ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

adawil2002 · 27 November 2018, 12:14 AM

16550 or 16570, prefer the 16550 with the white gold markers, hands and cream 'rail' dial.

The 16570 has black marker surrounds and a face that will stay white over time.

Boaters · 27 November 2018, 12:45 AM

6 digit Polar for me

landroverking · 27 November 2018, 03:04 AM

Five for me.

Saaci · 27 November 2018, 10:49 AM

I struggled with this exact question. I ended up getting the 16570 because I liked the smaller hands and case, wears lighter and is a little more under the radar. Some of the pros of the 216570 in my opinion are the gmt hand, the lume and the depth of the dial. The 16570 can seem a bit flat with the small makers. On the flip side the dial is expansive and open, almost like a polar tundra.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fort Rolex · 27 November 2018, 11:28 AM

6 digit for sure

Rebelinst · 27 November 2018, 11:42 AM

5 all day

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nikrnic · 27 November 2018, 11:44 AM

I preferred the 6 digit for my own. It sits and fits very comfortable and low on my 7" flat wrist. It's 42mm but with the smaller crown guards and crown of the twinlock it doesn't feel that big to me once l bought it and compared it with my SubC

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

SFmedic13 · 27 November 2018, 11:50 AM

for me the 6, but go with your Corazon....

jed11 · 27 November 2018, 11:56 AM

6 digit vote for me...live the orange hand.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

auto4me · 27 November 2018, 12:17 PM

Was able to try on both and went with the 216570. 16570 was comfortable but didn’t feel as robust. Maxi dial and a blue lume sealed the deal for me.

uansari1 · 27 November 2018, 02:31 PM

I prefer the 40mm size, so I’d say 5 digit. The 6 digit is heftier for sure, but don’t expect the 5 digit to fall apart on you lol...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Relentless · 27 November 2018, 03:05 PM

The 6-digit is more my flavor - black or polar I don't care, I love them both. Did you get one yet?

They are on my short list of potential next additions, along with 116618LB and some vintage Rolex models.
B

hdrazor251 · 27 November 2018, 04:41 PM

No question for me...it's a 5!!

abozz · 27 November 2018, 07:57 PM

Rolex is one of the few companies that improve ale
ways his products, 6 digits is better for me.

cajerseyboy · 27 November 2018, 08:06 PM

If you have 6 digits now in the sub and blnr than go with 6 digit EII. I actually purchased a 5 digit explorer II and had to return it a day later to get a 6 digit instead. Get the 6. You won’t be disappointed.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

watchwatcher · 28 November 2018, 12:35 AM

Well, for me it comes down to the bracelet of the six digit. I will go with the bracelet that has fewer permanent links and easy link. Because after all...you do wear the watch, right?

And for all the touters of the aesthetics of the five digit, I really don't get where you're coming from with the tuna can clasp on the five. That would be a war stopper for me no matter what the face of the watch looked like.

encarter13 · 28 November 2018, 01:41 AM

I went back and forth on this for a while. I went with the 5 digit for a few reasons:

1 - I already own modern references, so a 5 digit got me into the "almost" vintage market.

2 - I prefer the red hand

3 - I planned on wearing it mostly on Nato and Rubber B, so the modern bracelet did not sway my decision

RolexDad · 28 November 2018, 02:02 AM

Definitely try on both of these in person if you have the chance. To me, they are so different in size, feel and overall aesthetic, that they are not even really close. Looking at them side by side on the internet is fine, but it gives the illusion that these watches are more similar than they really are.

My bias is to the 216570, as that’s what I own. It is definitely a much more vibrant watch than its predecessor. For reference, I prefer the vibtage 5-digit 40mm and 36mm watches to their modern equivalents for virtually every reference beaides the ExpyII.

doramas · 28 November 2018, 02:26 AM

16570

droptopman · 28 November 2018, 02:42 AM

I went 5 digit early tritium dial on my 16570. My other watches are 6 digits and the Polar gives me a nice vintage vibe. If I still had my collection of 4 digit Subs and GMT's I would have went modern as I like them both. But the 5 just fit better in my current set. Just had it serviced by RSC this year and it is ready for many more years of service!

eltonbalch · 28 November 2018, 02:43 AM

I’ve owned both and prefer the six digit model for the bracelet, new movement, and larger hands. You really need to try it on in person because (to me) it does not really seem larger than my LV. The lugs taper in nicely as opposed to the square look of the supercase and the stainless bezel blends with the bracelet so it seems smaller than it is. I have a 7” wrist and the size seems fine to me. If I’m really unsure about size, I’ll use a mirror and see what it looks like to others. Watches appear siightly larger (to me) when viewed directly on your own wrist. Buy the one you like, of course. You can’t go wrong with either one.

sensui · 28 November 2018, 08:49 AM

Imo 5 digit polar and 6 digit black.

withthesword · 28 November 2018, 09:43 AM

5 digit is the only way to go

27 November 2018, 12:14 AM	#1
adawil2002 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Real Name: Andrew Wilson Location: Brunswick, Maine Watch: 16550 Explorer II Posts: 1,773	16550 or 16570, prefer the 16550 with the white gold markers, hands and cream 'rail' dial. The 16570 has black marker surrounds and a face that will stay white over time. Attached Images __________________ 6284 SS, 16014 SS Jubilee silver stick, 16253 TT Blue Thunderbird, 16550 SS Exp II Cream, bought in 1986, 116400GV Z-blue Milgauss, 79260 Tudor, 116660 DSSD-Blue, 116500LV Daytona White, 116710 BLNR, 326934 Blue Skydweller

27 November 2018, 11:42 AM	#6
Rebelinst "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: New York Posts: 38	5 all day Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Instagram: watch_gb #pepsifever

27 November 2018, 02:31 PM	#11
uansari1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Doha, Qatar Watch: Polar 16570 Posts: 535	I prefer the 40mm size, so I’d say 5 digit. The 6 digit is heftier for sure, but don’t expect the 5 digit to fall apart on you lol... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Explorer II 16570 Polar (3186) GMT Master II 116710LN GMT Master II 126710BLRO (jubilee) Explorer 124270 Omega Seamaster GMT 50th Anniversary

27 November 2018, 03:05 PM	#12
Relentless "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: AL / GA Posts: 153	The 6-digit is more my flavor - black or polar I don't care, I love them both. Did you get one yet? They are on my short list of potential next additions, along with 116618LB and some vintage Rolex models. B __________________ ♛ 116610LV SUBMARINER "HULK" ♛ 116660 DEEPSEA SEA-DWELLER D-BLUE MK I ♛ 126710BLNR GMT II “BATMAN”

27 November 2018, 04:41 PM	#13
hdrazor251 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Jeff Location: Arizona Watch: is recovered!! Posts: 4,255	No question for me...it's a 5!! __________________ 16753 GMT Master, 16613 Bluesy, 16710 GMT Master II, 16570 Polar Explorer II-Stolen & Recovered!! Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

27 November 2018, 12:45 AM	#2
Boaters 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD Posts: 10,653	6 digit Polar for me

27 November 2018, 03:04 AM	#3
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	Five for me.

27 November 2018, 10:49 AM	#4
Saaci "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2018 Location: New York Watch: 16570 Posts: 300	I struggled with this exact question. I ended up getting the 16570 because I liked the smaller hands and case, wears lighter and is a little more under the radar. Some of the pros of the 216570 in my opinion are the gmt hand, the lume and the depth of the dial. The 16570 can seem a bit flat with the small makers. On the flip side the dial is expansive and open, almost like a polar tundra. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

27 November 2018, 11:28 AM	#5
Fort Rolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: New Jersey Posts: 586	6 digit for sure

27 November 2018, 11:44 AM	#7
Nikrnic "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Real Name: Louis Nick Ric Location: Michigan, USA Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs, Posts: 10,172	I preferred the 6 digit for my own. It sits and fits very comfortable and low on my 7" flat wrist. It's 42mm but with the smaller crown guards and crown of the twinlock it doesn't feel that big to me once l bought it and compared it with my SubC Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

27 November 2018, 11:50 AM	#8
SFmedic13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2017 Real Name: SANTIAGO Location: San Antonio Texas Watch: None Currently Posts: 581	for me the 6, but go with your Corazon....

27 November 2018, 11:56 AM	#9
jed11 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: West Side Posts: 2,718	6 digit vote for me...live the orange hand. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

27 November 2018, 12:17 PM	#10
auto4me "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Cali Posts: 68	Was able to try on both and went with the 216570. 16570 was comfortable but didn’t feel as robust. Maxi dial and a blue lume sealed the deal for me.

27 November 2018, 07:57 PM	#14
abozz "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: In my home. Watch: 116660, 126600 Posts: 2,905	Rolex is one of the few companies that improve ale ways his products, 6 digits is better for me.

27 November 2018, 08:06 PM	#15
cajerseyboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Northern Cal Watch: me find "the one" Posts: 747	If you have 6 digits now in the sub and blnr than go with 6 digit EII. I actually purchased a 5 digit explorer II and had to return it a day later to get a 6 digit instead. Get the 6. You won’t be disappointed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 116610LN 216570 116710BLNR 116610LV 116500LN 116519LN

28 November 2018, 12:35 AM	#16
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,044	Well, for me it comes down to the bracelet of the six digit. I will go with the bracelet that has fewer permanent links and easy link. Because after all...you do wear the watch, right? And for all the touters of the aesthetics of the five digit, I really don't get where you're coming from with the tuna can clasp on the five. That would be a war stopper for me no matter what the face of the watch looked like.

28 November 2018, 01:41 AM	#17
encarter13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Real Name: Nick Location: Georgia Posts: 2,613	I went back and forth on this for a while. I went with the 5 digit for a few reasons: 1 - I already own modern references, so a 5 digit got me into the "almost" vintage market. 2 - I prefer the red hand 3 - I planned on wearing it mostly on Nato and Rubber B, so the modern bracelet did not sway my decision __________________ Instagram - watches_wine

28 November 2018, 02:02 AM	#18
RolexDad "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Northern CA Watch: Too many Posts: 120	Definitely try on both of these in person if you have the chance. To me, they are so different in size, feel and overall aesthetic, that they are not even really close. Looking at them side by side on the internet is fine, but it gives the illusion that these watches are more similar than they really are. My bias is to the 216570, as that’s what I own. It is definitely a much more vibrant watch than its predecessor. For reference, I prefer the vibtage 5-digit 40mm and 36mm watches to their modern equivalents for virtually every reference beaides the ExpyII.

28 November 2018, 02:26 AM	#19
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	16570

28 November 2018, 02:42 AM	#20
droptopman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Real Name: Mark Location: Washington State Watch: SUBS and GMT's! Posts: 9,664	I went 5 digit early tritium dial on my 16570. My other watches are 6 digits and the Polar gives me a nice vintage vibe. If I still had my collection of 4 digit Subs and GMT's I would have went modern as I like them both. But the 5 just fit better in my current set. Just had it serviced by RSC this year and it is ready for many more years of service! __________________ Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today? Ty: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score. Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers? Ty: By height.

28 November 2018, 02:43 AM	#21
eltonbalch "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Cambridge, NY Posts: 1,089	I’ve owned both and prefer the six digit model for the bracelet, new movement, and larger hands. You really need to try it on in person because (to me) it does not really seem larger than my LV. The lugs taper in nicely as opposed to the square look of the supercase and the stainless bezel blends with the bracelet so it seems smaller than it is. I have a 7” wrist and the size seems fine to me. If I’m really unsure about size, I’ll use a mirror and see what it looks like to others. Watches appear siightly larger (to me) when viewed directly on your own wrist. Buy the one you like, of course. You can’t go wrong with either one.

28 November 2018, 08:49 AM	#22
sensui 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 12,443	Imo 5 digit polar and 6 digit black.

28 November 2018, 09:43 AM	#23
withthesword "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Matte Location: Toronto Watch: 16570 Posts: 1,006	5 digit is the only way to go __________________ Ready. Ready. Hack. My Flickr Photostream Wishlist: 1984 gmt

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)