ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

huba01 · 12 July 2019, 04:38 PM

16610 and 14060 4 liner . The no date is just a classic and versatile too as its the only Rolex that looks perfect on a nato strap imo

faimag · 12 July 2019, 07:18 PM

Same as above but 2-liner 14060. I was surprised also but I came to realize they are quite different watches. However if you just have one of them and thinking about getting the second, I would opt for a GMT instead.

sillo · 12 July 2019, 10:53 PM

Yup and I love both. I'm a big 5 digit guy so I also plan on adding a 16600 for some serious redundancy.

I think they're different enough to appreciate each in their own way and I guess it also helps that one of mine is matte and the other is glossy.

brandrea · 12 July 2019, 11:17 PM

Many here have both.

I have the 114060 (lucky TRF) and a SD43 which is somewhat similar to the Submariner date.

They are different enough in my book.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

peterpl · 12 July 2019, 11:26 PM

Redundant imho.

Just keep the date and sell the ND

jrs146 · 12 July 2019, 11:31 PM

I have in the past. Eventually the no date was sold and now I just have a few subs. But the no date is a great watch.

encarter13 · 13 July 2019, 12:49 AM

I do not have both. If I did, I would not have two black references.

I would have a Black 114060 and then add a LVC, Two Tone, or Gold reference.

12 July 2019, 10:53 PM	#33
sillo "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Sean Location: NY Watch: 5 Digit Posts: 2,840	Does anyone have both the no date and date submariner? Yup and I love both. I'm a big 5 digit guy so I also plan on adding a 16600 for some serious redundancy. I think they're different enough to appreciate each in their own way and I guess it also helps that one of mine is matte and the other is glossy. __________________ 14060 \| 16570 \| 16600 \| 16700 \| 16800 \| 79260 @TheGMTHand

12 July 2019, 11:31 PM	#36
jrs146 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Josh Location: Lost in time Watch: Me Nae Nae Posts: 9,823	I have in the past. Eventually the no date was sold and now I just have a few subs. But the no date is a great watch. __________________ "Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter

13 July 2019, 12:49 AM	#37
encarter13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Real Name: Nick Location: Georgia Posts: 2,613	I do not have both. If I did, I would not have two black references. I would have a Black 114060 and then add a LVC, Two Tone, or Gold reference. __________________ Instagram - watches_wine

12 July 2019, 04:38 PM	#31
huba01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Dubai Posts: 1,449	16610 and 14060 4 liner . The no date is just a classic and versatile too as its the only Rolex that looks perfect on a nato strap imo

12 July 2019, 07:18 PM	#32
faimag "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: US, SG, DK, GR Watch: Reverso Posts: 3,089	Same as above but 2-liner 14060. I was surprised also but I came to realize they are quite different watches. However if you just have one of them and thinking about getting the second, I would opt for a GMT instead.

12 July 2019, 11:17 PM	#34
brandrea 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 78,097	Many here have both. I have the 114060 (lucky TRF) and a SD43 which is somewhat similar to the Submariner date. They are different enough in my book. Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

12 July 2019, 11:26 PM	#35
peterpl Banned Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: . Posts: 6,692	Redundant imho. Just keep the date and sell the ND

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)