The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 May 2020, 12:07 AM   #31
Matt129
"TRF" Member
 
Matt129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 100
With your wrist size you should be able to handle the S43 as a daily. I think they are the best sport watch Rolex is making right now.
Matt129 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 12:10 AM   #32
Frits1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
No brainer, sub. Sd43 is a short sleeves watch only
Frits1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 12:18 AM   #33
franktehtank
"TRF" Member
 
franktehtank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
I just went through this conundrum in my own collection, except with a 114060 SubC. My two cents below:

I had the SD43, bought the no date sub, then lived with both for about a month. The SD43 looks incredible and is an extremely cool watch, but as a daily it was slightly too bulky and heavy for me. The sub is just more versatile and more comfortable IMHO.

I would have kept both as a rotation, but I prefer to have a small collection and there ended up being too much overlap for me in the two watches, visually. I sold the SD43 a few days ago. My wrist is about 7.5" btw.

YMMV.
franktehtank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 12:38 AM   #34
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by franktehtank View Post
I just went through this conundrum in my own collection, except with a 114060 SubC. My two cents below:

I had the SD43, bought the no date sub, then lived with both for about a month. The SD43 looks incredible and is an extremely cool watch, but as a daily it was slightly too bulky and heavy for me. The sub is just more versatile and more comfortable IMHO.

I would have kept both as a rotation, but I prefer to have a small collection and there ended up being too much overlap for me in the two watches, visually. I sold the SD43 a few days ago. My wrist is about 7.5" btw.

YMMV.


Do you have a pic of the sub on wrist? Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 12:39 AM   #35
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frits1980 View Post
No brainer, sub. Sd43 is a short sleeves watch only


Kind of my reservation for sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 01:18 AM   #36
franktehtank
"TRF" Member
 
franktehtank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
Do you have a pic of the sub on wrist? Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So, uploading photos on this is kind of a pain. But here you go. Sorry for the low res but it wouldn't let me upload anything larger.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_6545.jpg (125.8 KB, 327 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7001.jpg (107.8 KB, 328 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7014.jpg (110.1 KB, 329 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7016.jpg (109.0 KB, 325 views)
franktehtank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 01:31 AM   #37
Rori
"TRF" Member
 
Rori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by franktehtank View Post
So, uploading photos on this is kind of a pain. But here you go. Sorry for the low res but it wouldn't let me upload anything larger.
SD43 looks smaller
__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible.
Rori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 01:36 AM   #38
franktehtank
"TRF" Member
 
franktehtank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rori View Post
SD43 looks smaller
I guess the magic (or curse, depending how you look at it) of the supercase!
franktehtank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 01:49 AM   #39
SilverKast
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Canada
Watch: always one more...
Posts: 142
I have a 7.5" wrist as well and owned the SD43 and currently the 114060. I loved the look of the SD43 and found the size and fit wasn't an issue for me at all.

What I did dislike was the weight of the SD43. It was noticeable on my wrist to the point where it annoyed me. I prefer the weight of the 114060 as it isn't noticeable like the SD43 was.

Both are great watches, but for me the SD43 wasn't a good choice as my daily driver. Maybe as something to wear as a change up would work. Maybe I'll get another one and get back to you later lol.
SilverKast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 01:56 AM   #40
alphadweller
"TRF" Member
 
alphadweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 6,193
To the OP, I think your 7.5in wrist would probably look better with the SD43 especially if it's flat. Also, I find the 126600 to be a more handsome watch than the 116610LN. The $2,500 price difference is well worth it IMHO.

I realise the Sub has a larger fan club and the SD43 is controversial. If that makes you sleep better, get the Sub. Else you probably already know which watch is superior in all respects and addresses the deficiencies of its sibling.

I didn't hesitate when faced with the same choice 3 years ago.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frits1980 View Post
No brainer, sub. Sd43 is a short sleeves watch only
And yet its fliplock extension is designed to fit over a long sleeve wetsuit :-).
alphadweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 01:57 AM   #41
atn_uk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 162
I have the same sized wrists as you, and until recently owned both the Sub and the SD43.

I sold my Sub - as I was never wearing it.

SD43, for me, is much better - bigger dial, more wrist presence, all round better proportions.

I do not find it an issue regarding the height when wearing a shirt or sweater, though you would for sure have an issue if you wear these tight, which I don't.

The one thing I would also recommend is to have the diver's extension removed when getting the bracelet sized. It is quite a bit of metal, and for me (and many others) I found it to make the watch uncomfortable to wear, albeit the extension is a cool device. But you still get the sub-like quick size extension on the clasp, and I personally did not find the divers extension would or could ever be used, as it is really meant for when wearing a scuba outfit, so the extension is way to big, so you'll leave it closed all the time anyway. Unless you want to wear it over your shirt/jacket, I guess!

Oh, and by the way, I have the type 1 dial, and my warranty card/date of purchase was February 2019.

Last edited by atn_uk; 8 May 2020 at 01:59 AM.. Reason: to add last para.
atn_uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 01:58 AM   #42
ferrissteve11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,116
New SD43 has better lug proportions too, less 'square and blockish' looking.
ferrissteve11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:02 AM   #43
lcs77
"TRF" Member
 
lcs77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 513
Why you not looking for sd4k 116600? I think this one perfect for 1 watch collection.
__________________
116515LN - 116600 SD4K - 116710BLNR Batman - 116610LV Hulk - 16013 Datejust - 116500LN Black - 116500LN White - 126710BLRO Pepsi Jubilee - 126610LV - 126710BLRO Pepsi Oyster - Hublot Bigbang Unico - 226570 Polar
lcs77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:05 AM   #44
lcs77
"TRF" Member
 
lcs77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 513




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
116515LN - 116600 SD4K - 116710BLNR Batman - 116610LV Hulk - 16013 Datejust - 116500LN Black - 116500LN White - 126710BLRO Pepsi Jubilee - 126610LV - 126710BLRO Pepsi Oyster - Hublot Bigbang Unico - 226570 Polar
lcs77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:10 AM   #45
EconTigerOrange
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Carolinas
Watch: SD43 MKI
Posts: 150
I really don’t get the weight issue that some mention as I don’t even notice it at all. I guess it’s just different for each individual. I’m just a desk jockey, so maybe that’s why.
EconTigerOrange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:15 AM   #46
alphadweller
"TRF" Member
 
alphadweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 6,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcs77 View Post




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The 116600 is the true contender of the 126600. I still prefer the latter by a small margin. Had I not been able to score the SD43, I would have hunted the SD4K despite its little quirks.
alphadweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:21 AM   #47
franktehtank
"TRF" Member
 
franktehtank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
Quote:
Originally Posted by EconTigerOrange View Post
I really don’t get the weight issue that some mention as I don’t even notice it at all. I guess it’s just different for each individual. I’m just a desk jockey, so maybe that’s why.
It's really not that heavy. Just heavy compared to the submariner. I weighed mine at around 185 grams, without the divers extension and sized for my wrist. I think even the new Omega SM300m is around 180 grams give or take a link or two.

The SD43 really isn't a huge heavy watch by today's standards, especially considering the 4K ft dive rating.
franktehtank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:23 AM   #48
franktehtank
"TRF" Member
 
franktehtank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcs77 View Post




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a bit silly, but the end links on the SD4K would drive me crazy. They don't fit!

Other than that, fantastic watch IMO.
franktehtank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:55 AM   #49
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Sd43 or submariner date

Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverKast View Post
I have a 7.5" wrist as well and owned the SD43 and currently the 114060. I loved the look of the SD43 and found the size and fit wasn't an issue for me at all.

What I did dislike was the weight of the SD43. It was noticeable on my wrist to the point where it annoyed me. I prefer the weight of the 114060 as it isn't noticeable like the SD43 was.

Both are great watches, but for me the SD43 wasn't a good choice as my daily driver. Maybe as something to wear as a change up would work. Maybe I'll get another one and get back to you later lol.


I read if you remove the divers extension it makes the watch 180 grams. Also makes the watch for better. Did the height of it bother you at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:56 AM   #50
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by franktehtank View Post
So, uploading photos on this is kind of a pain. But here you go. Sorry for the low res but it wouldn't let me upload anything larger.


Thank you. Is the height noticeable? Could you wear under cuff if needed? I actually like the way the sub looks when dressed business casual.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 04:29 AM   #51
franktehtank
"TRF" Member
 
franktehtank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
Quote:
Originally Posted by teabags001 View Post
Thank you. Is the height noticeable? Could you wear under cuff if needed? I actually like the way the sub looks when dressed business casual.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you wear a tight modern shirt cuff, you might have issues fitting the SD43 but it's really not bad height wise. The case is designed so it melts into the wrist. Whereas a watch like the Pelagos, which is designed much blockier, wears thicker even though it's actually thinner dimensionally. The SD43 is definitely noticeably thicker than the submariner on the wrist.

The submariner IMO works better with dress shirts/business casual. It really is an incredibly versatile watch.

They're both so great, I have a hard time recommending one over the other, but for me and where I want my collection to go, the sub was the choice. If I had all the money in the world, I'd have them both, along with about 20 other watches
franktehtank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 04:33 AM   #52
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 699
The SD43, no contest for me.
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 04:44 AM   #53
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
For me the Sea Dweller doesn't make sense and the essence of the model ended up with the 116600, the last model with the classic SD design.

For daily use the Submariner is infinitely more comfortable and also a more logical purchase.
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 04:52 AM   #54
Roddypeepa
"TRF" Member
 
Roddypeepa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,683
Sd43 or submariner date

I think everyday bloke buys a sub as more wearable, cheaper, indistinguishable at glance to almost all, more comfortable. But enthusiast buys SD. if I was offered both black dial at retail I’d take SD. If hulk I’d take that for current resale value. On secondary market bluesy. But all great options.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roddypeepa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 04:56 AM   #55
Ec2016
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: DFW
Posts: 193
Even with big wrists, prefer the sub date. The SD43 wore much clunkier to me. The proportions felt a little off.

The sub date is much sleeker.
Ec2016 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 05:01 AM   #56
Rocco21
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Rob
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 126660,126600
Posts: 1,324
I just love the sea dweller so I’m posting again.Ive had around 25 subs and never was happy with any of them,once I got the sd43 I was finally happy.the size is amazing and it’s very symmetrical for its size.Wrist presence like no other except gold.The red lettering and minute markers on bezel and matte dial just do it for me.

Anyways subs are great but I’m going sea dweller for the win.
Rocco21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 05:06 AM   #57
kostal2093
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: ireland
Posts: 25
SD43 - no doubt whatsoever. After you wear one for a while, there is nothing to compare to it.
kostal2093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 06:19 AM   #58
jhd29
"TRF" Member
 
jhd29's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Joe
Location: Clinton, MA USA
Watch: 126600
Posts: 88
SD43 all day. It’s bigger all over. The older Sea-Dwellers were more thick compared to the perfect size of the newer 43mm. Just my 2 cents. (Plus, I opted for the SD43 and I have a 7.5-7.75 inch wrist)
__________________
____________________________________________
Rolex 126600 Sea-Dweller SD43
Panerai Luminor GMT PAM00088
G-Shock GW9400-1 Rangeman
Seiko SRP773 Turtle
jhd29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 06:33 AM   #59
teabags001
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
Thanks guys I’m really leaning towards the SD43. This is an older DJll I don’t wear at all that I will be using towards the transaction. It’s a true 41mm watch for reference. I don’t consider it thick but I know the SD43 is about 20 percent thicker. I have also asked to have the divers extension removed. Does having it removed make it wear better? I don’t want a top heavy watch that I will bump into everything.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
teabags001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 08:35 AM   #60
genkifd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Melbourne
Watch: SD43
Posts: 203
I have a SD43 on my 7" wrist if fits great. the weight thing actually is noticeable but i rather like the extra heft. when im wearing the SD43 i dont need to double check which watch is on my wrist.

ive attend a few formal events with my SD43 and fits under the cuff rather pleasantly.
__________________
SD43 MK1
Omega Dirty Dozen
Casio G Shock GMW-B5000D-1DR
SKX007 Japanese version
genkifd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.