The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 November 2017, 04:04 AM   #31
ttnpb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: So Cal
Watch: 16803
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
I don't see one here, just a reflection. There is a similar one at the top and all around the crystal. I'm familar with fakes, clones, super fakes and there is nothing obvious with this watch.
You must not be too familiar.

Handstack is wrong.
Crown position is wrong.
LEC is wrong.
Date is wrong.


It's not a Franken. It's a fake. A 200$ fake.
ttnpb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 07:51 AM   #32
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttnpb View Post
You must not be too familiar.

Handstack is wrong.
Crown position is wrong.
LEC is wrong.
Date is wrong.


It's not a Franken. It's a fake. A 200$ fake.
Sigh. I believe I've said already the LEC (correctly) isn't visible, and what you're seeing is a reflection that by coincidence looks slightly like a coronet. Everything you've pointed to you are wrong about except the hand stack which is a maybe.. as I and several others have said.

If it is a fake I'd guess 200 bucks wouldn't buy you one.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 07:56 AM   #33
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
Sigh. I believe I've said already the LEC (correctly) isn't visible, and what you're seeing is a reflection that by coincidence looks slightly like a coronet. Everything you've pointed to is wrong except the hand stack which is a maybe.. as I and several others have said.

If it is a fake I'd guess 200 bucks wouldn't buy you one.
So you think, even with OPs latest update, that its genuine?
Just curious.
OP was not paying "200 bucks" - did he make a bad call, by turning this down?
Thanks
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 08:07 AM   #34
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by GLADIATOR View Post
So you think, even with OPs latest update, that its genuine?
Just curious.
OP was not paying "200 bucks" - did he make a bad call, by turning this down?
Thanks
I still think it's possibly real, but OP made the right decision given the uncertainty + shady seller imo. If it was a $200 fake collectively we'd have seen one before I'd imagine.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 08:33 AM   #35
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,309
I've never seen so much incorrect or misinformation as in this thread.

Look at the hand stand - all you hand stack posters. The hour hand is clearly on the bottom - like it should be.

Tje dial is 100% genuine. I've never seen a fake dial for this watch that replicated a genuine dial.

The hands are genuine - unlike fake hands that are easy to identify.

Bezel insert is genuine too.

Too bad there are so many incorrect assumptions posted here.

Definitely appears to be the "bandwagon syndrome."
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 08:40 AM   #36
Tmac478
"TRF" Member
 
Tmac478's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Tony
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: RG Skydweller
Posts: 1,469
This thing looks pretty authentic to my untrained eye.

What I want to know is why are all these inquiries always for "a friend"?
Can't your friend join up and ask for him/her self?
To me, this is always very suspicious.
Tmac478 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 10:00 AM   #37
jcatt
"TRF" Member
 
jcatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Lost, but on-time
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
I've never seen so much incorrect or misinformation as in this thread.

Look at the hand stand - all you hand stack posters. The hour hand is clearly on the bottom - like it should be.

Tje dial is 100% genuine. I've never seen a fake dial for this watch that replicated a genuine dial.

The hands are genuine - unlike fake hands that are easy to identify.

Bezel insert is genuine too.

Too bad there are so many incorrect assumptions posted here.

Definitely appears to be the "bandwagon syndrome."
What are the metal looking pips between the even numbers on the bezel and the crystal? Don’t those look like some kind of retaining spring for the bezel, which is of course not how this model GMT’s bezel is held on. Perhaps reflections again?
JCATT
__________________
Daytona 116500, White Dial
Custom Daytona 116520/ 6263
Daytona 116520, Black Dial
GMT Master II Pepsi 16710
Cartier Roadster Chrono
jcatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 10:20 AM   #38
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,309
[QUOTE=Sprta;8072291]You think if someone wanted to sell a fake they could just post the picture of the watch here to get our comments to see how good or bad their fake

Deleted. Moved.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 10:22 AM   #39
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcatt View Post
What are the metal looking pips between the even numbers on the bezel and the crystal? Don’t those look like some kind of retaining spring for the bezel, which is of course not how this model GMT’s bezel is held on. Perhaps reflections again?
JCATT
It is nothing more than light reflecting off the markers.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 11:24 AM   #40
jcatt
"TRF" Member
 
jcatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Lost, but on-time
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
It is nothing more than light reflecting off the markers.
I understand what you are saying, but as light does not penetrate steel, how can those little blips be a reflection from the markers? The nubs I see are between the inside of the bezel insert, and the outside of the crystal- all outside of the rehaut. Are you saying it's a reflection from the camera flash?

To be certain I am not saying you are incorrect- you are the resident GMT expert- just wondering what I am seeing in that one full-frontal pic. I do see how it could be the play of light. Just wondering where it's coming from.
JCATT
__________________
Daytona 116500, White Dial
Custom Daytona 116520/ 6263
Daytona 116520, Black Dial
GMT Master II Pepsi 16710
Cartier Roadster Chrono
jcatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2017, 05:49 PM   #41
ttnpb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: So Cal
Watch: 16803
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
Sigh. I believe I've said already the LEC (correctly) isn't visible, and what you're seeing is a reflection that by coincidence looks slightly like a coronet. Everything you've pointed to you are wrong about except the hand stack which is a maybe.. as I and several others have said.

If it is a fake I'd guess 200 bucks wouldn't buy you one.
You are correct about the LEC.


I stand by everything else I said.

If the handstack is wrong, then the crown position is wrong. Simple as that. ETA Gmt movements have a noticeably lower crown position.
ttnpb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.