The most luxury and prestige Rolex

[Brew]

Originally Posted by Tridor

None of those pimp magnets is an example of luxury, IMHO.

Right. Because putting diamonds on luxury watches never results in luxury.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by beshannon

Certainly none of those

Your poll was lacking

Have to agree personalty would not like to seen wearing any of those so called Rolex watches.But today many think that luxury and prestige Rolex all come down to the cost price.

[Hutrmila]

What a topic ... Daytona Platinum or DD YG ifffff ... wouldn’t even call on Nadal’s diamond Daytona ... for daily wear we still talk about rare SS or TT models ... on top of all of it Rolex is still different league then Patek - AP - VC etc. where we talk big figures I guess ...so asking one’s the question about most prestigious or valuable Rolex you may easily end up auctioning Paul Neuman’s Daytona .... would you wear it though

Hey, let’s talk ‘bout serious and interesting things out of Rolex world ... nice evening to all genuine Rolex aficionados


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[NateThaGreat]

You’re all crazy! I’d rock that rose gold rainbow Daytona all the time and I’m by no means a fan of bling! They’re just cool


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[alphasports]

Hideous every one! Unfortunate that people associate crass "money" with crass "prestige". Humans are idiots sometimes. The fact there are enough humans wanting these watches for Rolex to produce them is even sadder.

[Pantheon]

Originally Posted by alphasports

Hideous every one! Unfortunate that people associate crass "money" with crass "prestige". Humans are idiots sometimes. The fact there are enough humans wanting these watches for Rolex to produce them is even sadder.

you must be the life of every party you go to

[BrianSims]

yeah,Precious metal for sure welcome but diamonds and rocks are not my preference either

[Rori]

From one of my photoshoots. I had to bodyguards for Rolex present with the watches.

[JSolution]

Eye of the tiger for me, anything yellow gold works for me

[Tridor]

Originally Posted by Brew

Right. Because putting diamonds on luxury watches never results in luxury.

It doesn't in THOSE particular configurations.

[fooey]

yuck!

[Fleetlord]

All ROLEX watches are luxurious and prestigious.

[Erson]

Originally Posted by Fleetlord

All ROLEX watches are luxurious and prestigious.

sub steel is not prestigious, too many people own it. its so standard.

its a cool watch, but too much people who own, therefore not prestigious

[Zakalwe]

Interesting responses with a few demonstrating a degree of loss of self-awareness.

The vast majority of humanity would consider most people on here - the sorts of people who have spent a minimum of a five-figure sum (i.e. more than the average global citizen’s annual income) on ornaments that tell time less accurately than a 20 buck Casio to be crass, ostentatious posers, rather than the tasteful, discerning watch hobbyists most of us might claim to be.

I like the Sub, though personally if I was spending however much money it costs on one watch, I probably wouldn’t be buying a Rolex.

[schoolboy]

My answer would be a 36mm yellow gold DD with champagne dial.



And I think that watch is prestigious on this forum and outside of it.

[Erson]

Ronaldo must have a high taste. Look at his career, look at his girlfriend, look at his house, look at his cars.

People who says ronaldo have a bad taste is wrong. Its his high class taste

[BigBoy17]

Yuck

[pepsiretail]

New Pepsi!

[Bigblu10]

Originally Posted by NateThaGreat

You’re all crazy! I’d rock that rose gold rainbow Daytona all the time and I’m by no means a fan of bling! They’re just cool


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Me too. If I had FU money the rainbow Daytona RG would be on my wrist.

[Patton250]

Originally Posted by Zakalwe

Interesting responses with a few demonstrating a degree of loss of self-awareness.

The vast majority of humanity would consider most people on here - the sorts of people who have spent a minimum of a five-figure sum (i.e. more than the average global citizen’s annual income) on ornaments that tell time less accurately than a 20 buck Casio to be crass, ostentatious posers, rather than the tasteful, discerning watch hobbyists most of us might claim to be.

I like the Sub, though personally if I was spending however much money it costs on one watch, I probably wouldn’t be buying a Rolex.

The vast majority of humanity doesn’t care about watches nor do they pay attention to our Watches. I swear some people give too much credence on how much other people pay attention to their own personal interests. What you think and like is just not that important to the vast majority of other people. Sorry.

[Patton250]

Originally Posted by Bigblu10

Me too. If I had FU money the rainbow Daytona RG would be on my wrist.

Bro most of those watches are for people who live in the capital city of the hunger games franchise.

[Zakalwe]

Originally Posted by Patton250

The vast majority of humanity doesn’t care about watches nor do they pay attention to our Watches. I swear some people give too much credence on how much other people pay attention to their own personal interests. What you think and like is just not that important to the vast majority of other people. Sorry.

That is somewhat beside my point. I know and agree that most people don’t notice our watches.

I think it’s hypocritical to say “anybody who buys the watches posted in the OP has no taste or is a poser” as some have implied, whilst wearing something which if an average person knew what it was/what it cost would judge you similarly. It’s a double standard displayed on here frequently.

[doramas]

None of those. The most prestigious watch is the Day-Date in any of its versions.
Those others are pure vulgarity

Enviado desde mi SM-G930F mediante Tapatalk

[Mystro]

Originally Posted by padi56

Have to agree personalty would not like to seen wearing any of those so called Rolex watches.But today many think that luxury and prestige Rolex all come down to the cost price.

^^^Bingo. Also, a watch is a barometer of your financial status, is extremely short sighted. For example..”He wears a SS Rolex because he can’t afford a PM model”..... That is a ridiculous assumption.

[THC]

Ohpf for all 5

[Watch This]

.

[Speed]

Why do you ask?

[Patton250]

Originally Posted by Zakalwe

That is somewhat beside my point. I know and agree that most people don’t notice our watches.

I think it’s hypocritical to say “anybody who buys the watches posted in the OP has no taste or is a poser” as some have implied, whilst wearing something which if an average person knew what it was/what it cost would judge you similarly. It’s a double standard displayed on here frequently.

I can’t relate to what you’re talking about. My neighbor owns a $40,000 Harley Davidson. I don’t judge him. Our other neighbor spends at least that much traveling the world every year. That money he’ll never get back and no one judges him. So what you’re saying is if they knew I had a day date and I explain to them how much it cost they would judge me? That’s what you’re saying? I thought most people on this thread are only accusing those watches of being hideous. I absolutely love German cars. If I saw someone driving around in a pink with purple polkadots R6 I would say their car was hideous.

[HogwldFLTR]

None are in my range of interest or affordability; I voted for the Platona... well for obvious reasons!!!

[GradyPhilpott]

To me it would be a toss-up between these two.