ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 March 2009, 12:03 AM | #31 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ally
Location: Surrey (UK)
Watch: 15223
Posts: 638
|
Quote:
In turn, I would question why someone living in New York City feels the need to wear a commercial divers watch (DSSD). Each to their own. AJF |
|
27 March 2009, 12:09 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
everyone should wear what makes them happy!!!! im just saying i think that rolex is gearing their 36mm towards women... i think its obvious with the pics from basel...if u enjoy wearing a 34mm 15223 thats great!!!! always do whatever makes u happy!!!!
|
27 March 2009, 12:14 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
yes we know, you never miss an opportunity to share your wonderful erudite opinion with the rest of the members: "36mm is a woman's watch!!!!" and then you wonder why some people get upset with you? it doesn't take a rocket scientist eh? dudes don't like being told they're wearing a dudette's watch. a lot of guys here still wear 36mm watches, and the last time i checked, rolex (and many other watch manufacturers) still make and market them to men.
|
27 March 2009, 12:15 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
i think the comment also about the deepsea is fair... i just like the look of the watch... i have never gone diving in my life....
|
27 March 2009, 12:15 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Jarrett
Location: San Antonio TX
Watch: ing everybody
Posts: 1,515
|
Is that for real? Say it aint so, say it aint so!
|
27 March 2009, 12:17 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
Quote:
|
|
27 March 2009, 12:18 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
|
|
27 March 2009, 12:21 AM | #38 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,940
|
Quote:
Of all those I've sold, it's the watch I miss the most:
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
|
27 March 2009, 12:22 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Cambridge Ma
Posts: 2,331
|
I like 36mm so I suppose that makes me a lady.
__________________
Yunnoworameenmiduck |
27 March 2009, 12:24 AM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
Quote:
Maybe we can persuade the Rolex"giant" to put his stock comment in his signature line - that will save him a lot of time copying and pasting |
|
27 March 2009, 12:25 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
ok.. fair enough.... how about 36mm is a unisex size.... would that be better
|
27 March 2009, 12:25 AM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
yuk!
|
27 March 2009, 12:26 AM | #43 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,940
|
That would definitely allow me more wardrobe choices.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
27 March 2009, 12:29 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
|
27 March 2009, 12:39 AM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
Quote:
|
|
27 March 2009, 12:43 AM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Cambridge Ma
Posts: 2,331
|
Quote:
Go Patriots--they wear 36mm I believe.
__________________
Yunnoworameenmiduck |
|
27 March 2009, 12:49 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
u know whats funny... it seems the better looking the woman... the bigger her watch is.... lol lol lol... in manhattan i see a lot of women wearing 40mm
|
27 March 2009, 12:52 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Cambridge Ma
Posts: 2,331
|
I have to admit to looking at other parts of the female anatomy rather than their wrists.
__________________
Yunnoworameenmiduck |
27 March 2009, 12:55 AM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Watch: PP AP RM
Posts: 794
|
36 is a classic dress watch
|
27 March 2009, 12:57 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
I still love that watch and hope to have it or a 116234/116231 with the same style dial.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
27 March 2009, 12:59 AM | #51 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
|
27 March 2009, 01:00 AM | #52 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
Quote:
|
|
27 March 2009, 01:02 AM | #53 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
|
ya see...
Quote:
Charlie Sheen wears a mid sized Yachty and it also looks disp... A "41D" would make it all right ! |
|
27 March 2009, 01:02 AM | #54 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
|
27 March 2009, 01:07 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
|
27 March 2009, 01:08 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
|
|
27 March 2009, 01:41 AM | #57 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 54
|
I agree. . .1000%
. . Nothing looks more silly (or posturing) as a 40mm on a less than 7.5" wrist. One who has self-esteem, sizes a watch by their physical dimensions. For me at 5'-7" and 142-lb, a 36mm watch is perfect, and I would own nothing else, as it's looks silly to have a Coke can on a skinny wrist.
|
27 March 2009, 02:01 AM | #58 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Charlotte NC
Watch: SD & Exp II
Posts: 961
|
Quote:
They just don't look right on my 7 3/4" wrist
__________________
16600 Sea-Dweller 16570 Explorer II (White Dial) |
|
27 March 2009, 02:29 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: David
Location: SW Fla
Watch: SS Daytona & TT DJ
Posts: 1,430
|
I guess when the watch business started, the purpose was to tell the time and a wristwatch was more convenient than a pocket watch. Now with everyone over 5 years old carrying a cell phone the time is irrelevant. They've become a fashion statement. Some guys like a thin plain wedding ring while some like a band that goes from knuckle to knuckle. IMO the 36mm is still a mans watch that looks good on some women. The dress watch isn't meant to be obtrusive. I would'nt like the feel of my cuff links banging around on a DSSD. Course the last time I wore cuff links was the senior prom so I guess I'm full of s***.
|
27 March 2009, 02:51 AM | #60 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,940
|
Perhaps Rolex shouldn't allow their ADs to sell any sport watches to anyone who needs a link removed.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.