ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
11 December 2018, 02:49 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 113
|
A big man needs a too boku size watch.
|
10 January 2019, 01:28 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
|
11 December 2018, 04:15 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Hendricks
Location: USA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 826
|
6.5 went with the 15450 . Tired the 15400 it looked way off and even tho I like the watch have to pass for that size. So I knew the 15450 is the one
|
11 December 2018, 05:39 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,899
|
15450. I have a 7" wrist and I owned a 15400 for about a year. It always looked too big and I never wore it. The 15450 is a beautiful watch in a more classic size that doesn't make you look like you're compensating.
|
12 December 2018, 04:23 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 4,535
|
It's just a matter of personal preference how you like it on your own wrist. But based on the very close up pictures, I'd say the 450 looks better imo and I wear the 15400. Would be better to take shots of your wrist from further away to get a better idea.
|
12 December 2018, 04:31 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: California
Watch: PP,AP,Rolex,IWC
Posts: 578
|
15450
|
12 December 2018, 05:54 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Mark
Location: Europe
Posts: 644
|
Would buy a used 15202. I bought one recently for usd21k in perfect condition with white dial. Much nicer than either 15400 or 450. I own the 15400 blue dial and find it too big (17cm wrist).
|
12 December 2018, 10:06 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: California
Watch: 26420RO
Posts: 448
|
Could go either way, depending on how much presence you want.
Also, the 41mm may have higher resale value (just guessing) when you want to flip it in the future.
__________________
Current collection: AP 26420RO.OO.A002CA.01, PP 5164A, AP 15202BA, Omega 310.32.42.50.01.002, Tudor m79030b-0003, Garmin Epix Gen 2 Waiting for: AP 126715ST.OO.1356ST.01 |
12 December 2018, 10:44 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
|
My wrist is 6.75", and was fully expecting the 15400 to be too big. I went all over the Diamond District today, and found that the 15450 was definitely too small for me. The 15400 was a large watch for sure, but in a good way. Even saw a woman working at one of the booths wearing a 15400! Also at Motion in Time, they referred to the 15450 as a woman's watch when I pointed to it, lol.
|
12 December 2018, 01:31 PM | #10 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,406
|
Quote:
At 6.75, a 15400 will be enormous. I have a 7 and found it way too big. To each their own but 37mm is hardly a women's watch, too small for me at 7" but at 6.5 or so, should be perfect. Why I stick to 39's. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
12 December 2018, 03:43 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
|
|
12 December 2018, 09:30 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 136
|
|
5 January 2019, 03:33 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
Off-topic but that watch was opened and put back together by a hack watchmaker ... I don't know if it is funny or painful but it sure makes me dizzy.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
5 January 2019, 04:36 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 136
|
|
4 January 2019, 09:02 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: N/A
Watch: Royal Oak
Posts: 345
|
It depends on your wrist shape, if you have a flat wrist 6.75inches, a 15400 should be fine. Rounder wrist you might have to go with the 15450ST.
|
4 January 2019, 10:30 PM | #16 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,406
|
Quote:
I have a 7" flat wrist and owned a 15400, found it too large. The dial is enormous on it. I think had they made the bezel thicker and dial smaller, it may have worn better. Sold it and bought blue 15300. Vs 15300: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
5 January 2019, 02:18 AM | #17 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: PAM512
Posts: 333
|
Quote:
Both of those look excellent on your wrists to me. At the end of the day, it all comes down to personal taste. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
13 December 2018, 04:10 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
|
Thanks! Wish the rose gold was within my budget.
|
14 December 2018, 02:19 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: AP||Panerai||Rolex
Posts: 759
|
|
14 December 2018, 02:28 PM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: California
Posts: 1,250
|
The 37mm looks best.
|
15 December 2018, 02:31 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ray
Location: Berkeley, CA
Watch: IG @watch.kakashi
Posts: 2,579
|
15450st is what I have now. And I feel it's more wearable as a daily.
I used to have a 15400st and though I felt I can pull it off with the flat wrist, it eventually felt too large. If I want a an FU AP that's too big for me and not give a care, it'll be an ROO |
30 December 2018, 12:52 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 259
|
I think the wrist shot is always a bit deceiving because they are taken mostly by mobile phone cameras that are just 6 inches away from wrist making the distortion way too higher than how actually th watch wears. It’s mostly the third persons view that decides if the watch wears nice or large. I suggest any referencing for wrist wearability of the watch is done through mirror and not directly over the wrist.
I have 6.5” wrist (although flat) and I think 15400 and 26331 is just a perfect fit for me. Both are 41mm and I think they work like a charm on my small-ish wrists as well. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
30 December 2018, 10:35 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 259
|
This is how nicely the 15400 wears on 6.5” wrist, when looked through third persons perspective. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
4 January 2019, 06:15 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: The Nature Boy
Location: Pacific Ocean
Watch: 116610LV, 214270
Posts: 54
|
This looks fantastic. I really do think the traditional “wrist close-up” is deceiving in that it distorts the relative size of the watch - especially so with the RO. I’m grappling with the same question now (15450 vs. 15400), and in my experience the 15400 fits much more comfortably on my 6.75” flat wrist.
|
4 January 2019, 06:19 PM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 259
|
Quote:
This is exactly right mate. When we take wrist shots, the mobile camera is usually like 3” away from watch and it causes image distortion and shows watch as blown out of wrist, whereas, in all practical terms, the watch doesn’t flare out that bad. So this picture is of the same 41mm but ROC which is even more thicker than 15400, and photo taken from mobile camera but only from maybe 1.5 feet away resulting in lesser lens distortion. Even on my tiny 6.5” wrist, the RO/ROC case doesn’t flare out, as you can see. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
4 January 2019, 10:30 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: US
Posts: 265
|
I like the 15450
|
5 January 2019, 02:09 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Posts: 883
|
15450 gets my vote.
|
5 January 2019, 08:47 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: NYC
Posts: 61
|
Get what you think fits better...it's all preference. Similar wrists have had Offshores and Concepts forced upon them so a 15400 is hardly a stretch.
|
10 January 2019, 01:25 PM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
I personally went for the 15450 and think it looks better on you as well
|
10 January 2019, 04:17 PM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Internet
Posts: 3
|
15400 looks fantastic on you. I would go for that one
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.