The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Grand Seiko & Seiko Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 August 2020, 12:55 PM   #31
Dan GSR
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollieo View Post
Dig this watch so much. Been wanting a spring drive for the longest time but none of previous releases spoke to me enough, even the snowflake which I tried on. When I saw this release I decided to get it. Paid in full at my AD, waiting for delivery now. The two concerns I had before pulling the trigger was non rotating bezel (can’t easily get to a different time zone) since I work with people in different geographies on a daily basis, and the thickness.

But I saw one vid on Instagram and felt like the watch wears thin, so pulled the trigger with AD. There’s also two vids out on YouTube showing sbge255 and sbge257. Just search sbge257 (I cant post links yet...)

Released in Japan but not in the US yet from what I understand. My AD said I’m getting the first sbge257 delivery.

Btw was deciding between the green and blue dial, but I have a Batman and also a seiko blue alpinist. Plus the green was a bit more subtle, whereas the blue dial was a bit too screaming to me. Can’t wait to get my watch

great choice. I tried on the green , absolute stunner
and it DOES wear thinner than the numbers suggest
great buy
Dan GSR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2020, 01:39 PM   #32
RyanJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 1,448
I wish these were Titanium. Those measurements in titanium would be my perfect watch. I would buy all three.
RyanJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2020, 03:47 PM   #33
Rollieo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,186
Got the call from my AD, will be posting pics when i get it in!

I’m even thinking about doing a review on YouTube. Never done it before, but stoked about getting this one that I might do it. Haha
Rollieo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2020, 09:44 PM   #34
gnuyork
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,353
14.7mm thick??
gnuyork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2020, 12:50 PM   #35
Rollieo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnuyork View Post
14.7mm thick??
Check out my post here. It’s crazy

https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...8&postcount=26
Rollieo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2020, 09:12 PM   #36
accountank2000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: London
Watch: 116519LN, 79220R
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollieo View Post
Check out my post here. It’s crazy

https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...8&postcount=26
That doesn't look too bad at all. Having had a Seadweller 16600 for a few years and wearing a GO pano as a dress watch, I'm OK with something that's relatively thick for its dial size. The spring drive GMT isn't a super-compact movement.

I really liked the SBGE245 a while ago, the limited or special edition spring dial GMT with red / burgundy dial, but at 44mm I couldn't convince myself (even though lug to lug it wasn't as big as the 44mm might imply). If they are going to make a habit of making more compact sporty GMTs, I'm all ears, especially if an interesting dial comes along.

Looking at the Monochrome hands-on link above though, I kind of agree with one of the comments on that site:

"what is the point of a fixed, non movable bezel in a gmt watch? there are already gmt hour markings inside the dial, so the function is kind of redundant." This is true - if I'm getting a numbered bezel I would like to be able to move it - either as an extra time zone, or as simple timing function pretending it's a dive watch. You can do that with the 44mm watch I mentioned above, but not it seems with these new ones. So if I can't move the bezel I would be tempted to say just use the space to give me a bigger or clearer dial.

Anyway, nice review and thanks for the link to your other thread - I'm sure it's a nice piece!
accountank2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2020, 03:44 AM   #37
Vegas863
"TRF" Member
 
Vegas863's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Tim
Location: Florida
Watch: Hamilton X-Wind
Posts: 13
The GS GMT models have really caught my attention, particularly the SBGE253 and the older SBGE201.

While doing some research into the GMT models I came across a reviewer on YT that mentioned the hour hands on the SBGE201 do not align in the dead center on the hour marker when the minute hand reaches the top of the hour. Instead the hour hand is at the center of the marker closer to four or five minutes from the top of the hour (at the 55 or 56 minute mark).

As I understand it, the new GMT models use the same 9R66 Spring Drive movement, so I'm curious if this off-centered hour hand issue is present on these models as well? Or perhaps the review simply got a hold of a defective review model, although I believe in the review he mentioned it was evident across a number of the watches?

Not sure if posting the video is appropriate in the event this really is a non-issue, but wanted to get some feedback from anyone who ones any of the GS GMT Spring Drive models.
Vegas863 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.