ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 August 2018, 11:39 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,574
|
Good choice.
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170 |
16 August 2018, 12:47 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: London/NY
Posts: 275
|
#3 for me.
|
16 August 2018, 02:33 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: London
Posts: 111
|
#3 for me.
I recently purchased a new old stock version of the watch from a dealer for €6000 (got a slight discount so the price isn’t so bad). Wonderful watch and it looks amazing when worn casually |
16 August 2018, 08:09 AM | #34 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
3 for me as well.
|
16 August 2018, 12:43 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 141
|
Two watches with 3186 Random on left with thin marker dial VS M serial on right $1175 difference...... What to do? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 August 2018, 10:37 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: World
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 855
|
Wow I didn't know there was a thin marker dial. It'll likely be worth more in the future due to its rarity. However, I prefer the one on the right with the darker markers. I think darker markers gives it more contrast and looks better.
I own a 3186 exactly like the one on the right, you won't regret it! |
16 August 2018, 11:13 PM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: FL
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
Both have engraving, both have 3186, and both have SEL. Granted both are in same condition...go for the one thats $1175 less... |
|
16 August 2018, 11:40 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Moon
Posts: 125
|
Right one. Thin markers does nothing to me.
|
16 August 2018, 11:48 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Colin
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16710
Posts: 1,336
|
What is a thin marker dial?
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "Z" Serial COKE Montblanc 1858 Iced Sea BLACK |
17 August 2018, 12:10 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,574
|
Wasn’t even aware the Polar had a thinner marker dial version, if you look closely at the Lume circles Colin you will notice the thinner black paint lined circles vs the thicker circles version on the right side.
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170 |
17 August 2018, 12:34 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Colin
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16710
Posts: 1,336
|
Thank you, I’d never heard of or noticed that dial variant before.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "Z" Serial COKE Montblanc 1858 Iced Sea BLACK |
17 August 2018, 02:57 AM | #42 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,181
|
#2
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
17 August 2018, 09:26 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 141
|
Here are better photos of the “Thin Marker” variant. It honestly looks great in person almost a maxi dial effect? The lume marker seem flat compared to the normal.
https://www.chrono24.com/en/rolex/ex...US&SETCURR=USD Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 August 2018, 09:51 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
|
@rl96701
If you're actually considering the 214270 MK2 Explorer I would opt for this one. No contest. ________________ Instagram: @onthedial |
17 August 2018, 10:36 AM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
|
Quote:
I agree that the thin marker look nicer with bigger lume. Here is my random serial polar 3186 movement and you can see the thinner marker. This is great watch and I will strongly recommend this watch if you consider to add the explorer in collection. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Watching date changes every midnight |
|
17 August 2018, 09:45 PM | #46 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: not stil
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex n Omega
Posts: 1,327
|
Not sure I’m digging the “thinner marker” version. Just looks off and not as crisp.
Not to throw a complete wrench in your plan but I bought a no-holes case exp ii polar from the for sale section a couple years ago in the very low $4k range.. No box/ papers but who cares. Just paying extra for those. Can’t wear them. |
18 August 2018, 07:57 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: TN Valley
Watch: Too many...
Posts: 490
|
At this point in time, I'd only buy a 5-digit with papers...also, not a fan of the thinner markers on the 16570. IMHO, I wouldn't get too hung up on the 3186 movement...the 3185 is a proven workhorse.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.