15202 as casual watch

[GB-man]

Originally Posted by jem7v

I wonder which jumbo is more desirable. The blue dial or white dial?

Please tell me you're joking

[jem7v]

Originally Posted by GB-man

Please tell me you're joking

No I know the original is the most. I'm wondering though why the new 40th is doing so much better than the previous one for resale.

[lapince]

Originally Posted by jem7v

No I know the original is the most. I'm wondering though why the new 40th is doing so much better than the previous one for resale.

Because it's perfect, if to take the previous one I find the 300 looks better, the 40th is closest to the original...

[Watcheroo]

My 15202 is currently my daily watch and I couldn't be happier with it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[locutus49]

Most excellent, and I agree.

Originally Posted by Superburrito

As a kid, seeing old Bond films with Sean Connery wearing Rolex (even with tuxedo) is what started my lifelong interest in the brand. And on a NATO strap too! Awesome.

Anyway, I think the 15202 could probably be worn every day, obviously not to the gym or while chopping wood.

[jem7v]

Originally Posted by lapince

Because it's perfect, if to take the previous one I find the 300 looks better, the 40th is closest to the original...

But isn't the only difference in look between the 15300 and previous 15202 just the seconds hand?

I don't count thicker and screw down crown to effect the look that much.

[AK797]

Originally Posted by jem7v

But isn't the only difference in look between the 15300 and previous 15202 just the seconds hand?

I don't count thicker and screw down crown to effect the look that much.

Dial layout, tapisserie design, and thickness are other key differences.

[code.]

Originally Posted by jem7v

When I get the 15202 it will be my go to casual watch. With the 44 RG as like my once or 2x a week watch.

Why not RG44 Everyday


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jem7v]

Originally Posted by code.

Why not RG44 Everyday


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would if I wasn't getting the 15202 too. But I don't want people to freak out at work when I'm walking around with a giant gold thing on my wrist lol.

[code.]

Originally Posted by jem7v

I would if I wasn't getting the 15202 too. But I don't want people to freak out at work when I'm walking around with a giant gold thing on my wrist lol.

Boss mode though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[lapince]

Originally Posted by jem7v

But isn't the only difference in look between the 15300 and previous 15202 just the seconds hand?

I don't count thicker and screw down crown to effect the look that much.

Originally Posted by AK797

Dial layout, tapisserie design, and thickness are other key differences.

Exactly what said my friend Neil, and thickness does play a part in the looks

[jem7v]

Originally Posted by code.

Boss mode though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It would be boss mode.

Originally Posted by lapince

Exactly what said my friend Neil, and thickness does play a part in the looks

Well for the RO, I actually prefer the thinness. It makes it more elegant actually. I feel if you want a thick watch get the ROO.

And it's not THAT much thinner from the 15400. I had them both in my hands at the boutique recently. I actually liked the thinness. What I didn't care for was the 39mm size. I prefer maybe a 40mm. Also if they brought back the white dial. I really wanted a white dial 15202 40th. Kind of annoying they dropped it completely for this latest one. I guess it didn't sell well.