ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

hishorology · 23 April 2017, 01:52 PM

I much prefer the 5 digit references.

B737 · 23 April 2017, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zakattack62

It's crazy but all i had were 6 digit watches, sub, BLNR, Datejust, Deepsea Blue and on and on. I thought I would try the 16610 sub. Man it feels and looks great on the wrist. The bracelet and clasp superiority is a non issue for me. It's all about wrist comfort and looks. Got rid of my six digit watches and I'm getting my 16600 sea dweller this Monday.

For me it is perfect and I have been thriugh the same journey as you.

Alexwwjd · 23 April 2017, 04:45 PM

The less digits the better.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

strafer_kid · 23 April 2017, 06:22 PM

Happens all the time.....we are spoilt with a great choice of watches! Just go for the one you want!

Loevhagen · 23 April 2017, 07:19 PM

Had the 116613LB. Sold it and got the 16618LB
Had the 116710BLNR. Sold it for a 16710 and three inserts instead.
Had the 216570. Sold it. Use my wife's 16570 instead sometimes.
Had the ...

The 5-digit versions are perfection. :)

emersm · 23 April 2017, 10:20 PM

No, your not crazy.

landroverking · 23 April 2017, 10:26 PM

No IMHO you will have a better watch.

Maiden · 24 April 2017, 02:50 AM

If thats what you want, why not.

AzHadEnuf · 24 April 2017, 05:01 AM

I've tried to buy a 116610 at least 3 times. I know it's a better movement, bracelet, clasp and bezel. I just wish it looked like this.

Name: IMG_3587.jpg
Views: 236
Size: 76.6 KB

Name: IMG_3587.jpg
Views: 236
Size: 76.6 KB

But I prefer 6 speed manual transmissions to modern dual clutch transmissions. Go figure.

IT Nerd · 24 April 2017, 05:23 AM

Either are fine, both are better though!

HL65 · 24 April 2017, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loevhagen

Had the 116613LB. Sold it and got the 16618LB
Had the 116710BLNR. Sold it for a 16710 and three inserts instead.
Had the 216570. Sold it. Use my wife's 16570 instead sometimes.
Had the ...

The 5-digit versions are perfection. :)

jezza17 · 27 April 2017, 08:54 PM

Go for it. I have gone 6 digit then back to 5 many times now. Even though there are some improvements with the new watches, they can't get the aesthetics quite right. The oversized super case are actually quite hideous to me. That's just me.

brandrea · 27 April 2017, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loevhagen

Had the 116613LB. Sold it and got the 16618LB
Had the 116710BLNR. Sold it for a 16710 and three inserts instead.
Had the 216570. Sold it. Use my wife's 16570 instead sometimes.
Had the ...

The 5-digit versions are perfection. :)

Bravo

jezza17 · 18 January 2018, 08:40 PM

I have gone 6 digit sub and GMT a few times and everytime I have gone back to the 5 digit. In my opinion, the super size case and hideous crown guards are nauseating. 4 or 5 digit for me any day.

regaltrojan · 20 December 2018, 11:24 AM

I'm thinking of flipping my 116710 for a 16610 now. I'm tired of the PCLs on the 116710 getting easily scratched. Any thoughts out there?

pigman08 · 20 December 2018, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by regaltrojan

I'm thinking of flipping my 116710 for a 16610 now. I'm tired of the PCLs on the 116710 getting easily scratched. Any thoughts out there?

Do it... A 16610 was my first Rolex in 1999, and it’s a keeper. I haven’t owned one, but I’ve worn a couple of 6 digit GMT’s, and the aesthetics just don’t do it for me. While I really like the feel of the newer bracelets, I’ve come to realize that the case & dial are the most important criteria for me, and the older Exp II, Sub, and GMT simply beat out their newer counterparts in the looks department.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SS Oyster · 20 December 2018, 02:04 PM

Especially not crazy if going back to 16610 LV (Kermit)

carfanatic991 · 20 December 2018, 02:40 PM

I currently own both 16610 and 116610 and was recently offered a 116710 as a trade for my 16610. I tried on the 116710 but felt the GMT bezel with all the numbers too busy for me. I kept my 16610.

Both are great watch, pick which you like the best.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jrs146 · 20 December 2018, 02:45 PM

Lol old thread

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Onequik135i · 20 December 2018, 03:27 PM

Wow, almost a year later too. I sold my 114060 to go to a 4 liner 14060M. The newer 6 digit models aren’t as eye catching as the previous modes. Kind of like comparing a 993 Porsche to the newer replacement 996 generation (in my eyes that is).

Danj338 · 20 December 2018, 04:08 PM

I just sold my 116610ln and bought a 1985 gmt pepsi, also just got a 1016 and really love the small case 40 and even the 36. I don’t see Rolex ever going back to the smaller lug case. The only new I would buy would be the Daytona because it still looks like the older small case and those fit my wrist best. Still probably a year away from a Daytona.

fania123 · 20 December 2018, 09:54 PM

Nope! I just went from a 114060 to a 14060 and couldn’t be happier

reed · 20 December 2018, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snow-Dweller

Personally, I wouldn't be able to go back to the older bracelet.

I love so many older and vintage references, but I can't get over how insubstantial the bracelets and clasps feel. I admit I wish it didn't bother me.

CPRWATCH · 20 December 2018, 11:32 PM

Sold my SubC for this , & definitely no regrets .

Jason71 · 20 December 2018, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by regaltrojan

I'm thinking of flipping my 116710 for a 16610 now. I'm tired of the PCLs on the 116710 getting easily scratched. Any thoughts out there?

Personally, if it is just the PCLs that bother you.......just get them brushed by an expert. I prefer the 5-digit iterations myself, but I sure wouldn’t let PCLs get in the way of my enjoyment of a watch.

BTW, I would just wear it and enjoy it. My buddy has a 116710 as his only watch that he wears daily. His bracelet is now mostly brushed from just wearing the hell out of the dang watch. Life is too short..........

Nunez. Jacob · 21 December 2018, 01:31 AM

my dad went from 5 digit to 6 a couple of times he just traded a blnr for the sdk4 ,has all the good things from a 6 digit to a 5 digit case

101031-28 · 21 December 2018, 02:51 AM

I honestly just love how comfortable the 5 digits are.. Have a few 6 in my rotation and like to have both because there are many aspects of the 6 digits I really appreciate as well.

Brian Page · 21 December 2018, 03:20 AM

I've gone this way, the only sub I have now is a 5 digit SEL. For me it's the perfect Sub. For modern I love the new SS BLRO. You may want to consider adding the Sub if that is an option, if not - go for it!

R!$ · 21 December 2018, 04:10 AM

I can respect that choice

rmlovett1 · 21 December 2018, 04:46 AM

Not a bad trade if it’s what you like!

I prefer the 4 or 5 digit fit for myself as well. I wear 6 digit, and l love the references that I have. I enjoy all three iterations, and love aspects of each one. If you’re happy looking at your wrist...that’s what counts

24 April 2017, 02:50 AM	#38
Maiden "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 3,652	If thats what you want, why not. __________________ Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2

24 April 2017, 05:01 AM	#39
AzHadEnuf "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Ralph Location: Tucson, Arizona Watch: 6263,DJ,SUB,BB,THR Posts: 2,043	I've tried to buy a 116610 at least 3 times. I know it's a better movement, bracelet, clasp and bezel. I just wish it looked like this. But I prefer 6 speed manual transmissions to modern dual clutch transmissions. Go figure. __________________ "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." -A. Einstein

20 December 2018, 02:04 PM	#47
SS Oyster 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Posts: 9,218	Especially not crazy if going back to 16610 LV (Kermit) Attached Images

20 December 2018, 02:45 PM	#49
jrs146 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Josh Location: Lost in time Watch: Me Nae Nae Posts: 9,823	Lol old thread Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ "Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter

20 December 2018, 03:27 PM	#50
Onequik135i "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Tampa, Florida Watch: 116610LV Posts: 2,574	Wow, almost a year later too. I sold my 114060 to go to a 4 liner 14060M. The newer 6 digit models aren’t as eye catching as the previous modes. Kind of like comparing a 993 Porsche to the newer replacement 996 generation (in my eyes that is). __________________ 16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170

23 April 2017, 01:52 PM	#31
hishorology "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: U.S. Posts: 16	I much prefer the 5 digit references.

23 April 2017, 04:45 PM	#33
Alexwwjd "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Alex Location: Texas Watch: Out!!! Posts: 2,352	The less digits the better. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

23 April 2017, 06:22 PM	#34
strafer_kid "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Kenny Location: northern ireland Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs Posts: 5,136	Happens all the time.....we are spoilt with a great choice of watches! Just go for the one you want!

23 April 2017, 07:19 PM	#35
Loevhagen "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: The aperture Posts: 4,941	Had the 116613LB. Sold it and got the 16618LB Had the 116710BLNR. Sold it for a 16710 and three inserts instead. Had the 216570. Sold it. Use my wife's 16570 instead sometimes. Had the ... The 5-digit versions are perfection. :)

23 April 2017, 10:20 PM	#36
emersm 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: Merle Location: USA Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,542	No, your not crazy.

23 April 2017, 10:26 PM	#37
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	No IMHO you will have a better watch.

24 April 2017, 05:23 AM	#40
IT Nerd 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: VA Watch: me flip Posts: 1,021	Either are fine, both are better though!

27 April 2017, 08:54 PM	#42
jezza17 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Alex Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: DRSD Posts: 511	Go for it. I have gone 6 digit then back to 5 many times now. Even though there are some improvements with the new watches, they can't get the aesthetics quite right. The oversized super case are actually quite hideous to me. That's just me.

18 January 2018, 08:40 PM	#44
jezza17 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Alex Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: DRSD Posts: 511	I have gone 6 digit sub and GMT a few times and everytime I have gone back to the 5 digit. In my opinion, the super size case and hideous crown guards are nauseating. 4 or 5 digit for me any day.

20 December 2018, 11:24 AM	#45
regaltrojan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Hawaii Watch: 16600 et al Posts: 158	I'm thinking of flipping my 116710 for a 16610 now. I'm tired of the PCLs on the 116710 getting easily scratched. Any thoughts out there?

20 December 2018, 02:40 PM	#48
carfanatic991 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: SoCal Posts: 198	I currently own both 16610 and 116610 and was recently offered a 116710 as a trade for my 16610. I tried on the 116710 but felt the GMT bezel with all the numbers too busy for me. I kept my 16610. Both are great watch, pick which you like the best. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

20 December 2018, 04:08 PM	#51
Danj338 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Location: Midwest Posts: 184	I just sold my 116610ln and bought a 1985 gmt pepsi, also just got a 1016 and really love the small case 40 and even the 36. I don’t see Rolex ever going back to the smaller lug case. The only new I would buy would be the Daytona because it still looks like the older small case and those fit my wrist best. Still probably a year away from a Daytona.

20 December 2018, 09:54 PM	#52
fania123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: PHILA Posts: 1,726	Nope! I just went from a 114060 to a 14060 and couldn’t be happier

20 December 2018, 11:32 PM	#54
CPRWATCH "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Real Name: Paul Location: Chester UK Watch: Rolex GMT Master Posts: 4,600	Sold my SubC for this , & definitely no regrets . Attached Images

21 December 2018, 01:31 AM	#56
Nunez. Jacob "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: Hesperia Posts: 280	my dad went from 5 digit to 6 a couple of times he just traded a blnr for the sdk4 ,has all the good things from a 6 digit to a 5 digit case

21 December 2018, 02:51 AM	#57
101031-28 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: USA Watch: 1665 Posts: 4,764	I honestly just love how comfortable the 5 digits are.. Have a few 6 in my rotation and like to have both because there are many aspects of the 6 digits I really appreciate as well. __________________ He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex. Ian Fleming

21 December 2018, 03:20 AM	#58
Brian Page "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: USA Posts: 6,625	I've gone this way, the only sub I have now is a 5 digit SEL. For me it's the perfect Sub. For modern I love the new SS BLRO. You may want to consider adding the Sub if that is an option, if not - go for it!

21 December 2018, 04:10 AM	#59
R!$ Banned Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: SoCal Posts: 2,405	I can respect that choice

21 December 2018, 04:46 AM	#60
rmlovett1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Richard Location: GA Watch: YTBD Posts: 23,509	Not a bad trade if it’s what you like! I prefer the 4 or 5 digit fit for myself as well. I wear 6 digit, and l love the references that I have. I enjoy all three iterations, and love aspects of each one. If you’re happy looking at your wrist...that’s what counts

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)