm with the romans and it looks very classy......at the same time theres nothing wrong with the batons. Guess you got some thinking to do __________________

29 March 2017, 09:34 AM	#53
Boothroyd 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Daniel Location: Minneapolis, MN Watch: Wilsdorf(s) Posts: 10,258	I favor the batons. Note that on this model, the baton dial also sports romans (although very small). I have always liked that detail. __________________ Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N

29 March 2017, 09:34 AM	#54
tomchicago Banned Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Chicago Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270. Posts: 2,717	Romans!

29 March 2017, 10:28 AM	#57
Quailhunter "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Real Name: Doug Location: Georgia USA Watch: Rolex President Posts: 1,348	I have the baton dial and prefer its simple elegance. The price difference is very odd.

29 March 2017, 12:08 PM	#58
ernie2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Arnold Location: New York Watch: SD4K+BLNR Posts: 849	roman

29 March 2017, 01:54 PM	#60
gabrielc "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Rep. Dom. Watch: Sub,Dj4,dd,daytona Posts: 185	this more clean Attached Images

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)