ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 June 2017, 01:57 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Arnold
Location: Miami
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
*meanwhile over at Everest* Everest: "Yess, buy it, make a copy and flood the blogs with it" PS. Aren't you the Everest spokesperson from that other post I saw a few days ago? |
|
13 June 2017, 02:05 AM | #32 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Quote:
I like all things high quality, from good companies. I also like things for a good deals. That marathon strap is the best deal I've come across so far. My Marathon Rubber Strap Review I seriously doubt Everest strap will look anything like the rubber b strap, except for the fact that it will be vulcanized rubber and it will integrate with the case. Otherwise I think it will follow similar lines to the existing everest straps, which if you follow "the blogs" you'd know, have totally different designs, lines and shapes. |
|
13 June 2017, 02:19 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 289
|
I saw on Reddit yesterday speculation about Everest working on one for Tudors that will come with a clasp (or buckle).
|
13 June 2017, 05:18 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Global
Watch: Rolex and others
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
What you are saying makes no sense. I have owned several Rubber B straps for Daytona, Sub and Deepsea (my personal fave). Tang buckle version for Sub C & DSSD and the Daytona fitted for the deployment clasp. I can tell you that every single one of my RB's were all totally different models and all clicked right on its watch, looking super sharp / flawless. I saw another guy put up his Instagram posts with the everest strap on the left image that I pasted below. Thats a daytona of course and the strap fitment looks nothing like my RB looked. With regards to the Rb, I like the deployment version less that the tang version, because it tapers thin to the clasp. On steel that works, but on rubber it looks a bit feminine in my opinion. While I'm here , I will say that my wrist size is a good 7.5 inches and the tang buckle series rubber b on my DSSD is just great, with the return flap being held down nicely under the two loops. But if you have over 8 inches wrist, I would go with the clasp or velcro options instead. Those come in XL or bigger. my Sub on Rubber B is on the right side. Everest bands is on the left..... |
|
13 June 2017, 05:43 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
|
Correct rubber b told me I have to buy a random 18mm tang buckle or if I had the tudor leather strap use that,but I have the bracelet version so no can do.I asked if they will sell a buckle anytime soon.they told me no,they suggested buying a buckle for a couple of pounds from the ebay,so a crappy cheap buckle with a 250 dollar rubber strap not good really.I can't belive they don't provide the 18mm buckle.
|
13 June 2017, 05:47 AM | #36 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: East Hampton NY
Watch: me break clays..
Posts: 7,516
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex•Omega•Breitling•Grand Seiko•Tudor "No one on their death bed ever said I wish I worked more" My Grandma * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons * |
|
13 June 2017, 05:48 AM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
|
Quote:
|
|
13 June 2017, 09:11 AM | #38 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
brown would be interesting! lets see those pics
|
13 June 2017, 09:13 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Angelo
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 42,164
|
Yes, I'd like to see them as well.
__________________
Rolex Submariner Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue Tudor Ranger 79910 Nomos Club Datum 733 Nomos Metro 38 Stowa Flieger Classic 40 * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons * |
13 June 2017, 09:14 AM | #40 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
It's more like $250, I believe.
|
13 June 2017, 09:19 AM | #41 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: East Hampton NY
Watch: me break clays..
Posts: 7,516
|
I picked up an OEM deployment buckle with the distressed leather strap new for my HBB on eBay it was $250.
__________________
Rolex•Omega•Breitling•Grand Seiko•Tudor "No one on their death bed ever said I wish I worked more" My Grandma * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons * |
13 June 2017, 09:36 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
|
|
13 June 2017, 09:48 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
|
It looks good, but it feels a bit too "clean" for me. I think the vintage style clashes a bit with that deep, smooth black. That said, I'm a very big fan of the distressed leather straps, which is quite a different look.
|
13 June 2017, 07:55 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,600
|
|
13 June 2017, 08:09 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
|
The tudor bb everest band comes with a tang only .it's a prototype but it identical to what they will release in a couple of weeks.I prefer the new rubber b because of the new materials and the way it tapers to smaller diameter .hopefully rubber b will send me the new strap
|
13 June 2017, 08:25 PM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,600
|
Quote:
|
|
13 June 2017, 08:48 PM | #47 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
|
Thanks for the information.
|
13 June 2017, 08:52 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
|
Yes mate its a real shame they don't provide the 18mm buckle.but overall the rubber b is alot nicer looking than the new everest
|
13 June 2017, 11:20 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Arnold
Location: Miami
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 40
|
|
13 June 2017, 11:31 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Arnold
Location: Miami
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 40
|
I do follow the blogs, that's how I know that all of the posts seem to come out well after RubberB has released their stuff. Obviously when you're copying a product it takes a while to develop. Even if they change up the design a bit, is it purely coincidence that all Everest products come out after Rubber B? I wonder...
|
13 June 2017, 11:36 PM | #51 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Angelo
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 42,164
|
Quote:
The main reason I chose RubberB over Everest for my Explorer was the simple fact that it's a better looking strap.
__________________
Rolex Submariner Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue Tudor Ranger 79910 Nomos Club Datum 733 Nomos Metro 38 Stowa Flieger Classic 40 * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons * |
|
14 June 2017, 12:43 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
|
The reason I choose rubber b for my ceramic subs is the taper of the strap that everest straps do not have they are pretty much the same width at the lugs and down to the clasp.not as aesthetic as rubber b straps that have that nice taper .wide at lugs tapering down to alot smaller near the clasp or tang
|
14 June 2017, 12:46 AM | #53 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Angelo
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 42,164
|
Quote:
Exactly
__________________
Rolex Submariner Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue Tudor Ranger 79910 Nomos Club Datum 733 Nomos Metro 38 Stowa Flieger Classic 40 * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons * |
|
14 June 2017, 12:49 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
|
It's not mine its just a couple of pics I got from everest team 9 months ago.as I was asking them to make a strap for new tudor watches it will be a top seller.and they told me that were already working on it.I spoke to them last week asking for the official release date but they couldn't give me the exact date other than it will be released in June tang only In blue and black and maybe brown and will be the same as the pics I posted
|
14 June 2017, 12:54 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
|
This rubber b clearly looks nicer the fit is flawless,but it's more expensive and you have to buy a buckle |
14 June 2017, 01:16 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 9
|
|
14 June 2017, 01:21 AM | #57 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Submariner a
Posts: 467
|
Quote:
|
|
14 June 2017, 03:32 AM | #58 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Quote:
Besides, the fundamental function and design for each company's trademark products are quite different, not just the product reviewed in this thread. Rubber B Deployment series bands need to be cut, Everest orders to size. Rubber B did develop a glidelock series that is ordered to size and has some CF technology that Everest does not, but I believe that product was released after both companies launched their initial products. Anyway, I don't need to sit here and list all the many many differences in the products, when you can simply look at pictures and read descriptions. Call me what you will, "spokesperson", "Fan", but bottom line is I am a supporter and customer of both companies and have not said a bad thing about either. I don't sit here in defense of one or the other, but if you are gonna get involved in accusing one company of copying another, you should examine why you're motivated to badmouth and make sure you get all your facts confirmed. |
|
14 June 2017, 03:58 AM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Arnold
Location: Miami
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
The reason why I "bad mouth", (your words) or "express my opinion" (my words), is because my wife had an issue with a strap and the customer service treated her very poorly. I overheard the calls and the representatives did not want to work with her. She pointed out several flaws in quality and they blamed it on her rather than their faulty product. They lost us both as customers for life so I began to do a bit of research. I then stumbled upon RubberB but, seeing how crappy Everest had been, I decided to do a bit of research before purchasing and found out that RubberB was the original creator of the rubber strap for Rolex. They had been out for years before Everest even started their kickstarter. What I've seen unfold over the past few years is also what we see as an example on this thread. RubberB announces watch bands for Tudor and then suddenly, Everest is coming out with one. (That's called copying) The first couple of times I didn't pay much attention to it but now it is unmistakeable. They have been shady about their inspiration, where the bands are produced and quality throughout the years, therefore the same way you are a fan of the company, I am a fan of honesty and transparency. Sidenote: I didn't quote you or mention you in the Everest employees comment, that was a joke for someone else. But, I guess a guilty dog barks the loudest. |
|
14 June 2017, 05:15 AM | #60 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Quote:
Rubber B having launched the business prior to Everest doesn't change the fact that the designs are clearly different, which seemed to be what you initially implied was a "copying" issue. If you're alternatively saying the copying issue is that a company create a band for Rolex, and then another company ALSO create a band for Rolex, then of course you're right. That is copying. But it's an incredible stretch to use that in some negative light. It's business. People make accessories for the same product all the time. Obviously that's not your issue though. Your issue is that you feel your wife was wronged in some way, (which I'm sorry to hear). But none the less, I don't think that experience qualifies you or legitimizes the other claims you've made here (whether you were joking or not). Lastly, regarding the Tudor strap. Everest sent out a "coming soon" news letter more than 6 months ago announcing a Tudor Strap in the works. I'm not sure when Rubber B made their "coming soon" announcement, if there was one, but just because Rubber B released Theirs first doesn't mean they were the first one's to have the idea. And guess what!? Even if they were the first ones to announce it, who care's!? It's a free market. The design is clearly different. Both company's are confident and stand by their respective products. I for one am glad I have the choice between the two and don't agree with criticizing one company or the other for bringing some competition to what is an entirely luxurious and superfluous market. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.