ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 February 2018, 11:32 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
|
|
10 February 2018, 11:39 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
|
[QUOTE=Frits1980;8267311]It looks great. But from that angle your wrist looks way bigger then a 7', looks more a 8/8.5' to me:)
Photo was taken during the hot summer in Hong Kong so the wrist probably expanded a quarter inch |
11 February 2018, 12:29 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
There are a whole host of brands who cater for smaller wrists, Patek, Lange, JLC etc, but AP is a pure sports brand, JA aside, and as such a small AP on a large wrist is the worse crime for me. APs should fill up your wrist, it should leave nothing on the field of your wrist.
|
11 February 2018, 01:02 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
|
11 February 2018, 01:03 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,406
|
|
11 February 2018, 01:57 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
I do not see how i can wear bigger then my sub: imgur . com/a/Zt7K3 (remove the spaces to view) I even think my submariner 14060m looks more proportional on my wrist then that one |
|
6 October 2019, 09:32 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 34
|
This is so true for me as well. 7 inch wrist and 15400 is really on the edge in terms of size, while 15300 very often looks too small..such a pain! But what is bothering more lately is the thickness of the bracelet on 15400 and 15300.. I feel that the 15202 is the only perfect royal oak for 7 inch wrist.
|
7 October 2019, 12:23 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Boston
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,051
|
6.5 here. 15450 looked like a joke on me. Bought a 15500 and pretty happy with it.
|
7 October 2019, 08:45 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: usa
Posts: 8
|
I have 6.5 inch wrist and 15450 is bit too small. 39 or 41 mm royal oak is a better fit for me.
|
7 October 2019, 12:18 PM | #40 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,367
|
Advice 15400/15450 on 6.8 wrist
15450 on my 6.3 in wrist 39mm might be better for your wrist size. So 15300 or 15202 |
7 October 2019, 12:32 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: World
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 855
|
I tried on both on my 6.5" wrist, and there is no way I would be able to pull off a 15400. It felt and looked huge. 15450 IMO is perfect for my wrist.
|
8 October 2019, 01:35 PM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Joyce
Location: SF and NYC
Watch: GMT, AP, DD,
Posts: 641
|
Quote:
That’s looks great on you. The white dial almost look sea foam
__________________
IG @crownthewatch |
|
8 October 2019, 04:49 PM | #43 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,367
|
|
8 October 2019, 07:29 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 198
|
|
8 October 2019, 10:15 PM | #45 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,367
|
|
9 October 2019, 02:17 PM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Joyce
Location: SF and NYC
Watch: GMT, AP, DD,
Posts: 641
|
Quote:
I may need one. I have a blue dial 15450 but would love this one too.
__________________
IG @crownthewatch |
|
9 October 2019, 10:02 PM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
Quote:
Looks fantastic.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 |
|
9 October 2019, 10:06 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
Finally, I scratch the bezel
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 |
9 October 2019, 10:19 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 198
|
|
9 October 2019, 10:22 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 198
|
My 15400 joining the party too
|
10 October 2019, 12:26 AM | #51 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,367
|
|
12 October 2019, 08:48 AM | #52 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
Quote:
Spot on. As is your previous post. The 15450 proportions aren’t really true to the original design, but I personally prefer the thicker case (hence why I’ve bought Sea Dwellers instead of Subs). My 15450 wears very similar to my Daytona. 39mm is perfect for a 6.8 wrist I would think, but not sure I’d pay the premium. Luckily I have a 6.5 wrist so didn’t have to make the decision! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
|
12 October 2019, 08:50 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
6.5 wrist. Anyone think the 15450 wears too small?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
12 October 2019, 08:27 PM | #54 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 198
|
Quote:
That being said if you have a smaller wrist then its a no brainer obviously, 37mm is great, its a RO after all. |
|
13 October 2019, 05:27 AM | #55 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,719
|
|
14 October 2019, 11:11 AM | #56 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,367
|
|
14 October 2019, 12:15 PM | #57 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,719
|
yeah i was eyeing them before they blew up but i just couldn't justify it since i got a day date a year ago. gonna wait a bit and get it when the time is right
|
19 October 2019, 05:04 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 161
|
39mm is the way to go which means 15202 or 15300 preowned.
They are very well made but I parted with a 15400 due to the proportions and size. It wears much bigger than 41m and does not sit well on the wrist. I don't miss it at all. |
20 October 2019, 07:37 PM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
My two 15450’s on 6.5” wrist Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
22 October 2019, 07:51 PM | #60 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: France
Posts: 32
|
Quote:
The +2mm gap is fully absorbed by the wider bezel. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.