Here are the new Tudor models...

[glamorama]

Good looking and practical GADA watch. Not getting the feeling I have to have it.

[fskywalker]

Originally Posted by planemad

39mm - far too small for me and most other men.

Not really, unless you have super large wrists!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Krash]

I find all this criticism ironic since I always thought Tudor watches were over rated on TRF. I never really liked them.

This is the first Tudor watch I like a lot. Love the blue color. I might get this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[garyk]

I think Tudor watches are great and getting better every year. So people here voice their dislike of the rivets. They are a design element and a very cool retro design. My guess, they will sell a bunch.

[fmc000]

The more I look at it the more I think that I would have preferred it gilt accents, maybe with creamy markers; they would have matched much better with the (fake) rivets IMHO.

[Etschell]

Originally Posted by garyk

I think Tudor watches are great and getting better every year. So people here voice their dislike of the rivets. They are a design element and a very cool retro design. My guess, they will sell a bunch.

people also used to hate PCLs. now you hear nothing when every new model has them. Where did all the haters go?

[alphadweller]

Despite the snowflake hand which I'm not a huge fan of, I'm strongly considerring this piece as my first Tudor. Looks cool.

[tanask211]

Some disliked the snow flakes hands, rivet bracelets, the hue, diameter too small.... There will never be a design that will be loved by everyone. IMHO, it retained the vintage design with more daring approach in terms of colour.

Sent from my SM-A910F using Tapatalk

[Thuilln]

Originally Posted by planemad

39mm - far too small for me and most other men.

#lol

[Etschell]

Originally Posted by Thuilln

#lol

essentially same lug to lug as the 16610, 16710 and 16520. but yes too small for most men

[wigdog63]

Originally Posted by Explorer2polar

Its a YES from me - as close as Rolex will allow Tudor to get to the original Submariner.

A steal at £2760 GBP

I agree-pretty hard to beat at that price point.

[garyk]

Originally Posted by etschell

essentially same lug to lug as the 16610, 16710 and 16520. But yes too small for most men

+1

[doramas]

Very beautiful

[214270Explorer]

In-house movement, an alternative color to "the ever-present everyday black watch", a decent price, and a popular 39mm size.

Nice!

[doogan]

Originally Posted by jjjones

Agreed. The fake rivets is the main thing putting me off getting one. That and maybe the crown sleeve. It sticks out too much, but I can live with that. The rivets though, I cant.

I honestly never notice the rivets when wearing my BB58.

The blue BB58 looks nice on a strap as well.

[Etschell]

Originally Posted by doogan

I honestly never notice the rivets when wearing my BB58.

The blue BB58 looks nice on a strap as well.

these comments are from people who have never owned a rivet style modern tudor. they claim it is terrible. they want a standard bracelet. i am glad tudor has a bit of distinction in their steel bracelets. not the standard. im good with rivet or no rivet.

tudor has the pelagos with a non rivet. but then the complaint is the watch is too light in weight.

there will always be a complaint which is just fine by me. everyone has an opinion and that is what makes us all different.

there are people who see tudor as junk. i mean we get a thread a week on a movement issue with the GMT but when the all mighty 3235 has issues people dont start abandoning their buying strategy on those models. i agree i would never want to buy a watch with a known movement issue but the standard is much different from many posters when it comes to tudor vs rolex. these posters dont value tudor as a brand. it is a shame but again we are all different. i see tudor as what rolex cannot be and perhaps that is why i appreciate them.

[Jster]

I agree with most of the negatives posted by others. I don’t like the snowflake hands, fake rivets, and not flush crown. It’s a handsome watch non the less. The size is fine.

[planemad]

Originally Posted by stmoore

“Far too small” at 39 - what a funny comment.

Stick with 44 and 48 mm Breitling and Panerai then?

You just have to look at why Rolex brought out the Datejust 41 as the market was dropping on smaller watches in the men’s range.
The same way omega increased the size of the current seamaster 300

I think it pretty poor from Tudor to make a 39mm (dive watch) - it’s just too small in my opinion and would be better at 42mm.

I love the colour mind you and if a bit bigger would acquire one.

[Chadridv]

Originally Posted by travisb

Nice but still prefer the black dial variant.

I agree!

That said, it looks like a really nice and fitting shade of blue.

[Etschell]

Originally Posted by planemad

You just have to look at why Rolex brought out the Datejust 41 as the market was dropping on smaller watches in the men’s range.
The same way omega increased the size of the current seamaster 300

I think it pretty poor from Tudor to make a 39mm (dive watch) - it’s just too small in my opinion and would be better at 42mm.

I love the colour mind you and if a bit bigger would acquire one.

pelagos blue.

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by Etschell

pelagos blue.

Snap!
dP

[RyanJ]

Originally Posted by planemad

You just have to look at why Rolex brought out the Datejust 41 as the market was dropping on smaller watches in the men’s range.
The same way omega increased the size of the current seamaster 300

I think it pretty poor from Tudor to make a 39mm (dive watch) - it’s just too small in my opinion and would be better at 42mm.

I love the colour mind you and if a bit bigger would acquire one.

I get your point completely.

However, the DJ41 is not 41mm. It is actually closer to 39mm. This was discussed on here quite a bit when it first came out. No idea why it is like this.

[Etschell]

Originally Posted by RyanJ

I get your point completely.

However, the DJ41 is not 41mm. It is actually closer to 39mm. This was discussed on here quite a bit when it first came out. No idea why it is like this.

39.96 mm.

[MYBROTHERSKEEPER]

Vids up on the tube https://youtu.be/kGZKoDnOH4Y

https://youtu.be/NQ89uUJFeTs

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

[chinaski]

I think the bracelet on my BB Steel is fantastic, and if I'm in the minority on that, I really don't care. It's well engineered, has ample adjustments, and is comfortable to wear. It's certainly beefier than the bracelet on my 14270 Explorer, but that's an Apples to Oranges comparison.

I really wish Tudor would make the Black Bay 41 with a White Dial. I'd be all over that like flies on poop!

[El-Duderino]

I like it. But I already have a BB58 and a BB Blue ETA. I’m guessing it will come down to trade in value on the ETA as to whether this new one joins the stable.

[dkast85]

i really like it but im just so reluctant to buy a tudor.

[collarcity]

Originally Posted by Hollie_Rollie

Rivets kill it for me. I don’t understand why they feel they are necessary? There’s no functional purpose to them

It's a style motif. Fake rivets are to bracelets what faux-tina is to dials.

I like the watch. Wish the gilt dial had carried over. The dimensions of the BB58 line are absolutely fantastic.

[DoctorA]

I will keep my blue bucherer and wait for the blue sub!! I can almost see it coming

[ILuvSubs]

I like that it doesn't have the gilt dial. I don't mind the rivet bracelet.

This will fly off the shelves!