ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

zak98 · 7 August 2009, 12:26 AM

as well.. more on board with the tt black now.. i like the white text on dial vs. the gold text of old.

bokmeipai · 7 August 2009, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmr

i can't for the life of me see any reason to buy a sub instead of the gmt master unless you want a simpler watch. it's the same watch with 1 less complication. i guess if you like the blue that would be a little motivation but if i want a black tt i will just buy the tt gmt.

I agree the GMT II rocks !

Perdu · 9 August 2009, 11:10 AM

You don't get a 120 click bezel on a GMT IIc if that's important.

Perdu · 9 August 2009, 11:12 AM

I thought that the old Sub was 13mm thick, so is the new Sub 0.5mm thinner? But the above material shows the existing case as 12.17mm.

Anyway, I think the new black sub is cool. Never really liked the blue and still don't.

Putnam Dan · 27 August 2009, 03:07 AM

I'm looking to buy my first Rolex. My father worked with Comex Pro so has always work a Submariner on a Nato band and I cannot get the thing out of my head when looking for a new watch.

Any idea what the price will be in the US and if it's worth the trip Aruba?

Putnam Dan · 16 September 2009, 02:24 AM

Ouch $10,400 for the black ceramic tt. Better start collecting the pennies and hopefully by Christmas I'll be a new owner

lwildcatz · 18 September 2009, 02:18 PM

This is a different subject, but I think the WG Blue Sub is THE most beautiful watch in the world.

I will always be on SS budget and really can't afford that!

Rags · 13 October 2009, 01:15 PM

I'll take one of each please...Put it on my account.
On account of I must be out of my friggin mind to think I could afford 2 brand new subs..

deserted · 13 October 2009, 02:30 PM

I'm commenting on this because i'm a TT black sub owner, the new bezel for the TT black sub looks very crisp and robust it has a very mature look to it, the blue to my surprise grabs you when you see it in person, the smurf blue really does compliment the watch itself......I have tried both of them on and it if i could afford it i would attain both...

ArcticMoose · 1 November 2009, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Putnam Dan

Ouch $10,400 for the black ceramic tt. Better start collecting the pennies and hopefully by Christmas I'll be a new owner

Is that the best price offered in the US?

ersnyder · 2 November 2009, 01:22 AM

I hate to be the odd man out, but the blue looks OK to me; I like it!

ArcticMoose · 2 November 2009, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ersnyder

I hate to be the odd man out, but the blue looks OK to me; I like it!

I am very quickly getting used to it.

Name: 091102 RT.jpg
Views: 1457
Size: 85.4 KB

ersnyder · 2 November 2009, 01:32 AM

Funny how that works huh?!

deserted · 10 December 2009, 03:49 PM

Excellent review very in depth......

mmmmp · 9 January 2010, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lwildcatz

This is a different subject, but I think the WG Blue Sub is THE most beautiful watch in the world.

I will always be on SS budget and really can't afford that!

Me too! (On both points)

I personally do not like those big lugs / super-case enhancements, but both pieces, in thier own way, are beautiful. The W/G cobalt blue is my grail...maybe someday.

Mark

sea-dweller · 11 January 2010, 03:05 PM

Great post, with great info.

Mystro · 20 January 2010, 12:09 AM

I am not digging the new case. Looks to me like Rolex forgot a machining step. I love the old blue.The blue always separated itself from its much more common black steel model. It was also more nautical and fit the Submariners theme. The new blue looks less demetional and flatter.
IMO the new Sub looks older than the current model its replacing.

My Serti Sub wasnt going anywhere anyway. After 12years of ownership and I still love the look over any other Rolex.

ahl2easy · 21 January 2010, 05:39 PM

has any one seen the new 116613 blu dia serti?....

jnkay · 23 January 2010, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ahl2easy

has any one seen the new 116613 blu dia serti?....

Nope, but a whole lotta black sertis

rayt · 24 January 2010, 10:57 AM

i must say the new two tone blue sub ceramic is better than the black one.i like the blue looks really cool and classy to me!i even prefer it than the old blue in the aluminum bezel.the lume is also awesome.am happy i got one in hk!worth it!

RREngr · 25 January 2010, 09:16 AM

I picked up the TT black a couple of months ago, I ended up switching the band because it is out of proportion with the size of the watch. Until I find something I like better, I'll stick with the rubber dive band, Mike.

ahl2easy · 15 February 2010, 05:21 PM

i have seen the 116613 blk dia serti, has anyone seen the Blu dia serti?

norfolktommy · 16 February 2010, 06:46 AM

ok, new to forums full stop!! i like the sub blue dial blue bezel 16613 gold/stainless bracelet. what do you think will be the best price I should pay for one brand new???

RRGHOST1 · 19 February 2011, 07:17 AM

Well i think the 116613 LB blue is nicer than the old one, better clasp too.

7 August 2009, 12:26 AM	#31
zak98 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: TN Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,166	as well.. more on board with the tt black now.. i like the white text on dial vs. the gold text of old. __________________ Z- Submariner; P- Airking; R- DateJust; M- GMTII; C0 - Milgauss GV Breitling SuperOcean Heritage 46 Omega Speedmaster Racing Panerai PAM390

9 August 2009, 11:10 AM	#33
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	You don't get a 120 click bezel on a GMT IIc if that's important. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

9 August 2009, 11:12 AM	#34
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	I thought that the old Sub was 13mm thick, so is the new Sub 0.5mm thinner? But the above material shows the existing case as 12.17mm. Anyway, I think the new black sub is cool. Never really liked the blue and still don't. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

13 October 2009, 01:15 PM	#38
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	I'll take one of each please...Put it on my account. On account of I must be out of my friggin mind to think I could afford *2 brand new subs..* __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

11 January 2010, 03:05 PM	#46
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Great post, with great info. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

27 August 2009, 03:07 AM	#35
Putnam Dan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Putnam, NY Posts: 13	I'm looking to buy my first Rolex. My father worked with Comex Pro so has always work a Submariner on a Nato band and I cannot get the thing out of my head when looking for a new watch. Any idea what the price will be in the US and if it's worth the trip Aruba?

16 September 2009, 02:24 AM	#36
Putnam Dan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Putnam, NY Posts: 13	Ouch $10,400 for the black ceramic tt. Better start collecting the pennies and hopefully by Christmas I'll be a new owner

18 September 2009, 02:18 PM	#37
lwildcatz Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Alabama Posts: 26	This is a different subject, but I think the WG Blue Sub is THE most beautiful watch in the world. I will always be on SS budget and really can't afford that!

13 October 2009, 02:30 PM	#39
deserted Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: fort wayne IN Watch: Patek 1909003 Posts: 2,176	I'm commenting on this because i'm a TT black sub owner, the new bezel for the TT black sub looks very crisp and robust it has a very mature look to it, the blue to my surprise grabs you when you see it in person, the smurf blue really does compliment the watch itself......I have tried both of them on and it if i could afford it i would attain both...

2 November 2009, 01:22 AM	#41
ersnyder 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Eric Location: Long Beach CA USA Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 4,102	I hate to be the odd man out, but the blue looks OK to me; I like it!

2 November 2009, 01:32 AM	#43
ersnyder 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Eric Location: Long Beach CA USA Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 4,102	Funny how that works huh?!

10 December 2009, 03:49 PM	#44
deserted Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: fort wayne IN Watch: Patek 1909003 Posts: 2,176	Excellent review very in depth......

20 January 2010, 12:09 AM	#47
Mystro 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: The Mystro ;) Location: Central Pa. Posts: 15,507	I am not digging the new case. Looks to me like Rolex forgot a machining step. I love the old blue.The blue always separated itself from its much more common black steel model. It was also more nautical and fit the Submariners theme. The new blue looks less demetional and flatter. IMO the new Sub looks older than the current model its replacing. My Serti Sub wasnt going anywhere anyway. After 12years of ownership and I still love the look over any other Rolex.

21 January 2010, 05:39 PM	#48
ahl2easy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: giterdonedawg Location: Montana Watch: 116610LN Posts: 13	has any one seen the new 116613 blu dia serti?....

24 January 2010, 10:57 AM	#50
rayt "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Earth Watch: must be rolex Posts: 630	i must say the new two tone blue sub ceramic is better than the black one.i like the blue looks really cool and classy to me!i even prefer it than the old blue in the aluminum bezel.the lume is also awesome.am happy i got one in hk!worth it!

25 January 2010, 09:16 AM	#51
RREngr "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Central Illinois Posts: 76	I picked up the TT black a couple of months ago, I ended up switching the band because it is out of proportion with the size of the watch. Until I find something I like better, I'll stick with the rubber dive band, Mike. Attached Images __________________ It's always something, it ain't never nothing 116613N Submariner

15 February 2010, 05:21 PM	#52
ahl2easy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: giterdonedawg Location: Montana Watch: 116610LN Posts: 13	116613 blu dia serti, has anyone seen one yet i have seen the 116613 blk dia serti, has anyone seen the Blu dia serti?

16 February 2010, 06:46 AM	#53
norfolktommy "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: norwich Posts: 1	ok, new to forums full stop!! i like the sub blue dial blue bezel 16613 gold/stainless bracelet. what do you think will be the best price I should pay for one brand new???

19 February 2011, 07:17 AM	#54
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,997	Well i think the 116613 LB blue is nicer than the old one, better clasp too.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)