ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Mephist · 12 October 2018, 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

Jubilee bracelets originally had the "Oyster" clasps and did so for decades--yea verily, for generations.

I know, but I still prefer the hidden clasp even if Rolex did it wrong for generations before getting it right for a decade or so and then making it all wrong again

GradyPhilpott · 12 October 2018, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mephist

I know, but I still prefer the hidden clasp even if Rolex did it wrong for generations before getting it right for a decade or so and then making it all wrong again

Well, like I said I'm a big fan of the Super Jubilee, as I have one on my DJ 116200 63600. Mine fits me well, regardless of the weather, as I tend to wear my watches loose anyway.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

q8rolex · 12 October 2018, 06:27 AM

i prefer the look of the hidden clasp.

lord91 · 12 October 2018, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mephist

I know, but I still prefer the hidden clasp even if Rolex did it wrong for generations before getting it right for a decade or so and then making it all wrong again

Exactly

R!$ · 12 October 2018, 08:11 AM

to make DJ more sporty

DahMan · 12 October 2018, 10:45 AM

I bought the DJ41 Jub,and traded for Oyster, becuase of no hidden clasp, like I had on an old DJ36.
The easy link on the jubilee, just lost the classic design elements of the hidden clasp.
I believe Rolex could of easily designed a 5mm second notch to accommodate a hidden clasp, but saving it for day\date.

Very disappointed they offer easy link on 36mm Jub’s now.

challer · 12 October 2018, 10:21 PM

I much prefer the SJ compared to J. I have both. SJ is much more comfortable and better looking. I don't use the easy link. I feel that many people keep the watch too tight. I live in DC through brutal heat and fly every week. So if any one would need it, I would.

fixinbones · 14 October 2018, 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 77T

This is a good reason for Rolex to work some genius engineering on the SuperJ clasp to keep the clean seamless connection with the bracelet plus add the micro adjustable capability. Might be a completely different mechanical implementation but needs to be done.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Surely they’ve got be able to do this!

12 October 2018, 06:27 AM	#33
q8rolex "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: kuwait Posts: 270	i prefer the look of the hidden clasp.

12 October 2018, 08:11 AM	#35
R!$ Banned Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: SoCal Posts: 2,405	to make DJ more sporty

12 October 2018, 10:45 AM	#36
DahMan Banned Join Date: Mar 2018 Location: Florida Posts: 635	I bought the DJ41 Jub,and traded for Oyster, becuase of no hidden clasp, like I had on an old DJ36. The easy link on the jubilee, just lost the classic design elements of the hidden clasp. I believe Rolex could of easily designed a 5mm second notch to accommodate a hidden clasp, but saving it for day\date. Very disappointed they offer easy link on 36mm Jub’s now.

12 October 2018, 10:21 PM	#37
challer "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: DC Posts: 679	I much prefer the SJ compared to J. I have both. SJ is much more comfortable and better looking. I don't use the easy link. I feel that many people keep the watch too tight. I live in DC through brutal heat and fly every week. So if any one would need it, I would.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)