ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 June 2018, 02:09 AM | #31 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Grant
Location: U.S.
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt
Posts: 5,850
|
Could Rolex Explorer II 42 mm lose any more value?
Quote:
Agree. Go with what sings to you, if you can afford it. If you buy based on perceived cost or perceived value (or future resale value) in order to save some $$ you’ll end up flipping it. I have had the black dial 216570 and loved it, but I sold it and ended up with a diver (and I always have GMTs...). That’s my experience. YMMV. Happy hunting! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Just another WIS who loves to trade... |
|
11 June 2018, 02:19 AM | #32 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,676
|
Quote:
This.
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”. |
|
11 June 2018, 05:17 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 1655+216570
Posts: 498
|
Because I already had my dad’s 1655 I wanted either a GMT or Sub date, AD showed me this and I was sold. Bought my second expl II. Love it and has spent hours on my wrist washing our son, reading bed time stories, waking him up because of the lume, traveling for work, etc. This why the watch has a special value for me and it will get more and more special.... So buy the watch that sings to you! That is the only reason to go for a specific model Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk Pro |
11 June 2018, 05:39 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
It's great all around value
|
11 June 2018, 05:56 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: C.R.
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: ♛ BLNR | AK
Posts: 1,029
|
Anything you buy runs the risk of losing value. Obviously both models are mass produced so there isn't a lot of rarity between them. My advice would be to purchase the one that sings to you! The bonus is that both aren't hard to find so you should be able to try them on at any AD and make you decision then.
__________________
"The more I see, the less I know for sure." - John Lennon |
11 June 2018, 07:03 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 564
|
I am thinking about selling mine when 14060m shows up this week. Doh!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2 FACTOR AUTHENTICATION ENABLED. |
11 June 2018, 07:05 AM | #37 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,693
|
I think the Exp II is the best bang for your buck in the sports line up. Same movement as the GMT, its big and comfortable wth great tapered lugs and flies under the radar. It has the added bonus of being very rugged. I have both the polar and black and they are great. They tend to get the most wrist time.
|
11 June 2018, 07:57 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
|
Quote:
If they do that, I’m SO in!
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
|
11 June 2018, 10:44 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 164
|
I love my Explorer II and if you can pick it up for $5,900 that's a steal!
|
11 June 2018, 10:51 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: SoCal
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 62
|
I've never been a fan of the current Exp II---I always thought it was too big and I wasn't a huge fan of the orange GMT hand, but looking at how crazy everything else has gone, I'll say it's prob the best buy of a SS sports Rolex at the moment.
|
11 June 2018, 11:08 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 182
|
Get the Sub no date you won't regret it
|
11 June 2018, 11:10 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 182
|
|
11 June 2018, 11:23 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 663
|
Could Rolex Explorer II 42 mm lose any more value?
Could it lose value , sure ,could it gain , sure but I got this one regardless
|
11 June 2018, 11:26 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 182
|
|
11 June 2018, 12:05 PM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Houston
Watch: you, watch me!!
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
Bad idea, that takes away from the original intent of the tool that it was meant for, which is exploring caves/rocks/ etc. The ceramic would get broken too easily. OF COURSE, 99.999% of buyers will never use it like that, but.....
__________________
1956 6569 waffle dial 1994 14060 Sub on a RubberB 2014 Explorer II 246570 |
|
11 June 2018, 12:27 PM | #46 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Mike
Location: Illinois
Watch: BLNR VTNR PAM 915
Posts: 1,985
|
If you are looking for a watch to hold value buy the Sub, it's one of the most iconic watches in history. Add to that it appears Rolex will hand feed them into the market place for the near future at least, and that will definitely keep the value up.
The Exp II on the other hand, is available at every AD I've stopped in from coast to coast, usually in both colors, which would suggest it isn't a big seller for Rolex, thus the current price market. All that aside, pick the watch you like best, wear it and enjoy it. Who knows what the future brings in terms of economy, people's tastes, etc. |
11 June 2018, 12:29 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
|
I think the Explorer II is probably near rock bottom right now. Great time to buy
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
11 June 2018, 12:59 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 90
|
I just got a sub n I love it I mean I got few watches the two tone black face sky,the new James cam, datejust but I been wearing my sub everyday it’s amazing comfy
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 June 2018, 01:24 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Watch: 116234 214270
Posts: 39
|
You will never know about the future value. I bought an 16710 black GMT in 2004 and sold it 4 years later at the same price and very glad about its value. Today, the same model for the same year will cost around 2 times more.
What will happen to if ROLEX stop the production of this model for whatever reason? It may or may not happen. Therefore, go with what you like most. |
11 June 2018, 02:07 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Watch: SmurfDaytonaBLNR
Posts: 682
|
Buy a sub or you will always regret it. Plus the extra money that you are putting, that portion, you will always get back in full.
__________________
White Daytona 116520, Sub 116619LB, GMT II BLNR |
11 June 2018, 02:44 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Atlanta
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 174
|
This will sound familiar. At the end of the day, buy the one you want/like more! EXP II is a great watch, had one for 6 years, great looking, and very comfortable.
__________________
Rolex Explorer II 216570(gone) Rolex GMT Master II 116710 BLNR Omega Speedmaster If Columbus had turned back, no one would have blamed him. Of course, no one would have remembered him either Unknown |
11 June 2018, 04:07 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: H.
Location: USA
Posts: 567
|
Could Rolex Explorer II 42 mm lose any more value?
I never understood the appeal of the Sub ND, it’s just so plain.
If you’re going that route, get a SD4K, at least you have a date without a cyclops and it’s a nicer watch IMO. The explorer is a great watch in many ways: 1. All brushed 2. Date 3. GMT 4. 42 mm 5. Excellent white dial 6. Amazing lume 7. Cheaper than you other option 9. Less popular than Sub ND 10. Overall excellent value for the price Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
current collection: Patek 5712, Patek 5726 (white), Patek 5990, Patek 5524G, Rolex 116500 (white & black), AP 26331ST (Blue). |
11 June 2018, 04:57 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 11
|
Great feedback thanks for the responses I will definitely post in about 5 weeks when I make my purchase I love both watches the only question is which do I love more if I get the Explorer 2 will I always have a Submariner box that needs to be checked and which is most likely the easiest to get out of if one day I wish
|
11 June 2018, 08:37 PM | #54 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,676
|
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”. |
11 June 2018, 09:20 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
11 June 2018, 09:23 PM | #56 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Lose value? Are we still on the Rolex forum?
|
12 June 2018, 02:00 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Easton PA
Posts: 581
|
Sorry, is your question which is the better watch or about re-salability? I don’t buy watches with the anticipation that I’m going to be selling them, so it’s a non issue for me. I love the Explorer II for its looks and function, although due to my wrist size I went with the 16570 40mm. It’s a far better watch for me than a ND sub. Nevertheless there are huge numbers of fans for the ND sub and if you love it, no other watch will do, it is iconic. Get what speaks to you, don’t worry about resale value.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
12 June 2018, 02:34 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DC Metro
Posts: 327
|
IMO the Exp II and Milgauss are the hidden gems in today's Rolex world.
The skyrocketing price/demand for a few popular models (looking at you 16710 and the new releases) hasn't touched the EXP or MG yet, and they remain highly desirable and modestly priced watches. Don't tell anyone though. |
12 June 2018, 04:46 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Matt
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: The Next One
Posts: 50
|
I have been struggling with the same conundrum but the polar 216570 instead of black dial.
I am fortunate to have several watches and perhaps that is why I went with the watch I really love and last week bought the polar 216570! Iike so many have said, I would go with what you love rather than what may be desirable in the future! For me I love the scarcity of the explorer unlike the ubiquitous subs and GMTs I see everywhere (don’t get me wrong I have an LV and BLNR) but I love the big dial, fat hands and orange 24 hour hand. To be honest you can’t go wrong and I expect will get both when circumstances allow! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12 June 2018, 04:59 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: J
Location: CO
Watch: Sub & ExpII
Posts: 555
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.