ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

lhawli · 21 March 2019, 01:18 PM

Based on the outcome from Rolex this Basel, you would have thought the easies and most logical one was an updated Sub with the 3235 caliber!

Why did this not happen? I don’t care and I’m quite happy with my LV with the iconic 3135 “proved the test of time” caliber but still doesn’t make any sense!

Lastly, I realized (please calibrate me here), Rolex doesn’t just update the caliber without even making the slightest of esthetic changes, even if it’s just as silly as discontinuing a oyster bracelet for a jubilee. So what does that mean for the Subs? I’ll be dammed if they get a bracelet other than a brushed oyster - so could be a new case, thinner lugs, or even a 41?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

21 March 2019, 01:18 PM	#1
lhawli "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Montreal, QC Posts: 1,256	Why Didn’t the SUB Get An Updated Movement? Based on the outcome from Rolex this Basel, you would have thought the easies and most logical one was an updated Sub with the 3235 caliber! Why did this not happen? I don’t care and I’m quite happy with my LV with the iconic 3135 “proved the test of time” caliber but still doesn’t make any sense! Lastly, I realized (please calibrate me here), Rolex doesn’t just update the caliber without even making the slightest of esthetic changes, even if it’s just as silly as discontinuing a oyster bracelet for a jubilee. So what does that mean for the Subs? I’ll be dammed if they get a bracelet other than a brushed oyster - so could be a new case, thinner lugs, or even a 41? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro __________________ AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)