ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 February 2018, 03:00 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 164
|
Anyone regret getting sub vs. sub date or vice versa?
I’ve found myself in the position of deciding between a sub and a sub date like so many others have discussed in previous posts. I’m curious about getting a more nuanced perspective on the decision compared to what I’ve seen before though.
Anyone regret making the decision to go with the sub or sub date after some time? What were your thoughts as you decided that the other option may have been better? I know that after the thrill of a new watch settles in and you get used to it you start noticing characteristics that weren’t readily apparent. For me I was always set on the sub without a date, until I tried on a sub date. That then had me thinking that the sub looked a bit plain and incomplete. I wear my pieces for myself, but a guilty part of me also wanted my watch to be more recognizable, and the cyclops certain helps with that. On the other hand the sub without the cyclops is super clean, symmetrical, and I wonder how much of a pain it will be to have to deal with part of the dial being obstructed by the cyclops. I guess it’s such a tough choice because both options are so good! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.