The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 19 April 2019, 03:38 AM   #1
FrontHeadlock
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 377
On the Sky-Dweller and Annual Calendars

The Annual Calendar has always struck me as one of the "least bang for your buck" complications available, and it that vein I think it makes the Sky-Dweller a bit overrated from a complications perspective.

First, consider the lack of importance of an annual calendar. While one might wish to time something on a chronograph, or have a reference timezone on a GMT, the annual calendar is surprisingly useless. When it comes to the calendar, having a date complication is useful, because especially if one is not near an electronic device, remembering the exact date can sometimes be a pain. It's quite common for people to forget the date, and so having the date on one's watch can solve that problem. Similarly, one can also easily forget the day of the week, and so even the Rolex Day-Date is a complication of some use.

But how often does one forget the MONTH? I'd guess almost never. And even at the end of a month into a new month, the date complication tells you all you need to know. Is today May 1? You aren't sure. A quick look at your watch will show "31" and the absurdity of April 31 will lead you to conclude quickly that it's May 1.

Some might say that an annual calendar is a benefit because you only have to change the date once a year, but that is overstated. Because most months have 31 days, you only have to change the date on a watch with a date complication 5 times per year compared to once for an annual calendar. And on any watch with a quick date set, it's as simple as advancing the date by a single day 4 times per year. Not too big a deal. On the other hand, a perpetual calendar is actually quite impressive not only for its feat of engineering, but also because an owner quite possibly will not have to change the date for his entire life, or only once at the absolute most.

Once a watch has a date complication, pretty much ANY other complication is more useful to me than an annual calendar, and if I want a calendar complication, the perpetual is vastly superior.

For those reasons, the annual calendar complication on the Sky-Dweller is fairly overrated. In fact, given that the watch is marketed as the ultimate watch for frequent travelers, I actually think the day of the week combined with the GMT and the date would have been more useful, or even a complication that would give the wearer the day of the week (or the date) for both the current time zone as well as the 2nd time zone, since someone who travels long distances might forget that the other time zone is a different date or day of the week.

Any arguments to the contrary?
FrontHeadlock is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.