ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 May 2017, 04:40 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,385
|
I think the 36mm suits you better. Sorry if bats not what you want to hear lol
|
13 May 2017, 04:40 PM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,445
|
36 for sure. Just adjust it.
|
13 May 2017, 04:44 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: U.K.
Watch: 124060
Posts: 72
|
I would go Exp 39mm IMO, I did and don't regret it, the sub c does wear big and high. The Exp is more versatile and can be worn for all occasions. To me it's a more classy piece.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
13 May 2017, 04:44 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
If you can get the SubC to satisfactorily fit, then it is really worth considering as it is a super watch. Don't worry about the 'fake thing' - the vast majority of people won't notice you are wearing a Rolex.....this is way over played. Even if it turns out the SubC is not for you, you can easily move it on. Good luck!
|
13 May 2017, 05:23 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: U.S./Vienna, AT
Posts: 1,967
|
Get both, I have both of them and I love them.
|
13 May 2017, 05:26 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
|
Both okay, I would pick the Sub
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
13 May 2017, 05:53 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
Stay with 36mm. Perfect for you.
If you want a new one, get the new Explorer.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
13 May 2017, 05:57 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: London
Posts: 760
|
Reply
|
13 May 2017, 09:39 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
|
Keep the Explorer you currently have . I garantee you will regret spending a lot of $ on the 39mm version; it really looks foolish as opposed to the really nice one you already own. And that Sub... no, don't buy anything and stick to what you have.
__________________
Nick _________________________________________ 14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver |
13 May 2017, 10:00 PM | #40 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,133
|
They all look good IMO. For me, I have a SubC and use the bezel frequently and if you would get that utility out of it I think it's worthwhile to consider it. Otherwise again you can't go wrong with your current or either of the two options.
|
13 May 2017, 10:12 PM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 501
|
Been there done that with my skinny wrist. If you are in San Francisco drive down to LA and stop into the Rolex Service Center. Go up to the desk and say "I would like a permanent link removed from the 6 o'clock side for the purposes of centering the clasp" (bring all of your extra links with you if you have them). They will say - "OK". You will have a centered clasp and a bracelet that fits and feels great and save big bucks.
|
13 May 2017, 10:19 PM | #42 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,675
|
Going through this decision myself. Have you tried on a easier sub to see if it works better on your wrist? A 5513 or 14060 might work and with the money you save on buying a new rolex from an AD you could get the preowned fully serviced by RSC or a service person of your choice. You might also take less of a bath if you want to trade it later. Just my opinion.
__________________
The King of Cool. |
13 May 2017, 10:20 PM | #43 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,675
|
Quote:
__________________
The King of Cool. |
|
13 May 2017, 10:22 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: DFW
Posts: 193
|
Like others say, the 36 looks best on you, by far. It is a great fit.
While I personally prefer the sub, i do not think the sub looks better on your wrist due to width |
14 May 2017, 12:32 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bucuresti
Watch: a Rolex duo
Posts: 1,987
|
The 36 mm fits you excellent, the other 2 at the limit, you could also go for one of them. If you want to replace the 36, Sub would be the choice, if you have need for the bezel
|
14 May 2017, 12:41 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Got my sub at 25, a 16610, take a look at the previous model. They're a bit more... uh... less chunky. May work perfectly for what you're looking for
__________________
|
14 May 2017, 12:45 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,598
|
The 36 looks perfect.
If it fit me it would be my daily watch.
__________________
|
14 May 2017, 12:49 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: 114060 / 114300
Posts: 325
|
Whatever is singing too you ,despite size will be the correct one .The 36mm looks good
On you for sure . Have you considered a 39mm Oyster perpetual.?? |
14 May 2017, 01:42 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Will
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SubC, Pam, Speede
Posts: 3,146
|
Judging from photos 36 mm explorer looks the best.
|
14 May 2017, 01:45 AM | #50 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: TEXAS
Watch: 116610 LV
Posts: 417
|
|
14 May 2017, 01:45 AM | #51 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Dave
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Watch: Just one more
Posts: 1,062
|
Get the sub c! I have one being delivered in about an hour!!!
|
14 May 2017, 01:59 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 70
|
I also think you should stick with the 36, but if you do want to pick one of your options, go with the SubC.
|
14 May 2017, 02:58 AM | #53 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 318
|
Wow, thanks for all the feedback! I wasn't expecting so many people to be in favor of the 36mm Explorer.
I do agree that with the newer watches I'm really on the limit. My wrist is pretty flat on top so I didn't see much lug overhang, but any wider (tried the 42mm Explorer II) and it would be hanging off my wrist a little. I have tried all the bracelet adjustments. I did have a permanent link removed, so I have 3 links on the 6:00 side plus the linked riveted to the clasp = 4 links. Unfortunately my wrist is really thin on that side compared to the 12:00 side, so this is still about half a link too much. The new bracelets let you have 3 links + a half link attached to the clasp, which is perfect. I also thought about trying to find a new bracelet or clasp and swapping out with the current one, but with that price difference I could basically get one of newer watches from a trusted seller here. Plus, I kinda like the idea of a watch with a little more wrist presence if I can pull it off without looking goofy (although opinions here seem pretty split on whether that is the case with the newer watches, haha). Keep the ideas coming, thanks guys! |
14 May 2017, 03:13 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 537
|
As much as I prefer the Sub, I think the Explorer 39 looks awesome on you
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk |
14 May 2017, 03:18 AM | #55 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
Quote:
|
|
14 May 2017, 03:38 AM | #56 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
36mm Explorer looks perfect on you.
|
14 May 2017, 03:39 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Georgia
Watch: Rolex, PP
Posts: 69
|
I own a SubC date and a lumed Explorer 1, along with other watches. The lumed Explorer may be my favorite watch. I love how it wears.
|
14 May 2017, 05:12 AM | #58 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,081
|
I just showed these pictures to my wife. She thought the Sub was more youthful looking for a you, being a young man.
She didn't think the size of the watches made much of a difference. |
14 May 2017, 07:28 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,350
|
The 36mm is a perfect size for those with smaller wrists.
There is a trend of people wearing larger watches. However it is almost like the 80's and 90s when people wore clothes that were oversized. If you look at old photos or films from that era, people's attires look quite atrocious by today's standards. I am not saying in 20 years that larger watches will be gone. But it is best to find and wear watches that look appropriate for your wrist size. |
14 May 2017, 07:55 AM | #60 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
Both the lumed Explorer 39mm and the sub look too big for your wrist. Your current Explorer is perfect for you. You're lucky! Keep it and enjoy. Don't get caught up in the BIG WATCH hype.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.